期刊文献+

基于灰色关联分析的复杂网络节点重要性综合评价方法 被引量:26

Synthesis Evaluation Method for Node Importance in Complex Networks Based on Grey Relational Analysis
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 针对现有复杂网络节点重要性评价存在的问题:(1)单一指标评价的片面性;(2)多指标评价时各指标选取的主观性;(3)往往忽视指标间的关联信息,该文提出一种基于灰色关联分析的综合评价方法。在对多类常用评价指标的特性分析的基础上,采用极大不相关法实现指标筛选,利用改进熵权法确定各指标的权重,最终以灰色关联分析方法确定各节点的重要性。采用美国航空网数据集进行的实验结果表明,该方法具有较好的节点重要性区分能力,这项工作对于进一步完善节点重要性评价理论框架具有启发意义和实用价值。 To avoid the inadequacy of node importance evaluation in complex networks, such as ( 1 ) the unilateralism of single index ; (2) the subjectivity during index selection of multi-index evaluation (3) the neglect of the correlation analysis on evaluating indexes, this paper proposes a synthesis evaluation approach using the grey relational analysis mechanism. Based on analyzing and comparing the features of several characteristic indexes, infinite irrelevance is introduced to screen indexes. An improved entropy weight calculating method is used to confirm the weight for evaluating indexes and the grey relational analysis is applied to calculate the importance of nodes. A detailed case study on the US air transportation network is given. The experimental result shows that the proposed approach performs better on discrimination and precision. The approach helps to perfect the evaluation of node importance in complex networks.
出处 《南京理工大学学报》 EI CAS CSCD 北大核心 2012年第4期579-586,共8页 Journal of Nanjing University of Science and Technology
基金 国家自然科学基金(61003210) 江苏省自然科学基金(BK2010491) 江苏省'六大人才高峰'项目(11-C-028)
关键词 复杂网络 节点重要性 极大不相关 熵权 灰色关联分析 complex networks node importance infinite irrelevance weighted entropy greyrelational analysis
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1Vespignani A. Complex networks : The fragility of inter- dependency[ J]. Nature,2010,464:984-985.
  • 2王林,戴冠中.复杂网络的Scale.free性、Scale-free现象及其控制[M].北京:科学出版社,2009.
  • 3Lai Y C, Motter A E, Nishikawa T. Attacks and cascades in complex networks [ J ]. Lecture Notes in Physics, 2004,650 : 299- 310.
  • 4Landherr A, Friedl B, Heidemann J. A critical review of centrality measures in social networks [ J ]. Business & Information Systems Engineering ,2010,2 ( 6 ) :371-385.
  • 5Kermarrec A, Merrer E L, Sericola B, et al. Second order centrality: distributed assessment of nodes criticity in complex networks [ J ]. Computer Communications,2011, 34(5) :619-628.
  • 6Hu J, Wang B, Lee D Y. Evaluating node importance with multi-criteria [ A ]. IEEE/ACM International Conferences on Cyber, Physical and Social Computing [ C ]. Hangzhou, China :IEEE,2010:792-797.
  • 7Holme P, Kim B J, Chang N Y, et al. Attack vulnerability of complex networks [ J ]. Physical Review E,2002,65 (5) : e056109.
  • 8张尧庭,方开泰.多元统计分析引论[M].北京:科学出版社,1999.
  • 9何贵青,陈世浩,田沄,郝重阳.多传感器图像融合效果综合评价研究[J].计算机学报,2008,31(3):486-492. 被引量:17
  • 10王润孝,张近乐.熵权分析法在大学出版社经营风险评估中的应用[J].兰州大学学报(社会科学版),2010,38(1):20-24. 被引量:6

二级参考文献15

  • 1马苗,郝重阳,韩培友,樊养余,黎新伍.基于灰色关联分析的图像保真度准则[J].计算机辅助设计与图形学学报,2004,16(7):978-983. 被引量:22
  • 2徐宝昌,陈哲.基于模糊Choquet积分的图像融合效果评价[J].光电工程,2004,31(11):42-46. 被引量:13
  • 3张越,靳天佑.枪械设计专家系统原型的研究[J].华北工学院学报,1996,17(4):328-334. 被引量:2
  • 4教育部社会科学司.2008年度(图书)出版单位情况调查表[R].2009.
  • 5朱杰人.大学出版:风云变幻三十年[N].出版商务周报,2009-08-23(20).
  • 6Anoop A,Christopher A,Messac A.Pitfalls of thetypical construction of design matrices for concept se-lection. AIAA 2003-466 .
  • 7Messac A.Physical programming: effective optimization for computational design. AIAA Journal . 1996
  • 8Osman Kulak,Cengiz Karhaman.Fuzzy multi-attribute selection among transportation companies using axiomatic design analytic hierarchy process. Journal of Information Science . 2005
  • 9Kahraman C,Cebeci U,Ruan D.Multi-attribute Comparison of Catering Service Companies Using Fuzzy AHP:the Case of Turkey. International Journal of Production Economics . 2004
  • 10张志强,徐斌,何勇灵,刘丽芳,王刚.基于AHP评价方法的发动机性能评价[J].兵工学报,2008,29(5):625-628. 被引量:28

共引文献67

同被引文献217

引证文献26

二级引证文献143

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部