期刊文献+

胃大部切除术后3年胃癌患者生活质量的EORTC QLQ-C30与QLQ-STO22联合评价 被引量:32

Combined use of EORTC QLQ-C30 and QLQ-STO22 for assessment of quality of life in patients with gastric cancer after surgery for 3 years
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:采用欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织(EORTC)生活质量核心30问卷调查(QLQ-C30)和QLQ-STO22评价胃癌术后3年患者的生活质量(QOL).方法:对96名胃大部切除术后3年的胃癌患者和90名年龄和性别相匹配的门诊体检健康者进行研究.胃癌患者和健康者平均年龄分别为53.2岁±8.1岁和54.8岁±7.9岁.88.5%患者为I期胃癌术后.患者自行完成QLQ-C30量表和QLQ-STO22量表,对各评分进行统计分析.结果:胃癌患者和健康者EORTC QLQ-C30整体健康状况和QOL评分无显著差异.胃癌患者的认知功能、情绪功能和疲劳要优于对照健康者.但胃癌患者恶心和呕吐评分、经济困难、反流、进食受限和体型评分较健康者差.其他评分未见显著差异.结论:胃癌术后3年,患者的QOL整体评分基本恢复至正常水平,但在某些方面,特别是与上消化道相关的症状(如恶心呕吐、反流、进食受限等)与健康者存在差距.有必要基于这些差异采取针对性的措施进行治疗和护理. AIM: To evaluate the quality of life (QOL) in pa- tients with gastric cancer (GC) after surgery for 3 years with EORTC QLQ-C30 and QLQ-STO22. METHODS: Ninety-six GC patients who under- went gastrectomy 3 years ago and 90 healthy subjects were recruited into the present study. The mean age was 53.2 ± 8.1 years for GC pa- tients and 54.8 ± 7.9 years for healthy subjects, and 88.5% of patients were diagnosed with stage I GC. There were no differences in age and gender between the two groups. QLQ-C30 and QLQ-STO22 were employed to evaluate the QOL in these subjects.RESULTS: The QLQ-C30 global QOL was comparable between GC patients and healthy subjects (60.1 ± 18.5 vs 58.3 ± 17.2, P 〉 0.05). The QOL with regard to cognitive functioning (71.0 ± 11.4 vs 63.6 ± 12.8), emotional functioning (79.4 ± 13.7 vs 71.2 ± 12.6) and fatigue (33.9 ± 10.6 vs 40.9 ± 11.3) of GC patients was superior to that of healthy subiects (all P 〈 0.05). However, the QOL with regard to nausea and vomiting (17.6 ± 10.4 vs 10.2 ± 8.7), financial difficulties (32.8 ± 14.3 vs 10.1 ± 8.6), reflux (19.4±14.3 vs 11.1± 14.7), eating restrictions (15.9 ± 14.6 vs 10.2 ± 7.8) and body image (30.8 ± 16.5 vs 15.7 ± 10.2) was inferior to those of healthy subjects. No marked differences were observed in the scores of other domains/items between the two groups. CONCLUSION: The QOL of GC patients nearly returns to normal level 3 years after surgery. The QOL related to upper gastrointestinal symptoms is significantly impaired in GC patients com- pared to healthy subjects.
出处 《世界华人消化杂志》 CAS 北大核心 2012年第19期1782-1786,共5页 World Chinese Journal of Digestology
关键词 胃癌 生活质量 EORTC QLQ-C30 QLQ-STO22 Gastric cancer Quality of life European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life C30 EORTC QLQ-STO22 stomach module
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献91

  • 1王海军,徐克静.问卷调查中的信度和效度问题[J].中国健康教育,1994,10(11):21-23. 被引量:27
  • 2Dongsheng Li Huimian Xu.The Quality of Life of Gastric Cancer Patients with and without Duodenal Passage Reconstructions after Total Gastrectomy[J].Chinese Journal of Clinical Oncology,2005,2(5):810-814. 被引量:4
  • 3梁寒,郝希山.胃癌术式对患者术后营养的影响[J].中国肿瘤临床,2007,34(12):716-720. 被引量:19
  • 4Cull A, Sprangers M, Bjordal K, et al. EORTC Quality of Life Group translation procedure, on behalf of the EORTC Quality of Life Group. 2nd Ed. Brussels. 2002.
  • 5Booth ML, Owen N Bauman AE, et al. Retest Reliability of Recall Measures of Leisure-time Physical Activity in Australian Adults. In J Epidemiol, 1996, 25(1): 153-159.
  • 6Garratt A, Schmidt L, Mackintosh A, et al. Quality of Life measurement: bibliographic study of patient assessed health outcome measures. BMJ,2002, 324(7351): 1417-1419.
  • 7Vickery CW, Blazeby JM, Conroy T, et al. Development of an EORTC disease-specific quality of life module for use in patients with gastric cancer. Eur J Cancer,001, 37(8): 996-971.
  • 8Blazeby JM, Nicklin J, Brookes ST, et al. Feasibility of quality of life assessment in patients with upper gastrointestinal tract cancer. Br J Cancer,2003 89(3): 497- 501.
  • 9Rehse B, Pukrop R. Effects of psychosocial interventions on quality of life in adult cancer patients: meta analysis of 37 published controlled outcome studies. Patient Educ Couns 2003;50:179-186.
  • 10Arraras JI, Wright S, Greimel E, Holzner B, Kuljanic-Vlasic K, Velikova G, Eisemann M, Visser A. Development of a questionnaire to evaluate the information needs of cancer patients: the EORTC questionnaire. Patient Educ Couns 2004;54:235-241.

共引文献484

同被引文献326

引证文献32

二级引证文献338

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部