期刊文献+

吡柔比星与羟喜树碱预防浅表性膀胱癌术后复发的疗效比较 被引量:10

Comparison of curative effect between pirarubicin and hydroxycamptothecine on prevention of postoperative recurrence about superficial bladder cancer
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的比较膀胱灌注吡柔比星与羟喜树碱预防浅表性膀胱癌术后复发的疗效。方法 50例浅表性膀胱癌术后患者,分为吡柔比星组及羟喜树碱组。羟喜树碱组:膀胱灌注采用羟喜树碱;吡柔比星组:膀胱灌注采用吡柔比星。结果治疗后,两组的淋巴细胞转化率均显著提高(P<0.01)。吡柔比星组与羟喜树碱组的复发率、首次复发时间及淋巴细胞转化率,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。两组患者副作用发生率,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。羟喜树碱组治疗费用显著低于吡柔比星组。结论吡柔比星与羟喜树碱预防浅表性膀胱癌术后复发的疗效均可靠、副作用小,但是羟喜树碱可明显节省费用,防止患者因经济承受力不足而中断治疗。 Objective To comparison of curative effect between pirarubicin and hydroxycamptothecine irrigation of bladder prevention of postoperative recurrence about superficial bladder cancer. Methods Fifty cases of superficial bladder cancer divided into THP group and HCPT group. HCPT group: hydroxycamptothecin; THP group: pirarubicin. Results After treatment, the rate of lymphocyte transformation of the two group were significantly increased (P 〈0. 01 ). The recurrence rate,time and lymphocyte transformation rate to first recurrence of THP group with HCPT group, the difference was not sta- tistically significant (P 〉 0.05). The incidence of side effects between two groups of patients, the differences were not sta- tistically significant (P 〉 0.05) The cost of treatment of HCPT group was lower than that of THP group. Conclusion Pi- rarubicin and hydroxycamptothecine prevention of superficial bladder cancer recurrence after curative effect, little side ef- fect. However, hydroxy camptothecin, can significantly save costs, prevent patients because of economic affordability and interruption of treatment.
出处 《中国现代医生》 2012年第14期146-147,150,共3页 China Modern Doctor
基金 浙江省医药卫生科学研究基金项目计划(2006B124)
关键词 吡柔比星 羟喜树碱 浅表性膀胱癌 术后复发 淋巴细胞转化率 Pirarubicin Hydroxycamptothecin Superficial bladder cancer Postoperative recurrence Lymphocyte transfor- mation rate
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

二级参考文献74

共引文献58

同被引文献83

  • 1安瑞,赵玉宝,高平.经尿道膀胱肿瘤电切术后膀胱灌注吡柔比星治疗浅表性肿瘤的疗效观察[J].中国药物与临床,2012,12(S1):38-40. 被引量:17
  • 2张会清,王光辉.吡柔比星膀胱灌注预防浅表膀胱肿瘤复发的临床研究[J].中国医师杂志,2006,8(12):1718-1719. 被引量:3
  • 3吴阶平.泌尿外科学[M].济南:山东科学技术出版社,2003,4..
  • 4张天泽.手术后辅助化疗.见:韩锐,主编.肿瘤化疗预防及药物治疗[M].北京医科大学,中国协和医科大学联合出版社.1994:771-779
  • 5Lamm DL.Prophylaxis for recurrent transitional cell carcinoma[J].Urology,1991,37(5 Suppl):21-23.
  • 6Mochizuki Y, Matsushima E, Omura K. Perioperative assessment of psychological state and quality of life of head and neck cancer patients undergoing surgery. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2009,38 (2) :151-159.
  • 7Babjuk M, Oosterlinck W, Sylvester R, et at. EAU guidelines on non-muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma of the bladder, the 2011 update[J]. Eur Urol, 2011,59(6) :997-1008.
  • 8Malmst~m PU, Sylvester R J, Crawford DE, et al. An individual patient data meta-analysis of the long-term outcome of randomised studies comparing intravesical mitomycin C versus bacillus Calmette-Gu6rin for non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer [ J ]. Eur Urol, 2009,56(2) :247-256.
  • 9Shelley MD, Jones G, Cleves A, et al. Intravesical gemcitabine therapy for non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) : a sys- tematic review[J]. BJU Int, 2012,109(4) :496-505.
  • 10Oddens JR, van der Meijden AP, Sylvester R. One immediate postoperative instillation of chemotherapy in low risk Ta, T1 bladder cancer patients. Is it always safe? [ J ]. Eur Urol, 2004,46 ( 3 ) :336-338.

引证文献10

二级引证文献66

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部