期刊文献+

改良土无侧限抗压强度试件的制作方法对比 被引量:1

The preparation method contrast of improved soil unconfined compressive strength test pieces
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 对改良土无侧限抗压强度试验的过程进行了介绍,着重对比了采用静压法、锤击法制件的无侧限抗压强度,不同尺寸试件的无侧限抗压强度。结果表明:采用锤击法制件得到的无侧限抗压强度平均值、偏差系数均大于采用静压法制件得到的无侧限抗压强度平均值、偏差系数。对于同一种土样,长柱试件无侧限抗压强度值与短柱无侧限抗压强度值有很好的线性相关性。 This paper introduced the test process of improved soil unconfined compressive strength,emphatically contrasted the unconfined compressive strength using static pressure method,hammering method finished piece,unconfined compressive strength of different size test pieces.The results showed that: the unconfined compressive strength average value obtained by hammering method finished piece,the deviation coefficient was greater than the unconfined compressive strength average value obtained by the static pressure method.For the same soil sample,long column test pieces unconfined compressive strength value had good linear relationship to short column unconfined compressive strength value.
作者 钱忻
出处 《山西建筑》 2012年第11期86-88,共3页 Shanxi Architecture
关键词 改良土 无侧限抗压强度 试验方法 尺寸 对比 improved soil unconfined compressive strength test method size contrast
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献5

共引文献39

同被引文献1

  • 1冶金工业部建筑研究总院.建筑地基处理规范(JGJ79-2002)[S].北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2002.

引证文献1

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部