期刊文献+

Assessment of Two Turbulence Models and Some Compressibility Corrections for Hypersonic Compression Corners by High-order Difference Schemes 被引量:14

Assessment of Two Turbulence Models and Some Compressibility Corrections for Hypersonic Compression Corners by High-order Difference Schemes
原文传递
导出
摘要 The Spalart-Allmaras (S-A) turbulence model, the shear-stress transport (SST) turbulence model and their compressibility corrections are revaluated for hypersonic compression comer flows by using high-order difference schemes. The compressibility effect of density gradient, pressure dilatation and turbulent Mach number is accounted. In order to reduce confusions between model uncertainties and discretization errors, the formally fifth-order explicit weighted compact nonlinear scheme (WCNS-E-5) is adopted for convection terms, and a fourth-order staggered central difference scheme is applied for viscous terms. The 15° and 34° compression comers at Mach number 9.22 are investigated. Numerical results show that the original SST model is superior to the original S-A model in the resolution of separated regions and predictions of wall pressures and wall heat-flux rates. The capability of the S-A model can be largely improved by blending Catris' and Shur's compressibility corrections. Among the three corrections of the SST model listed in the present paper, Catris' modification brings the best results. However, the dissipation and pressure dilatation corrections result in much larger separated regions than that of the experiment, and are much worse than the original SST model as well as the other two corrections. The correction of turbulent Mach number makes the separated region slightly smaller than that of the original SST model. Some results of low-order schemes are also presented. When compared to the results of the high-order schemes, the separated regions are smaller, and the peak wall pressures and peak heat-flux rates are lower in the region of the reattachment points. The Spalart-Allmaras (S-A) turbulence model, the shear-stress transport (SST) turbulence model and their compressibility corrections are revaluated for hypersonic compression comer flows by using high-order difference schemes. The compressibility effect of density gradient, pressure dilatation and turbulent Mach number is accounted. In order to reduce confusions between model uncertainties and discretization errors, the formally fifth-order explicit weighted compact nonlinear scheme (WCNS-E-5) is adopted for convection terms, and a fourth-order staggered central difference scheme is applied for viscous terms. The 15° and 34° compression comers at Mach number 9.22 are investigated. Numerical results show that the original SST model is superior to the original S-A model in the resolution of separated regions and predictions of wall pressures and wall heat-flux rates. The capability of the S-A model can be largely improved by blending Catris' and Shur's compressibility corrections. Among the three corrections of the SST model listed in the present paper, Catris' modification brings the best results. However, the dissipation and pressure dilatation corrections result in much larger separated regions than that of the experiment, and are much worse than the original SST model as well as the other two corrections. The correction of turbulent Mach number makes the separated region slightly smaller than that of the original SST model. Some results of low-order schemes are also presented. When compared to the results of the high-order schemes, the separated regions are smaller, and the peak wall pressures and peak heat-flux rates are lower in the region of the reattachment points.
出处 《Chinese Journal of Aeronautics》 SCIE EI CSCD 2012年第1期25-32,共8页 中国航空学报(英文版)
基金 Foundation items: National Basic Research Program of China (2009CB723801) National Natural Science Foundation of China (11072259)
关键词 AERODYNAMICS high-order weighted compact nonlinear scheme hypersonic compression comers turbulence models compressibility corrections shock/boundary layer interactions shock waves aerodynamics high-order weighted compact nonlinear scheme hypersonic compression comers turbulence models compressibility corrections shock/boundary layer interactions shock waves
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献27

  • 1蔡力,封建湖,谢文贤,王振海.求解粘性Hamilton-Jacobi方程的高阶方法[J].计算物理,2005,22(2):123-129. 被引量:2
  • 2涂国华,袁湘江,夏治强,呼振.A CLASS OF COMPACT UPWIND TVD DIFFERENCE SCHEMES[J].Applied Mathematics and Mechanics(English Edition),2006,27(6):765-772. 被引量:1
  • 3张涵信.无波动、无自由参数的耗散差分格式[J].空气动力学学报,1988,7(2):1431-165.
  • 4[1]Barakos G,Drikakis D.Assessment of Various Low-Reynolds Number Turbulence Models in Shock-Boundary Layer Interaction[J].Comput.Methods Appl.Mech.Engrg,1998,160:155-174.
  • 5[2]Liou W W,Huang G,Shih T H.Turbulence Model Assessment of Shock Wave/Turbulent Boundary-Layer Interaction in Transonic and Supersonic Flows[J].Computers and Fluids,2000,29:275-299.
  • 6[3]Johnson D A,Horstman C C,Bachalo W D.Comparison Between Experiment and Prediction for a Transonic Turbulent Separated Flow[J].AIAA J.,1982,20(6):737-744.
  • 7[4]Delery J.Experimental Investigation of Turbulence Properties in Transonic Shock-Boundary-Layer Interactions[J].AIAA J.1983,21:180-185.
  • 8[5]Jones W P,Launder B E.The Prediction of Laminarization with a two Equation Model of Turbulence[J].Int.J.of Heat and Mass Transfer,1972,15:301-304.
  • 9[6]Wilcox D C,Traci R M.A Complete Model of Turbulence[R].AIAA Paper 76-351,1976.
  • 10[7]Menter F R.Two Equation Eddy Viscosity Turbulence Models for Engineering Applications[J].AIAA J.,1994,32:1598-1605.

共引文献30

同被引文献76

引证文献14

二级引证文献80

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部