期刊文献+

胸、腹腔镜联合食管癌手术消化道不同重建径路术后疗效的比较 被引量:10

Comparison between the Efficacy of Different Approaches for Gastric Tube Reconstruction after Esophagectomy Combined with Thoracoscopy and Laparoscopy for Esophageal Carcinoma
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨胸、腹腔镜联合食管癌手术消化道不同重建径路术后的疗效。方法回顾性分析2007年12月~2010年12月我院125例胸、腹腔镜联合食管癌手术的临床资料,其中94例经食管床径路(食管床组)、31例经胸骨后径路(胸骨后组)重建消化道,比较2组术中、术后情况。结果 2组手术时间、淋巴结清扫数量、术中出血量、术后住院时间无明显差别(P>0.05)。2组围术期无死亡病例。食管床组术后吻合口漏发生率低于胸骨后组,但无统计学差异(4.3%vs.16.1%,χ2=3.302,P=0.069),术后第1天胃肠减压液量明显多于胸骨后组[(306.0±151.7)ml vs.(118.6±76.9)ml,t=6.591,P=0.000],术后第1天胸引流液量明显少于胸骨后组[(306.4±195.7)ml vs.(419.0±257.6)ml,t=-2.559,P=0.012]。2组术后肺部感染、心房纤颤、胸腔积液等并发症发生率无统计学差异(P>0.05)。结论胸、腹腔镜联合食管癌手术消化道不同重建径路术后疗效差异不大,应综合病人个体化选择消化道重建径路。 Objective To evaluate the postoperative outcome of the patients undergone gastric tube reconstruction via different routes after esophagectomy combined with thoracoscopy and laparoscopy for esophageal carcinoma. Methods A total of 125 patients who underwent esophagectomy with thoracoscopy and laparoseopy from December 2007 to December 2010 were analyzed retrospectively. There were 94 patients in prevertebral group and 31 in retrosternal group. Evaluation indicators included the outcome of the operation and perioperative complications. Results No significant differences was found between the two groups in operation time, number of the lymph nodes removed, intraoperative blood loss, and hospital stay (P 〉 0.05 ). No death occurred in both the groups. Anastomotie leakage occurred more frequently in retrosternal group than that in prevertebral group, but there was no significantly different between the two groups ( 16.1% vs. 4.3% , X2 = 3. 302, P = 0. 069). On the first day after the surgery, the amount of gastric juice of the prevertebral group was more than that in the retrosternal group [ (306.0 ± 151.7) ml vs. ( 118.6 ml ± 76.9) ml, t = 6. 591, P = 0. 000] , but the amount of pleural fluid drainage of the prevertebral group was less than that in the retrosternal group [ (306.4± 195.7) ml vs. (419.0 ± 257.6) ml, t = - 2. 559, P = 0. 012]. Perioperative complications were not significantly different between the two groups ( P 〉 0.05). Conclusion In the esophagectomy combined with thoraeoscopy and laparoscopy for esophageal carcinoma, gastric tube reconstruction via the prevertebral and the retrosterual approaches have similar outcomes, individualized gastric tube reconstruction should be considered.
出处 《中国微创外科杂志》 CSCD 2011年第12期1082-1085,共4页 Chinese Journal of Minimally Invasive Surgery
关键词 胸腔镜 腹腔镜 胸胃重建 Thoracoscopy Laparoscopy Gastric Tube Reconstruction
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

  • 1Japanese Society For Esophageal Diseases. Guideline for Clinical and Pathologic Studies on Carcinoma of the Esophogus ( ninth edition). Esophagus ,2004,1:61 - 88.
  • 2朱成楚,陈仕林,叶敏华.电视胸腔镜下行食管癌手术胸部淋巴结清扫[J].中华外科杂志,2005,43(10):628-630. 被引量:73
  • 3陈保富,朱成楚,马德华,叶加洪,王春国,吴春雷,林江,叶中瑞.胸、腹腔镜联合手术治疗食管癌[J].中国微创外科杂志,2009,9(8):707-708. 被引量:58
  • 4Levy RM, Wizorek J, Shende M, et al. Laparoscopic and thoraeoscopic esophagectomy. Adv Surg,2010,44 : 101 - 116.
  • 5Verhage RJ, Hazebroek E J, Boone J, et al. Minimally invasive surgery compared to open procedures in esophagectomy for cancer: a systematic review of the lite:ature. Minerva Chir,2009,64(2 ) : 135 - 146.
  • 6陈建华,卫功铨,邵令方,高宗人,许金良,陈明耀.食管癌颈部、胸内吻合术疗效对比观察及生活质量评价[J].中华肿瘤杂志,1996,18(2):131-133. 被引量:60
  • 7方文涛,陈文虎,范利民,曹克俭,陈勇,蒋勇.食管癌切除术后不同重建途径吻合口瘘的原因及预防[J].中华胃肠外科杂志,2005,8(3):217-219. 被引量:56
  • 8Katsoulis IE, Robotis I, Kouraklis G, et al. Duodenogastric reflux after esophagectomy and gastric pull-up: the effect of the route of reconstruction. World J Stag, 2005,29 ( 2 ) : 174 - 181.
  • 9Wang H, Feng M, Tan L, et al. Comparison of the short-term quality of life in patients with esophageal cancer after subtotal esophagectomy via video-asslsted thoracoscopic or open surgery. Dis Esophagus, 2010,23 (5) :408 - 414.

二级参考文献26

  • 1朱成楚,陈仕林,叶敏华.电视胸腔镜下行食管癌手术胸部淋巴结清扫[J].中华外科杂志,2005,43(10):628-630. 被引量:73
  • 2陈建华,卫功铨,邵令方,高宗人,许金良,陈明耀.食管癌颈部、胸内吻合术疗效对比观察及生活质量评价[J].中华肿瘤杂志,1996,18(2):131-133. 被引量:60
  • 3朱成楚,陈仕林,叶中瑞,郭剑波,叶敏华,马德华,叶加洪.电视胸腔镜下食管癌切除及疗效分析(附120例报道)[J].中华胸心血管外科杂志,2006,22(6):364-365. 被引量:37
  • 4Smithers BM, Gotley DC, Martin I,et al. Comparison of the outcomes between open and minimally invasive esophagectomy. Ann Surg, 2007,245 : 232 - 240.
  • 5Bottger T, Terzic A, Muller M, et al. Minimally invasive transhiatal and transthoracic esophagectomy. Surg Endosc, 2007,21 : 1695 - 1700.
  • 6Nguyen NT, Roberts P, Follette DM, et al. Thoracoscopic and laparoscopic esophagectomy for benign and malignant disease: lessons learned from 46 consecutive procedures. J Am Coll Surg,2003,197 (6) :902 -913.
  • 7Lelbman S, Smithers BM, Gotley DC, et al. Minimally invasive esophagectomy: short- and long-term outcomes. Surg Endosc,2006, 20(3) :428 -433.
  • 8Luketich JD, Alvelo-Rivera M, Buenaventura PO, et al. Minimally invasive esophagectomy: outcomes in 222 patients. Ann Surg,2003,238(4) :486 - 495.
  • 9邵令方,中华胸心血管外科杂志,1994年,10卷,41页
  • 10陈建华,中华肿瘤杂志,1994年,16卷,441页

共引文献232

同被引文献97

引证文献10

二级引证文献96

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部