期刊文献+

多中心临床观察雷贝拉唑联合多潘立酮治疗胃食管反流病的症状缓解情况 被引量:7

Rabeprazole combined with domperidone treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease: a multi-center clinical observation
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的观察雷贝拉唑联合多潘立酮治疗胃食管反流病(GERD)的临床疗效。方法采用多中心、随机、开放、观察性研究方法,将收集的130例GERD门诊患者随机分为观察组(雷贝拉唑联合多潘立酮)64例和对照组(单用雷贝拉唑)66例,以胃食管反流病诊断问卷(GERDQ量表)和一般资料调查方式进行症状评分,症状评分根据烧心、反流、上腹痛等发生的频率和程度。随访4周,比较治疗后2周末和4周末两组患者症状的改善情况。结果治疗前观察组和对照组GERDQ评分值基线一致,治疗2周末,两组GERD症状GERDQ评分值均有明显下降,分别为8.45±2.53和9.17±2.42;治疗4周末疗效更明显,分别为6.03±1.54和6.70±1.78;治疗前后差异有统计学意义(t=16.113,t=14.149;P值均〈O.01)。观察组在治疗2周和4周末GERDQ分值较对照组下降更快,差异有统计学意义(t=-1.658,P=0.050;t=-2.292,P=0.012)。一观察组和对照组治疗2周后GERD症状分值均明显下降(t=2.006,P=0.047),4周后反流症状分值有明显下降,差异有统计学意义(t-2.287,P=0.022)。治疗2周末观察组烧心和反流症状总有效率为79.0%和73.0%,对照组为67.7%和69.7%,观察组优于对照组;但治疗4周末观察组和对照组总有效率相似。结论雷贝拉唑联合多潘立酮能更快缓解GERD烧心和反流症状。 Objective To observe the clinical effect of rabeprazole combined with domperidone in the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Methods A randomized and open study in a multi-center was adopted. Clinical observation GERD Q questionnaire survey was performed on 130 patients to investigate relevant symptoms of gastroesopbageal reflux disease. They were divided randomly into observed group (domperidone and rabeprazole)and control group (rabeprazole). the scores of GERD Q and symptoms were carried out according to the occurrence frequency and degrees of heartburn,gastroesophageal reflux, nausea and epigastric pain, etc. In a follow-up of 4 weeks, scores were compared between the two groups after the treatment of 2 weeks and 4 weeks. Results Compared with the baseline, the GERD Q scores of both two groups had declined after 2 weeks and remarkably declined after 4 weeks with a significant difference (t = 16. 113, t = 14. 149;P〈 0. 001). And the observed group decreased more than the control group without significant difference (t = -1. 658, P=0. 050;t=-2. 292,P=0. 012). The observed group showed remarkably improvent of heartburn after 2 weeks and regurgitation after 4 weeks with a significant difference(t= 2. 287, P= 0. 022). The observed group showed a higter effective rate on the symptoms of heartburn and regurgitation than the control group after 2 Weeks. Whereas two groups had the same effect after 4 weeks. Conci^ion Rabeprazole combined with domperidone can rapidly relieve the symptoms of GERD.
出处 《中华消化杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2011年第11期761-765,共5页 Chinese Journal of Digestion
关键词 胃食管反流 苯咪唑类 多潘立酮 药物疗法 联合 多中心研究 Gastroesophageal reflux Benzimidazoles Domperidone Drug therapy,combination Multicenter study
  • 相关文献

参考文献16

  • 1中国胃食管反流病共识意见专家组.中国胃食管反流病共识意见(2006·10三亚)[J].中华内科杂志,2007,:170-173.
  • 2Jones R, Junghard O, Dent J, et al. Development of the GerdQ, a tool for the diagnosis and management of gastro- oesophageal reflux disease in primary care. Aliment Pharmacol Ther, 2009, 30 : 1030-1038.
  • 3吴小平,凌奇荷.胃酸抑制与反流性食管炎的愈合[J].中华消化杂志,2003,23(3):178-179. 被引量:66
  • 4Fock KM, Talley NJ, Fass R, et al. Asia-Pacific consensus on the management of gastroesophageal reflux disease: update. J Gastroenterol Hepatol, 2008,23: 8-22.
  • 5吴巧艳,周旭春,彭小华,潘慧.雷贝拉唑对非糜烂性反流病症状和心理的影响[J].中国药房,2010,21(28):2666-2668. 被引量:2
  • 6Fujimoto K, Hongo M, Maintenance Study Group. Safety and efficacy of long-term maintenance therapy with oral dose of raheprazole 10 mg once daily in Japanese patients with reflux esophagitis. Intern Med, 2011,50: 179-188.
  • 7Vigneri S, Termini R, Leandro G, et al. A comparison of five maintenance therapies for reflux esophagitis. N Engl J Med, 1995,333:1106-1110.
  • 8Ruth M, Finizia C, Cange L,et al. The effect of mosapride on oesophageal motor function and acid reflux in patients with gastro-oesophageal reflux disease. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol, 2003,15 : 1115-1121.
  • 9Ruth M, Hamelin B, Rohss K, et al. The effect of mosapride, a novel prokinetie, on acid reflux variables in patients with gastro-oesophageal reflux disease. Aliment Pharmaeol Ther, 1998,12:35-40.
  • 10Madan K, Ahuja V, Kashyap PC, et al. Comparison of efficacy of pantoprazole alone versus pantoprazole plus mosapride in therapy of gastroesophageal reflux disease: a randomized trial. Dis Esophagus, 2004,17 : 274-278.

二级参考文献13

共引文献79

同被引文献67

引证文献7

二级引证文献45

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部