期刊文献+

飞机整机级系统安全性评估方法探讨 被引量:13

Study on Aircraft System Safety Assessment Method in Aircraft Level
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 为提高飞机整机级系统安全性评估效果,在明确整机级系统安全性评估思想的情况下,详细描述了整机级系统安全性分析和整机级系统安全性验证的流程;运用故障树分析法和故障模式与影响分析法研究了能够满足整机级系统安全性要求的评估方法和关键技术。实例表明:整机级严酷等级评估方法能够定性地防止颠覆性的逻辑错误;功能故障树可以对安全性指标进行精确的分配和计算;结合故障树和故障模式与影响分析法而形成的两阶段指标分配法提高了个别安全性指标数值,但仍符合安全性要求。 For the purpose of promoting the effect of System Safety Assessment in Aircraft Level, the process of System Safety Analysis and System Safety Validation in Aircraft Level is put forward on the premise of making clear the idea of System Safety Assessment in Aircraft Level. Fault Tree Analysis (FTA) and Failure Mode and Effect Analysis (FMEA) are utilized to study the assessment methods and key technologies that meet the requirements of System Safety Assessment in Aircraft Level. An example proves that Critical Severity Assessment Method in Aircraft Level can prevent subversive logical mistakes qualitatively, FTA can precisely allocate and calculate safety indexes, and the two-phase index allocation method combined FTA with FMEA increases the value of some safety indexes, but still satisfies safety demands.
出处 《中国安全科学学报》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2011年第10期125-130,共6页 China Safety Science Journal
关键词 系统安全性评估 整机级 两阶段指标分配法 系统安全性分析 系统安全性验证 system safety assessment aircraft level two-phrase index allocation method system safety analysis system safety validation
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1杨祯梅,孙安宏.对民用飞机整机级安全性评估依据和方法的探讨[A].第二届中国航空维修工程学术研讨会论文集[C],2005:72-76.
  • 2韩小琦.航空发动机控制系统安全性评估研究[D].天津:中国民航大学,2008.
  • 3MIL-STD-882E, Draft Standard Practice for System Safety[S]. 2005.
  • 4李建军.发射装置可靠性指标分配方法研究及其应用[J].舰船科学技术,2009,31(5):102-104. 被引量:14
  • 5Rudolph Frederick Stapelberg. Handbook of Reliability, Availability, Maintainability and Safety in Engineering Design[M]. London: Springer,2009:89 - 114.
  • 6Acar, Erdem. Aircraft Structural Safety: Effects of Explicit and Implicit Safety Measures and Uncertainty Reduction Mechanisms[D]. Florida: University of Florida, 2006.
  • 7Sloan, John C. Finite Safety Models for High-assurance Systems[ D]. Florida: Atlantic University, 2010.
  • 8Krishna B. Misra. Handbook of Performability Engineering[M]. London: British Library, 2008:56 -63.
  • 9梁晓锋,易宏,张裕芳,冯正平.Numerical Simulation to Reliability Analysis of Fault-Tolerant Repairable System[J].Journal of Shanghai Jiaotong university(Science),2010,15(5):526-534. 被引量:3
  • 10XU Ling-ling, CHUN Xiao, DU Hui-bin. Building fire protection system reliability analysis based on GO method[A]. 2010 IEEE the 17th International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management [C], 2010 : 1 019 - 1 022.

二级参考文献29

  • 1徐奕航,金钊,张有志,张云.编队舰空导弹武器系统战斗使用可靠性分析[J].战术导弹技术,2008(3):1-5. 被引量:1
  • 2SINGH H, VAITHILINGAM S, ANNE R K, et al. Terminal reliability using binary decision diagrams [J]. Microelectronics and Reliability, 1996, 36(3): 363-365.
  • 3RAUZY A, DUTUIT Y. Exact and truncated computations of prime implicants of coherent and non-coherent fault trees within Aralia [J]. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 1997, 58(2): 127-144.
  • 4ROCCO C M, MORENO J A. Fast Monte Carlo reliability evaluation using support vector machine [J]. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 2002, 76(3): 237-243.
  • 5DUGAN J B, BAVUSO S J, BOYD M A. Dynamic fault- tree models for fault-tolerant computer systems [J]. IEEE Transactions on Reliability, 1992, 41(3): 363- 377.
  • 6DUGAN J B, BAVUSO S J, BOYD M A. Fault trees and Markov models for reliability analysis of fault-tolerant digital systems [J]. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 1993, 39(3): 291-307.
  • 7BALAKRISHNAN M, TRIVEDI K S. Stochastic Petri nets for the reliability analysis of communication network applications with alternate-routing [J]. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 1996, 52(3): 243-259.
  • 8MURA I, BONDAVALLI A. Markov regenerative stochastic Petri nets to model and evaluate phased mission systems dependability [J]. IEEE Transactions on Computers, 2001, 50(12): 1337-1351.
  • 9VOLOVOI V. Modeling of system reliability Petri nets with aging tokens [J]. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 2004, 84(2): 149-161.
  • 10Yu D C, NGUYEN T C, HADDAWY P. Bayesian network model for reliability assessment of power systems [J]. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 1999,14(2): 426-432.

共引文献17

同被引文献89

引证文献13

二级引证文献33

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部