期刊文献+

基于累积前景理论的随机用户均衡交通分配模型 被引量:18

Stochastic User Equilibrium Model Based on Cumulative Prospect Theory
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 为了使交通分配更符合出行者的实际行为特征,基于累积前景理论,给出了交通流连续分布状态下路径前景的连续函数表达式,建立了随机用户均衡模型,并给出了等价的变分不等式.该模型同时考虑了交通系统的不确定性、出行者的感知误差以及建模者的观测误差.讨论了模型解的性质,设计了求解算法,并通过算例进行了验证.结果表明:在(0,1)区间内,当出行可靠性参数或风险态度参数值越大时,出行者对于风险的感知越敏感,越倾向于选择行程时间波动较小的路径;当感知误差较小或路网不确定性程度较大时,出行者的路径选择行为均逐渐趋于稳定.研究还表明,出行者的损失规避程度对网络均衡态的影响不明显. In order to make traffic assignment he in more accordance with travelers' actual behavior, a continuous function for path prospect was presented based on the cumulative prospect theory. A stochastic user equilibrium model and its equivalent variational inequality were formulated. This model can captures three kinds of uncertainty simultaneously, namely traffic system's uncertainty and errors in travelers' perceptions and modeler's observation. Some properties of the proposed model were discussed, and a corresponding algorithm and numerical example were presented. The research result indicates that with the increasing of travel reliability parameter or risk attitude parameter between interval 0 and 1, travelers will be more sensitive to risk and inclined to choose routes with less travel time variability, while travelers' choices will be stabilized in the event of small perception errors or a high degree of uncertainty. Furthermore, the loss aversion coefficient has a little influence on equilibrium traffic flow.
出处 《西南交通大学学报》 EI CSCD 北大核心 2011年第5期868-874,共7页 Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目(50978163)
关键词 累积前景理论 随机用户均衡 变分不等式 交通分配 cumulative prospect theory stochastic user equilibrium variational inequality traffic assignment
  • 相关文献

参考文献25

  • 1WARDROP J G. Some theoretical aspects of road traffic research[J]. Proceedings of the Institute of Civil Engineers, 1952, 1(2):325-378.
  • 2DAGANZO C F, SHEFFI Y. On stochastic models of traffic assignment [ J ]. Transportation Science, 1977( 11 ) : 253-274.
  • 3NAGURNEY A. A multiclass, multicriteria traffic network equilibrium model[ J ]. Mathematical and Computer Modeling, 2000, 32(3): 393-411.
  • 4van LINT J W C, van ZUYLEN H J, TU H. Travel time unreliability on freeways: why measures based on variance tell only half the story[J]. Transport Research : Part A, 2008, 42 ( 1 ) : 258-277.
  • 5ANTHONY C, ZHOU Z. The a-reliable mean-excess traffic: equilibrium model with stochastic travel times[J]. Transport Research: Part B, 2010, 44(4) : 493-513.
  • 6SIMON H A. Behavioral model of rational choice[J]. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1955, 69( 1 ) : 99-118.
  • 7KAHNEMAN D, TVERSKY A. Prospect theory: an analysis of decision under risk[J]. Econometrica, 1979, 47(2) : 263-291.
  • 8TVERSKY A, KAHNEMAN D. Advances in prospect theory : cumulative representation of uncertainty [ J ]. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 1992, 5 (4) : 297- 323.
  • 9FUJII S, KITAMURA R. Drivers' mental representation of travel time and departure time choice in uncertain traffic network conditions[J]. Networks and Spatial Economics, 2004, 4 (3) : 243-256.
  • 10JOU R C, KITAMURA R, WENG M C, et al. Dynamic commuter departure time choice under uncertainty[ J ]. Transportation Research : Part A, 2008, 42 (5) : 774-783.

二级参考文献44

共引文献47

同被引文献245

引证文献18

二级引证文献84

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部