摘要
目的：观察经桡动脉或经股动脉采血气标本在新生儿临床应用中的效果，优化新生儿临床穿刺率。方法：将405例需动脉采血气标本的患儿按随机原则分为经桡动脉采血组（203例）和经股动脉组（202例），比较两组采血方式的一次性穿刺成功率，操作所需时间和安全陛。结果：经桡动脉组一针穿刺成功率明显高于股动脉组，操作时间、局部青紫淤斑、采血后按压时间和采血过程中疼痛程度明显低于股动脉组，P〈0．05，差异有统计学意义。结论：经桡动脉采血气标本更快速，安全，方便。可作为新生儿动脉采血气标本的首选方法。
Objective： To observe the radial artery or femoral artery blood gas specimens in the neonatal effects of clinical application, optimal clinical puncture rate of neonatal. Methods： 405 children were divided randomly into via radial artery collection blood group（203 cases） and via femoral artery collection blood group（202 cases）. To compare the one-time success rate, operating time and security of the two blood collection methods. Results： A needle through radial artery group was significantly higher than the success rate of the femoral artery group, operating time, local bruising ecchymosis, blood collection and blood collection after the press time, the process of pain was significantly lower than the femoral artery group. The difference was statistically significant （P〈 0.05）. Conclusions： The radial artery blood gas samples is more rapid, safe and convenient. Neonatal arterial blood gas as the preferred method of specimen.
关键词
动脉采血气标本
新生儿
arterial blood gas samples
newborns
