期刊文献+

经Airtraq喉镜使用钢丝加强型导管和普通气管导管的比较 被引量:14

Comparison of intubation with steel-reinforced trachea tube and normal trachea tube via Airtraq laryngoscopy
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的观察Airtraq喉镜使用钢丝加强型导管和普通气管导管进行气管插管的临床效果。方法 90例行择期整形外科手术的需气管插管的全麻患者,随机分为钢丝加强型导管组(A组)和普通导管组(B组),每组45例。常规静脉快速诱导后,用Airtraq喉镜分别携带钢丝加强型导管或普通气管导管行气管插管。观察两组患者的插管时间、插管成功率、插管期间的血流动力学变化以及术后并发症的发生情况。结果所有患者全部用Airtraq喉镜完成气管插管,B组一次插管成功率(91.1%)低于A组(95.6%)(P<0.05);B组插管时间[(35.4±16.6)s]显著长于A组[(26.8±9.0)s](P<0.05),两组血流动力学变化及术后并发症的发生情况差异无统计学意义。结论 Airtraq喉镜能够安全有效地应用于全麻患者的气管插管,使用钢丝加强型导管可以进一步提高插管成功率,缩短插管时间。 Objective To observe the intubation effects on steel-reinforced trachea tube and normal trachea tube with Airtraq laryngoscopy. Methods Ninety ASA Ⅰ or Ⅱ general anesthesia patients scheduled for selective plastic surgery were randomized into 2 groups (n=45 for each): the steel-reinforced trachea tube group (group A) and normal trachea tube group (group B). After rapid intravenous induction, the patients in each group were orally intubated with Airtraq laryngoscope. Intubation time, success rate at the first intubation, hemodynamics during intubation and postoperative complications were recorded. Results All patients were intubated successfully. The success rate at the first intubation in group B (91.1%)was lower than group A(95. 6%)(P〈0. 05). The intubation time in group B[(35. 4±16. 6)s] was significantly longer than group A[(26.8±9.0) s] (P〈0. 05). No significant difference was found with respect to hemodynamics and postoperative complication. Conclusion Airtraq laryngoscopy can be safely used in tracheal intubation under general anesthesia. Airtraq laryngoscopy via sted-reinforced trachea tube can increase intubetion success rate and shorten intubation time.
出处 《临床麻醉学杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2011年第6期544-546,共3页 Journal of Clinical Anesthesiology
关键词 AIRTRAQ喉镜 气管插管 成功率 Airtraq laryngoscopy Tracheal intubation Success rate
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

  • 1Maharaj CH, Costello JF, Harte BH, et al. Evalution of the Airtraq and Macintosh laryngoscope in patients at increased risk for difficult tracheal intubatioru Anaesthesia, 2008, 63: 182-188.
  • 2Takahashi S, Mizutani T, Miyabe M, et al. Hemodynamie responses to tracheal intubation with laryngoscope versus light- wand intubating device (Trachlight) in adults with normal airway. Anesth Analg,2002,95:480-484.

同被引文献88

  • 1陈秀琪.充分吸氧去氮后呼吸停止安全时限的观察[J].职业与健康,2004,20(9):135-136. 被引量:2
  • 2王冬青.临床应用GlideScope视频喉镜行气管插管132例体会[J].南京医科大学学报(自然科学版),2007,27(8):886-887. 被引量:18
  • 3Aoi Y, Inagawa G, Nakamura K, et al. Airway scope versus macintosh laryngoscope in patients with simulated limitation of neck movements. J Trauma, 2010,69 (4) : 838-842.
  • 4Sun DA, Warriner CB, Parsons DG, et al. The GlideScope Video Laryngoscope: randomized clinical trial in 200 patients. Br J Anaesth,2005,94 (3) :381-384.
  • 5Hsian WT, Lin YH,Wu HS, et al. Does a new videolaryngo-scope provide better glottic exposure? Acta Anaesthesiol Tai- wan,2005,43(3) :147-151.
  • 6Takachashi S, Mizutani T, Miyabe M, et al. Hemodynamic responses to tracheal intubation with laryngoscope versus lightwand intubating device (Trachlight) in adults with normal airway. Anesth Analg, 2002,95 (2) : 480-484.
  • 7Ndoko SK, Amathieu R, Tual L. Trachealintubation of mor- bidly obese patients: a randomized trial comparing performance of Macintosh and Airtraq laryngoscopes. Br J Anaesth, 2008, 100(2):263-268.
  • 8Dhonneur G, Ndoko S, Amathieu R. Tracheal Intubation u sing the Airtraq in morbid obese patients undergoing emergen cy cesarean delivery. Anesthesiology, 2007,106(3) : 629-630.
  • 9Maharaj CH, Higgins BD, Harte BH, et al. Evaluation of in tubation using the Airtraq or Macintosh laryngoscope by an aesthetists in easy and simulated difficult laryngoscopy-a mani kin study. Anaesthesia, 2006,61(5) : 469-477.
  • 10Dhonneur G, Abdi W, Amathieu R, et al. Optimising tracheal intubation success rate using the Airtraq laryngoscope. Anaes thesia, 2009, 64(3):315-319.

引证文献14

二级引证文献55

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部