期刊文献+

Comparison between Empirical Estimation by JRC-JCS Model and Direct Shear Test for Joint Shear Strength 被引量:10

Comparison between Empirical Estimation by JRC-JCS Model and Direct Shear Test for Joint Shear Strength
原文传递
导出
摘要 In order to study the reliability of the empirical estimation of joint shear strength by the JRC(joint roughness coefficient)-JCS(joint compressive strength) model,natural rock joints of dif-ferent lithologic characteristics and different sizes were selected as samples,and their shear strengths under dry and saturated conditions were measured by direct shear test and compared to those esti-mated by the JRC-JCS model.Comparison results show that for natural rock joints with joint surfaces closely matched,the average relative error of joint shear strength between empirical estimation and direct shear test is 9.9%;the reliability of the empirical estimation of joint shear strength by the JRC-JCS model is good under both dry and saturated conditions if the JRC is determined accounting for directional statistical measurements,scale effect and surface smoothing during shearing.However,for natural rock joints with joint surfaces mismatched,the average relative error of joint shear strength between empirical estimation and direct shear test is 39.9%;the reliability of empirical estimation of joint shear strength by the JRC-JCS model is questionable under both dry and saturated conditions. In order to study the reliability of the empirical estimation of joint shear strength by the JRC(joint roughness coefficient)-JCS(joint compressive strength) model,natural rock joints of dif-ferent lithologic characteristics and different sizes were selected as samples,and their shear strengths under dry and saturated conditions were measured by direct shear test and compared to those esti-mated by the JRC-JCS model.Comparison results show that for natural rock joints with joint surfaces closely matched,the average relative error of joint shear strength between empirical estimation and direct shear test is 9.9%;the reliability of the empirical estimation of joint shear strength by the JRC-JCS model is good under both dry and saturated conditions if the JRC is determined accounting for directional statistical measurements,scale effect and surface smoothing during shearing.However,for natural rock joints with joint surfaces mismatched,the average relative error of joint shear strength between empirical estimation and direct shear test is 39.9%;the reliability of empirical estimation of joint shear strength by the JRC-JCS model is questionable under both dry and saturated conditions.
出处 《Journal of Earth Science》 SCIE CAS CSCD 2011年第3期411-420,共10页 地球科学学刊(英文版)
基金 supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 40672186, 50809059) the Natural Science Foundation of Zhejiang Province (No. Y505008), China
关键词 joint shear strength direct shear test empirical estimation JRC JRC-JCS model. joint shear strength direct shear test empirical estimation JRC JRC-JCS model.
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献2

共引文献18

同被引文献139

引证文献10

二级引证文献146

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部