期刊文献+

个人特征因素与企业社会责任取向关系研究——基于国企员工和大学本科生样本分析 被引量:3

The Relationship between Personal Characteristics and CST Orientation——An empirical analysis based on the samples of state-owned enterprise employees and undergraduates
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 依据Carroll(2000)观点,企业管理者的社会责任取向,可以被视为企业社会绩效的指示器。人们的价值观念会影响他们对社会责任的看法与取向,同时又受到个人特征因素的影响。在国内较少关于企业社会责任取向(CSRO)实证研究的背景下,基于313份国有企业员工和大学本科生样本数据,实证分析了个人特征中性别和道德水平二个因素对企业社会责任取向的影响,结果发现:男性与女性在社会责任取向上并不存在显著差异,女性相比男性略微看重慈善责任;道德水平差异的影响较显著,道德水平较高者更加看重法律责任,而更不看重慈善责任。从文化教育、个人背景等方面对结论进行合理解释。 According to Carroll (2000), CSR (corporate social responsibility) can be viewed as an indicator of the corporate social performance, for it is aff orientation of managers eeted by their values and personal characters. Given that there are few empirical researches on CSR orientation in China, the paper empirieally analyzes the effect of such personal eharacteristies as the gender and the moral standard on CST orientation with 313 samples involving state-owned enterprise employees and under- graduates. It has been found out that there is no the exception that the female shows pretty more significant gender difference in CSR orientation with concerns to the philanthropic responsibility than the male. However more significance is revealed in the effect of individual moral standard. Those with higher moral standard prefer to attach importance on the legal responsibility rather than the philanthropic responsibility. The paper gives a reasonable explanation about the findings from the perspectives of culture , education and personal background.
作者 陈汉辉
机构地区 苏州大学
出处 《西安建筑科技大学学报(社会科学版)》 2011年第2期23-28,共6页 Journal of Xi'an University of Architecture & Technology(Social Science Edition)
基金 江苏省2009年度普通高校研究生科研创新计划课题(CX09B_049R)
关键词 企业社会责任取向 性别 道德水平 corporate social responsibility orientation gender moral standard
  • 相关文献

参考文献23

  • 1CARROLL, A B. A Commentary and An Overview of Key Questions on Corporate Social Performance Measurement [J]. Business and Society, 2000,39 (4) : 466-478.
  • 2ANGELIDIS J, IBRAHIM N. An Exploratory Study of the Impact of Degree of Religiousness Upon an Individual's Corporate Social Responsiveness Orientation[J]. Journal of Business Ethics, 2004,51(2):119-128.
  • 3COFFEY, R E, COOK C W, HUNSAKER P L. Management and Organizational Behavior[M]. Burr Ridge, Irwin IL, 1994:87.
  • 4MEGLINO B M, RAVLIN E C. Individual Values in Organizations: Concepts, Controversies, and Research[J]. Journal of Management, 1998,24 (3) : 351-389.
  • 5CARROLL A B. A three-dimensional conceptual model of corporate social performance[J]. Academy of Management Review, 1979(4):497-506.
  • 6AUPPERLE K, CARROLL A B, HATFIELD J. An empirical examination of the relationship between corporate so- cial responsibility and profitability[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 1985,28(2):446-463.
  • 7PINKSTON, TAMMIE S, ARCHIE B. CARROLL. A Retrospective Examination of CSR Orientations. Have they changed? [J]. Journal of Business Ethics, 1996,15(2): 199-206.
  • 8ANGELIDIS, BRENDA L. MASSETTI & Pauline Magee-Egan Does Corporate Social Responsibility Orientation Vary by Position in the Organizational Hierarchy? [J]. Review of Business, 2008, spring:23-32.
  • 9NABIL A, IBRAHIM, DONALD P, etal. The Relationship between Religiousness and Corporate Social Responsibil- ity Orientation: Are there Differences Between Business Managers and Students?[J]. Journal of Business Ethics, 2008(78):165-174.
  • 10晁罡 袁品 段文.高校生企业社会责任取向之实证研究.应用伦理研究通讯,2007,(44):22-35.

二级参考文献52

共引文献57

同被引文献42

  • 1中国企业家调查系统.企业家对CSR的认识与评价.管理世界,2007,(6):76-85.
  • 2晁罡 袁品 段文.高校生企业社会责任取向之实证研究.应用伦理研究通讯,2007,(44):22-35.
  • 3詹姆斯·E·波斯特,安妮·T·劳伦斯,詹姆斯·韦伯.企业与社会:公司战略公共政策与伦理(第10版)[M].张志强,译.北京:中国人民大学出版社,2005:19-20.
  • 4Burr N, Brian K. , W Harvey Hegarty. Some Determinants of Student Corporate Social Responsibility Orientation[J]. Business and Society, 1999,38 (2) : 188 - 206.
  • 5Aupperle K, Carroll A B, Hatfield J. An Empirical Examination of the Relationship Between Corporate Social Responsibility and Profitability [ J ]. Academy of Management Journal, 1985,28 (2) :446 - 463.
  • 6Ford, R. C. , W. D. Richardson. Ethical Decision Making:A Review of the Empirical Literature [ J ]. Journal of Business Ethics, 1994,13 (3) :205 - 221.
  • 7Ibmhim, N. A. , J. P. Angelidis. Effect of Board Members' Gender on Corporate Social Responsiveness Orientation [J]. Journal of Applied Business Research, 1994,10 ( 1 ) : 35 - 40.
  • 8Kraft, K. L., A. Singhapakdi. The Relative Importance of Social Responsibility in Determining Organizatiottal Effectiveness :Student Responses II [ J ]. Journal of Business Ethics, 1995,14(4) :315 - 326.
  • 9McCuddy, M. K. , B. L. Perry. Selected Individual Differences and Collegians' Ethical Beliefs [ J ]. Journal of Business Ethics, 1996,15 ( 3 ) :261 - 272.
  • 10Brain K. , Burton, Jiing-LinFarh, Harvey W. H. Across- Cultural Comparison of Corporate Social Resonsibility Orientation: Hong Kong VS. United States Students [ J ]. Teaching Business Ethies,2000, (4) :151 -167.

引证文献3

二级引证文献7

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部