期刊文献+

胸段食管鳞癌转移性淋巴结体积对预后影响的研究 被引量:6

Influence of volume of lymph node metastases on survival in thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的:通过分析非手术胸段食管鳞癌患者转移淋巴结体积(VLN)与生存的关系,探讨其对非手术食管癌患者预后的影响。方法:回顾性分析接受根治性放化疗的70例有淋巴结转移的胸段食管癌患者的临床及随访资料。按淋巴结体积分为A组25例、B组23例和C组22例,比较3组患者生存率的差异,分析转移淋巴结体积对非手术胸段食管鳞癌患者预后的影响。结果:中位随访26个月,70例患者1、2和3年总生存率分别为60.5%、44.3%和13.0%。A、B和C组的中位生存时间分别为(31±2.566)(、21±2.057)和(10±0.739)个月,组间比较差异均有统计学意义,P均<0.05;A、B和C组的1、2和3年生存率差异均具有统计学意义,P值均<0.05;Cox回归显示,转移淋巴结体积及T分期是影响非手术胸段食管鳞癌患者生存的独立因素。结论:转移淋巴结体积是影响非手术胸段食管癌患者预后的一个重要因素,对淋巴结体积与非手术食管癌预后关系的深入研究可能有助于指导非手术食管癌的分层治疗。 OBJECTIVE:To investigate the effect of metastatic lymph node volume(VLN) on the prognosis of patients with thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma(TESCC) by analyzing the relationship between VLN and survival data of TESCC.METHODS:The data from 70 cases of TESCC with lymph node metastases treated was divided into A(n=25),B(n=23) and C(n=22) groups,and analyzed by radiochemotherapy.The survival difference and the impact of various VLN groups on survival were compared.RESULTS:With a median follow-up of 26 months,the overall survival rates at 1,2 and 3 years were 60.5%,44.3% and 13.0%,respectively.The values of median survival time of the three VLN groups were(31±2.566),(21±2.057) and(10±0.739)months(P0.05),The 1-,2-,3-year survival rates of the three VLN groups were significantly from each other(P0.05).The VLN and T staging were the most important prognostic factors.CONCLUSIONS:The metastatic LN volume is an important prognostic factor in non-operable TESCC.The further exploration is warranted so as to direct the stratified-treatment of TESCC.
出处 《中华肿瘤防治杂志》 CAS 2010年第22期1845-1848,共4页 Chinese Journal of Cancer Prevention and Treatment
关键词 食管肿瘤 淋巴结体积 生存分析 预后 esophageal neoplasms volume of lymph node survival analysis prognosis
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

  • 1戎铁华,张兰军.食管癌和贲门癌[M]//.万德森.临床肿瘤学.2版.北京:科学出版社.2005:289-300.
  • 2陈龙奇.制订2009第7版食管癌TNM分期标准[J].中国胸心血管外科临床杂志,2008,15(1):52-55. 被引量:121
  • 3施学辉.现代放射肿瘤学[M].上海:复旦大学出版社,2001:347~369.
  • 4Takashima S, Takenchi N, Shiozak H, et al. Carcinoma of the esophagus: Computed tomography vs MR imaging in determiningresectability[J]. AJR, 1991, 156(2): 297-302.
  • 5张惠茅,杨海山.螺旋CT在食管癌检查中的临床应用[J].临床放射学杂志,2001,20(6):433-435. 被引量:11
  • 6Casson A C, Ruseh V W, Ginsberg R J, et al. Lymph node mapping of esophageal eancer[J]. Ann Thorac Surg, 1994, 58(5) : 1560-1570.
  • 7Jemal A, Siegel R, Ward E, et al. Cancer slatistics, 2008[J]. CA Caneer J Clin, 2008,58(2) :71-96.
  • 8张合林,平育敏,杜喜群,白世祥,何清波.应用Cox模型分析影响食管癌切除术后的预后因素[J].中华肿瘤杂志,1999,21(1):32-34. 被引量:39
  • 9Fujita H, Sueyoshi S, Tanaka T, et al. Three-field dissection for squamous cell carcinoma in the thoracic esophagus[J]. Ann Thorae Carciovasc Surg, 2002, 8(6):328-335.
  • 10Sharma O P, Chandermohan, Mashankar A S, et al. Role of computed tomography in preoperative evaluation of esophageal carcinorna[J]. India J Cancer, 1994, 31(1): 12-18.

二级参考文献19

  • 1金丕焕,医用统计方法(第2版),1993年,387页
  • 2黄国俊,食管癌和贲门癌,1990年,138页
  • 3全国肿瘤防治办公室,中国常见恶性肿瘤诊治规范.1,1990年,6页
  • 4全国肿瘤防治办公室,中国常见恶性肿瘤诊治规范.9,1990年,16页
  • 5邵令方,食管外科学,1987年,452页
  • 6李子平,中华放射学杂志,1998年,32卷,104页
  • 7Parkin DM, Bray F, Ferlay J, et al. Global cancer statistics 2002. CA Cancer J Clin, 2005, 55 : 74-108.
  • 8Tachibana M, Kinugasa S, Dhar DK, et al. Prognostic factors after extended esophagectomy for squamous cell carcinoma of the thoracic esophagus. J Surg Oncol, 1999, 72: 88-93.
  • 9Rice TW, Blackstone EH, Rybicki LA, et al. Refining esophageal cancer staging. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 2003, 125: 1103-1113.
  • 10Takemura M, Osugi H, Takada N, et al. Prognostic factors in patients with squamous oesophageal cancer associated with solitary lymph node metastasis after oesophagectomy and extended lymphadenectomy. Oncol Rep, 2003, 10: 75-80.

共引文献195

同被引文献61

引证文献6

二级引证文献44

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部