期刊文献+

多西他赛联合塞替派与多西他赛联合卡培他滨治疗转移性乳腺癌的随机、对照临床研究 被引量:21

Randomized clinical case-control trial for the comparison of docetaxel plus thiotepa versus docetaxel plus capecitabine in patients with metastatic breast cancer
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:比较多西他赛联合塞替派方案和多西他赛联合卡培他滨方案治疗转移性乳腺癌的临床疗效及其安全性。方法:选择北京大学临床肿瘤学院乳腺肿瘤内科2006年8月至2008年9月收治的女性乳腺癌患者共46例,采用多西他赛联合塞替派(A组)或卡培他滨(B组)方案进行随机、对照临床治疗试验,A组第1、8天多西他赛35 mg/m2静脉滴注,第1天塞替派60-65 mg/m2静脉滴注,B组第1、8天多西他赛35 mg/m2静脉滴注,第1-14天卡培他滨1 000 mg/m2,口服,每日2次。21 d为1个周期,至少应用2个周期。结果:多西他赛联合塞替派组22例,多西他赛联合卡培他滨组24例,两组患者基线情况一致。可评价疗效多西他赛联合塞替派组21例,多西他赛联合卡培他滨组22例。两组疗效分别为部分缓解9.52%vs.27.27%(2/21例,6/22例),稳定52.38%vs.31.82%(11/21例,7/22例),进展38.10%vs.40.91%(8/21例,9/22例),疾病控制率分别为61.90%vs.59.09%(13/21例,13/22例),中位无进展生存期分别为7.9个月(95%CI0.77-15.03)vs.8.3个月(95%CI4.01-12.59),1年生存率分别为88.2%vs.81%,P值均〉0.05,每两组间差异无统计学意义。无化疗相关死亡病例。多西他赛联合塞替派组和多西他赛联合卡培他滨组最常见的不良反应为骨髓抑制,主要不良反应Ⅲ-Ⅳ度发生率分别为白细胞减少45.45%vs.26.09%,中性粒细胞减少45.45%vs.21.74%,血小板减少9.09%vs.0%,手足综合征0%vs.13.04%,P值均〉0.05,每两组间差异无统计学意义。结论:多西他赛联合塞替派方案治疗转移性乳腺癌有一定近期疗效,不良反应可耐受,可以作为经济、有效的解救方案。 Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of docetaxel plus thiotepa(TXT/TSPA) and docetaxel plus capecitabine(TXT/CAPE) in patients with metastatic breast cancer.Methods: The patients were randomized to give intravenous TXT 35 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8 plus intravenous TSPA 60-65 mg/m2 on day 1 every 3 weeks,or intravenous TXT 35 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8 plus oral CAPE 1 000 mg/m2 twice daily on days 1 to 14 every 3 weeks,at least 2 cycles applied.Results: TXT/TSPA group(22 patients) and TXT/CAPE group(24 patients) had consistent baseline.Docetaxel thiotepa group(21 cases) and docetaxel combined with capecitabine group(22 cases) were evaluated for their clinical responses,which showed that 2 of the 21(9.52%) from TXT/TSPA group and 6 of the 22(27.27%) from TXT/CAPE group had achieved partial remission;11 of the 21(52.38%) from TXT/TSPA group versus 7 of the 22(31.82%) from TXT/CAPE group for stable diseases;8 of the 21(38.10%) from TXT/TSPA group versus and 9 of the 22(40.91%) from TXT/CAPE group for progressive diseases,respectively.The disease control rate was 61.90%(13/21) and 59.09%(13/22) for TXT/TSPA and TXT/CAPE groups,the median progression-free survival(PFS) was 7.9 months [95% confidence interval(CI) 0.77 to 15.03] from TXT/TSPA group versus 8.3 months(95% CI 4.01 to 11.79) from TXT/CAPE group.One year survival rate was 88.20% for TXT/TSPA versus 81.00% for TXT/CAPE group,respectively.P values all exceeded 0.05,and the two groups showed no difference.No chemotherapy-related deaths occurred.Myelosuppression was the major side effect.The adverse events of grades 3 to 4 respectively occurred in TXT/TSPA and TXT/CAPE groups:leucocytopenia was 45.45% vs.26.09%;neutropenia 45.45% vs.21.74%;thrombocytopenia 9.09% vs.0%;hand-foot syndrome 0% vs.13.04%.P values all exceeded 0.05,and the two groups showed no difference.Conclusion: Combination of docetaxel and thiotepa in the treatment of metastatic breast cancer has some curative effect and adverse reactions can be tolerated.It can be used as an economical and effective rescue plan.
出处 《北京大学学报(医学版)》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2011年第1期151-156,共6页 Journal of Peking University:Health Sciences
关键词 乳腺肿瘤 多西他赛 塞替派 卡培他滨 Breast neoplasms Docetaxel Thiotepa Capecitabine
  • 相关文献

参考文献19

  • 1Fumoleau P,largillier R,Clippe C,et al.Multicentre,phase II study evaluating capecitabine monotherapy in patients with anthracycline-and taxane-pretreated metastatic breast cancer[J].Eur J Cancer,2004,40 (4):536-542.
  • 2Silvestris N,D' Aprile M,Andreola G,et al.Rationale for the use of gemcitabine in breast cancer(Review)[J].Int J Oncol,2004,24(2):389-398.
  • 3Toussaint IZZO,Spielmann M.Phase I-II trail of continuous infusion vinorelbine for advanced breast cancer[J].J Clin Oncol,1994,12(1):2102-2112.
  • 4Baur M,van Oosterom AT,Di&as V,et al.A phase II trial of docetaxel (Taxotere)as second-line chemotherapy in patients with metastatic breast cancer[J].J Cancer Res Clin Oncol,2008,134 (2):125-135.
  • 5Cohn I,Slack N,Fisher B.Complications and toxic manifestations of surgical adjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer[J].Surg Gynec Obstet,1968,127 (6):1201-1209.
  • 6Fisher B,Ravdin R,Ausman R,et al.Surgical adjuvant chemotherapy in cancer of the breast:results of a decade of cooperative investigation rJ].Ann Surg,1968,168(2):337-356.
  • 7Fisher B,Slack N,Katrych D,et al.Ten year follow-up results of patients with carcinoma of the breast in a co-operative clinical trial evaluating surgical adjuvant chemotherapy[J].Surg Gynecol Obstet,1975,140:528-534.
  • 8Lazarus HM,Reed MD,Spitzer TR,et al.High-dose i.v.thiotepa and cryopreserved autologous bone marrow transplantation for therapy of refractory cancer[J].Cancer Treat Rep,1987,71:689-695.
  • 9Wolff SN,Herzig RH,Fay JW,et al.High-dose thiotepa with autologous bone marrow transplantation for metastatic malignant melanoma:results of phase 1 and 0 studies of the North American Bone Marrow Transplantation Group[J].J Clin Oncol,1989,7:245-249.
  • 10Antman K,Ayash L,Elias A,et al.A phase 11 study of high-dose cyclophosphamide,thiotepa,and carboplatin with autologous marrow support in women with measurable advanced breast cancer re-sponding to standard-dose therapy[J].J Clin Oncol,1992,10 (1):102-110.

二级参考文献8

  • 1Reed E,Kessinger A,Murphy B,et al.Occult tumor cells detected in autologous blood stem cell harvests have no impact on 5 year outcomes for breast cancer patients with 4-9 positive nodes treated with adjuvant high-dose therapy and stem cell transplantation[J].Bone Marrow Transplant,2003,31(7):571.
  • 2Schrama JG,Baars JW,Holtkamp MJ,et al.Phase Ⅱ study of a multi-course high-dose chemotherapy regimen incorporating cyclophosphamide,thiotepa,and carboplatin in stage Ⅳ breast cancer[J].Bone Marrow Transplant,2001,28(2):173.
  • 3Elias AD,Richardson P,Avigan D.et al.A short course of induction chemotherapy followed by two cycles of high-dose chemotherapy with stem cell rescue for chemotherapy naive metastatic breast cancer[J].Bone Marrow Transplant,2001,27(3):269.
  • 4Berry DA,Broadwater G,Klein JP.et al.High-dose versus standard chemotherapy in metastatic breast cancer:comparison of Cancer and Leukemia Group B trials with data from the Autologous Blood and Marrow Transplant Registry[J].J Clin Oncol,2002,20(3):743.
  • 5Bengala C,Pazzagli I,Innocenti F.et al.High-dose thiot-epa and melphalan with hemopoietic progenitor support following induction therapy with epirubicin-paclitaxel- containing regimens in metastatic breast cancer(MBC)[J].Ann Oncol,2001,12(1):69.
  • 6Stuart MJ,Peters WP,Broadwater G.et al.High-dose chemotherapy and hematopoietic support for patients with high-risk primary breast cancer and involvement of 4 to 9 lymph nodes[J].Biol Blood Marrow Transplant,2002,8(12):666.
  • 7Tartarone A,Sirotova Z,Aieta M.et al.Salvage treatment with epirubicin and/or paclitaxel in metastatic breast cancer patients relapsed after high-dose chemotherapy with peripheral blood progenitor cells[J].Tumori,2001,87(3):134.
  • 8许晓华,张晓红,叶招明,李伟栩,苏立达,吕庆华.高剂量化疗联合双次自体外周血干细胞移植治疗骨肉瘤的疗效观察[J].实用癌症杂志,2002,17(1):97-98. 被引量:1

共引文献4

同被引文献259

引证文献21

二级引证文献157

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部