期刊文献+

认知行为护理疗法对抑郁症患者负性情绪和应对方式的影响 被引量:73

Effect of cognitive-behavior nursing intervention on negative sentiment and coping style in depression patients
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨认知行为护理疗法对抑郁症患者负性情绪和应对方式的影响。方法将46例抑郁症患者,随机分为观察组(23例)和对照组(23例),两组均使用抗焦虑、抑郁的药物并实施常规护理,观察组在此基础上实施针对性的认知行为护理疗法。干预前后采用抑郁自评量表(SDS)、焦虑自评量表(SAS)和应对方式问卷(CSQ)对两组患者的负性情绪和应对方式进行评估,并进行对比性分析。结果干预前两组患者CSQ得分比较差异均无统计学意义(P〉0.05);实施认知行为护理疗法3个月后,观察组患者的抑郁、焦虑水平均低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(t=4.22,3.98,P〈0.01);应对方式问卷中“解决问题、求助”因子分高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(t=3.39,P〈0.05;t=5.38,P〈0.01),“自责、回避”因子分低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(t=4.02,P〈0.01;t=3.58,P〈0.05),而“幻想、合理化”因子分则变化不明显,差异无统计学意义(t=0.08,2.39,P〉0.05)。结论认知行为护理疗法能显著改善抑郁症患者的抑郁、焦虑情绪,提高其应对技巧,促进患者康复。 Objective To study the cognitive-behavior nursing intervention on negative sentiment and coping style in depression patients. Methods Forty-six depression patients were randomly divided into intervention group (n =23) and control group (n =23). Both groups received antidepressant drugs,anti-anxiety drugs and conventional care, Other than this, intervention group received cognitive-behavior nursing intervention. All the patients were assessed with Zung' s Self-rating Depression Scale (SDS) ,Zung' s Serf-rating Anxiety Scale (SAS) and Coping Style Questionnaire (CSQ) before and after the intervention. Results Before intervention CSQ cares of the two groups were not significantly different (P 〉0. 05) ;The scores of SDS and SAS in the intervention group were significantly lower than those in the control group(t =4. 22,3.98,P 〈0. 01). The .scores of problem-solving and asking for help in the CSQ increased significantly and scores of self-blame and avoidance decreased in the intervention group as compared to the control group (t =3. 39,P 〈0. 05;t =5. 38,P 〈0. 01 ). But the scores of fancy and rationalization were of no significant difference between the two groups ( t = 0. 08,2. 39, P 〉 O. 05 ). Conclusions The cognitive-behavior nursing intervention has a significant impact on the improvement of negative sentiment and coping style in depression patients thus benefits their rehabilitation.
出处 《中华现代护理杂志》 2011年第4期394-396,共3页 Chinese Journal of Modern Nursing
关键词 抑郁症 认知行为护理疗法 负性情绪 应对方式 Depression Cognitive-behavlor nursing intervention Negative sentiment Coping style
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献23

  • 1谭春英,孙玉玺,马建东.更年期抑郁症患者个性特征及应付方式调查[J].中国健康心理学杂志,2005,13(4):296-297. 被引量:3
  • 2邹韶红,张亚林,黄国平.抑郁症患者的家庭暴力及因素分析[J].中国心理卫生杂志,2005,19(8):539-542. 被引量:4
  • 3汪向东 王希林 骊弘.心理卫生评定量表手册(增订版)[M].北京:中国心理卫生杂志社,1999.220-223.
  • 4赵振文 张国环 张婷婷.我院1998年—2000年抗抑郁药物用药趋势分析[J].中国临床医药研究杂志,2002,64(1):50-50.
  • 5黄恩 施剑英.抗抑郁药的门诊应用情况分析[J].国际中华神经精神医学杂志,2001,2(4):216-216.
  • 6Preskorn SH.Antidepressant drug selection: criteria and options.J Clin Psychiatry, 1994,55(suppl A):6.
  • 7Hickie IB.Choosing antidepressant drugs in general practice.Aust Fam Physician, 2001,30(7): 663.
  • 8Petersen T, Dording C, Neauh NB, et al.A survey of prescribing practices in the treatment of depression.Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry, 2002,26(1):177.
  • 9Ahamura AC, Percudani M.The use of antidepressants for long-term treatment of recurrent depression: rationale, current methodologies, and future directions.J Clin Psychiatry, 1993,54(suppl):29.
  • 10Sclar DA, Robison LM, Skaer TL, et al.Antidepressant pharmacotherapy:economic evaluation of fluoxetine, paroxetine and sertraline in a health maintenance organization.J Iht Med Res, 1995,23(6):395.

共引文献148

同被引文献520

引证文献73

二级引证文献610

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部