期刊文献+

下肢动脉闭塞症的治疗 被引量:4

The treatment of arteriosclerosis obliterans of lower limbs
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨下肢动脉硬化闭塞症的腔内及联合手术治疗及效果。方法回顾性分析48例下肢动脉硬化闭塞、多阶段闭塞及手术后再狭窄者的临床资料。结果对24例患者采取单纯的腔内治疗、(4例例单纯气囊扩张,20加行内置支架),24例采用腔内治疗联合人工血管旁路术及人工血管吻合口狭窄支架术。48例术后症状均有不同程度的改善,间歇性跛行消失或跛行距离增大,静息痛消失或减轻,肢体末端溃疡愈合。ABI较术前明显升高(P<0.01)。46例获3~82个月随访,43例情况良好。结论对下肢动脉缺血性疾病,合理选择血管腔内治疗、腔内治疗联合人工血管旁路术及人工血管吻合口狭窄支架术,可降低并发症率及病死率,术后血管通常率大幅提高。 Objective To study the outcome of endovascular therapy alone or combined prosthetic bypass surgery for arteriosclerosis obliterans of lower limbs.Methods The clinical data of 48 patients with arteriosclerosis obliterans, multiple levels of stenosis and postoperative arterial reocclusion were retrospectively andayzed.Results Endovascular therapy alone was performed in 24 cases, including balloon dialation in 4 patients and plus stent in 20 patients; and combined with prosthetic bypass graft in 24 patients. In 48 patients,rest pain disappeared and the ulcers healed after the operation, and ABI increased gradually after treatment(P0.01). Forty-six patients had regular follow-up for 3 months to 82 months, of whom 43 cases had no recurrence.Conclusions Endovascular therapy alone or combined with surgical treatment is a feasible,safe and effective choice for arteriosclerosis obliterans of lower limbs, and with a low complication rate and quick recovery.
出处 《中国普通外科杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2010年第12期1274-1275,共2页 China Journal of General Surgery
关键词 动脉硬化 闭塞性/外科学 下肢 腔内治疗 Arteriosclerosis Obliterans/surg Lower Extremity Endovascular Therapy
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献71

  • 1谷涌泉,张建,李建新,廖传军,汪忠镐.血管内超声消融治疗下肢缺血4例报告[J].中华老年多器官疾病杂志,2005,4(4):315-316. 被引量:6
  • 2谷涌泉,张建,郭连瑞,李建新,俞恒锡,齐立行,李学锋,崔世军,罗涛,汪忠镐.下肢小腿动脉介入治疗糖尿病足坏疽二例[J].中华普通外科杂志,2006,21(4):312-312. 被引量:9
  • 3王瑞华,金星,吴学君,种振岳,张十一,董典宁.血管腔内介入联合外科手术治疗下肢多节段动脉硬化闭塞症[J].中国普通外科杂志,2006,15(5):324-327. 被引量:39
  • 4谷涌泉,张建,齐立行,李建新,俞恒锡,李学锋,郭连瑞,崔世军,罗涛,汪忠镐.动脉自膨式支架置入治疗下肢缺血[J].中国微创外科杂志,2006,6(11):824-826. 被引量:30
  • 5谷涌泉,张建,俞恒锡,李建新,齐立行,李学锋,郭连瑞,崔世军,罗涛,陈兵,齐一侠,吴英锋,佟铸,汪忠镐.膝下动脉腔内成形术治疗严重下肢缺血[J].中华普通外科杂志,2007,22(2):123-125. 被引量:63
  • 6Cejna M, Thumher S, Illiasch H, et al. PTA versus Palmaz stent in femoropopliteal artery obstructions: A multicenter prospective randomized study. J Vasc. Interv Radiol,2001,12 :23 - 31.
  • 7Dalsing MC, Harris VJ. Intravaseular stents. In: Peripheral Endovascular Interventions. White RA, Fogarty TH, eds. St. Louis : Mosby Year Book Inc, 1996. 315 - 339.
  • 8Grimm J, Muller-Hulsbeck S, Jahnke T, et al. Randomized study to compare PTA alone versus PTA with Palmaz stent placement for femoropopliteal lesions. J Vasc Interv Radiol,2001,12:935 - 942.
  • 9Dormandy JA, Rutherford RB. Management of peripheral arterial disease (PAD). TASC Working Group. TransAtlantic InterSociery Consensus (TASC). J Vasc Surg,2000,31 ( 1 pt 2 ) : S1 - S296.
  • 10Cejna M, Tumher S, llliasch H, et al. PTA versus Palmaz stent in femoropopliteal artery obstructions: a muhicenter prospective randomized study. J Vasc Interv Radiol,2001, 12:23 -31.

共引文献88

同被引文献50

  • 1Finlayson EV, Birkmeyer JD. Operative mortality with elective surgery in older adults[J]. Eft Clin Pract, 2001, 4(4) : 172 - 177.
  • 2Minar E, Pokrajac B, Maca T, et al. Endovascular brachytherapy for prophylaxis of restenosis after femoropopliteal angioplasty : results of a prospective randomized study [ J ]. Circulation, 2000, 102(22) : 2694 -2699.
  • 3Kasapis C, Henke PK, Chetcuti SJ, et al. Routine stent implantation vs. percutaneous transluminal angioplasty in femoropopliteal artery disease: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials[J]. Eur Heart J, 2009, 30(1) :44 -55.
  • 4Sabeti S, Schillinger M, Amighi J, et al. Prmiary pateney of femoropopliteal arteries treated with nitinol versus stainless steel self-expanding stents : propensity score-adjusted analysis [ J ]. Radiology, 2004, 232 (2) :516 - 521.
  • 5Lejay A, Thaveau F, Bajcz C, et al. Evolution of stents for the treatment of femoral artery lesions [ J ]. J Mal Vasc, 2011, 36(3) :169 - 173.
  • 6Gillgren P, Pettersson H, Fernstrom J, et al. Outcome after nitinol stenting in the superficial femoral and popliteat artery in an elderly population [ J ]. Ann Vasc Surg, 2011, 25 (6) : 758 -765.
  • 7Hu H, Zhang H, He Y, et al. Endovascular nitinol stenting for long occlusive disease of the superficial femoral artery in critical limb ischemia : a single-center, mid-term result [ J ] . Ann Vasc Surg, 2011, 25(2) :210 -216.
  • 8Schillinger M, Sabeti S, Loewe C, et al. Balloon angioplasty versus implantation of nitinol stents in the superficial femoral artery[J]. N Engl J Med, 2006, 354 (18) : 1879 - 1888.
  • 9Nishibe T, Kondo Y, Dardik A, et al. Hybrid surgieal and endovascular therapy in multifoca] peripheral TASC D lesions: up to three-year follow-up [ J ]. J Cardiovase Surg, 2009, 50(4) :493 -499.
  • 10BASIL Investigators. Bypass versus angioplasty in severe ischemia of the leg vices ( BASIL ) : muhicenter, randomized controlled trial[J]. Lancet, 2005, 366:1925 -1934.

引证文献4

二级引证文献39

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部