摘要
目的观察比较中药配合经尿道电切术治疗前列腺增生症的疗效。方法将60例前列腺增生症患者随机分为两组，治疗组30例采用经尿道电切术加中药治疗，对照组30例采用单纯经尿道电切术治疗。结果治疗组术后下尿路刺激症状改善明显，术后IPSS评分改善明显优于对照组（P〈0．01）。术后膀胱冲洗时间、术后冲洗量、膀胱痉挛发生率、便秘发生率明显少于对照组（均P〈0．05）。术后留置尿管时间、术后并发再次出血及尿潴留少于对照组，但差异无统计学意义（均P〉0．05）。结论中药配合经尿道电切术治疗前列腺增生症疗效优于单纯经尿道电切术，治疗后不良反应少。
Objective To observe and compare the clinical effect of traditional Chinese medicine （TCM） combined with transurethral resection of prostate（TURP） and simple TURP in treating benign prostatic hyperplasia （BPH）. Methods 60 patients with BPH were randomly divided into two groups. The treatment group（ n = 30） was given the TCM combined TURP and the control group （ n = 30） was given TURP alone. The effects were observed. Results Improvement of lower urinary tract symptoms （LUTS）, the international prostate symptom score（I-PSS） of the treatment group was better than that of the control group with significant difference （ P 〈 0.01 ）. The time and quantity of bladder irrigation, incidence of bladder spasm, incidence of constipation after operation of the treatment group were less than that of the control group with significant difference （all P 〈 0.05 ）. Catheter retention time, post- operative bleeding, urinary retention were less and had no significant difference between the two groups （ all P 〉 0. 05）. Conclusion The effect of TCM combined with TURP was significantly superior to that of simple TURP; and adverse reaction after treatment was less than that in the control group.
出处
《中国基层医药》
CAS
2011年第2期157-158,共2页
Chinese Journal of Primary Medicine and Pharmacy
关键词
前列腺增生症
中药
经尿道前列腺电切术
Benign prostatic hyperplasia
Traditional Chinese medicine
Transurethral resection of prostate
