基于DEA的绿色经济增长核算:以中国地区工业为例被引量：73

An Accounting of Green Economy Growth Based on DEA

导出

摘要本文构建基于DEA的绿色经济增长核算模型,将考虑非期望产出的劳动生产率变化分解为技术效率变化、技术进步和资本深化。中国地区工业的经验分析表明,与发展水平无关且省际差异大的技术无效率普遍存在;各省工业增长的首要源泉是资本深化,其次是技术进步主导的全要素生产率进步;各省工业劳动生产率增长差异主要源于资本深化差异,其次是技术效率变化差异主导的全要素生产率进步差异;如不考虑非期望产出,会低估资本深化对经济增长的贡献,高估技术进步的贡献,而技术效率变化的贡献可能被高估、低估或无影响。 This paper builds an accounting model of green economy growth based on DEA, and the empirical analysis results are as follows： there was technology inefficiency widely which wasn＇t correlative with economic development level and has large provincial difference; the most important source of provincial indus- try growth was capital deepening, then was TFP change dominated by technology change; the provincial growth difference was dominated by capital deepening difference, then was TFP difference dominated by technical efficiency change; if we don＇t consider undesirable output, growth accounting may underestimate the contribution of capital deepening, overstate technology change＇s contribution, and those of technical efficiency change will he overstated, underestimated or ineffective.

作者杨文举

机构地区重庆工商大学长江上游经济研究中心产业经济研究院

出处《数量经济技术经济研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2011年第1期19-34,共16页 Journal of Quantitative & Technological Economics

基金教育部人文社会科学研究基金青年项目"中国工业的动态环境绩效评价与优化研究"(10YJC790332) 教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地重大项目"长江上游地区工业的动态环境绩效优化研究:生态效率视角"(10JJD790028) 2010年度重庆市社会科学规划项目"绿色全要素生产率增长的理论与重庆市的实证研究"的资助

关键词跨期DEA法非期望产出绿色经济增长核算方向性距离函数 InterTemporal Data Envelopment Analysis Undesirable Output Accounting of Green Economy Growth Directional Distance Function

分类号 F064.1 [经济管理—政治经济学]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献15

1Chung, Y., Fare, R., Grosskopf, S., 1997, Productivity and undesirable outputs: a directional distance function approach [J], Journal of Environmental Management, 51 (3): 229-240.
2Farrell, M.J. , 1957, The measurement of productive efficiency[J], Journal of Royal Statistical Society, Series A, 120 (3): 253-290.
3Grosskopf, S., 1993, Efficiency and productivity, In Fried, H.O., Lovell, C.A.K. and Schmidt , S. S. (eds. ) , The Measurement of Productive Efficiency [M], New York, Oxford University Press, 160-194.
4Hailu, A., Veeman, T.S., 2001, Non-parametric productivity analysis with undesirable outputs: an application to the Canadian pul Pand paper industry [J], American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 83 (3).. 605-616.
5Henderson, D.J., Russell, R.R., 2005, Human capital and convergence: a production-frontier approach [J], International Economic Review, 46 (4):1167-1205.
6Kumar, S., Russell, R.R., 2002, Technology change, technological catch-up, and capital deepening : relative contributions to growth and convergence [J], The American Economic Review, 92 (3) : 527-548.
7Murty, S., Russell, R., 2002, On modeling pollution generating technologies. University of California 7Riverside [Z], Working Paper Series, No. 2002-14.
8Oh, D.H. , 2010, A Meta frontier approach for measuring an environmentally sensitive productivity growth index [J], Energy Economics, 32 (1): 146--157.
9Timmer, M.P. , Los, B. , 2005, Localized innovation and Productivity Growth in Asia :An Intertemporal DEA Approach [J].Journal of Productivity Analysis, 23 (1): 47-64.
10陈诗一.能源消耗、二氧化碳排放与中国工业的可持续发展[J].经济研究,2009,44(4):41-55. 被引量：964