期刊文献+

基于贝叶斯网络的燃油控制系统人因安全性定量分析 被引量:3

Quantitative Human Safety Analysis of Fuel Control System based on Bayesian Network
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 通过分析概率安全评价对人因安全性分析的本质需求,比较第一代和第二代人因可靠性分析方法,运用基于人的认知过程分析的安全性分析方法对概率安全评价中的人因事件进行计算分析,并针对传统事件树、故障树分析方法的局限性,采用了贝叶斯网络方法使得整个分析评价过程方便、有效。最后对燃气轮机燃油控制系统进行建模,并选取三种情境进行模拟和灵敏度分析,对相应的结果进行分析讨论,找出了安全性薄弱环节并提出相应的对策。 Considering the fundamental demand of the PSA(Probabilistic Safety Assessment) upon HSA(Human Safety Analysis),compare the first generation(Human Reliability Analysis) with the second generation HRA,the human errors in the PSA were analyzed and calculated by the HAS method based on Human Cognitive.Because of the deficiency of event tree and fault tree,Bayesian network was used to make the whole analysis progress more convenient and efficient.At last,a model was built up to analyze the fuel control system,three cases were simulated and sensitivity analysis was made.The weak parts of system safety were found and corresponding disposals were also proposed.
出处 《燃气轮机技术》 2010年第4期38-43,共6页 Gas Turbine Technology
基金 总装武器装备预研基金项目(9140A27050106JB11) 总装"十一五"装备预先研究项目(513270301)
关键词 概率安全评价 人因安全性 人的认知过程 贝叶斯网络 灵敏度分析 probabilistic safety assessment human safety analysis human cognitive Bayesian network sensitivity analysis
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1肖国清,陈宝智.人因失误的机理及其可靠性研究[J].中国安全科学学报,2001,11(1):22-26. 被引量:68
  • 2Neville Stanton.Human Factors in Nuclear Safety[M].Taylor&Francis Ltd.,1996.
  • 3谢红卫,孙志强,李欣欣,李政仪,张明,史秀建,李龙.典型人因可靠性分析方法评述[J].国防科技大学学报,2007,29(2):101-107. 被引量:54
  • 4Embrey D E.SUM-MAUD; An Approach to Assessing Human Error Probabilities Using Structured Expert Judgment (NUREG/CR-3518)[R].Washington,DC:US Nuclear Regulatory Commission,1984.
  • 5Hanaman G W.Spurgin A J,Lukic Y.Human Cognitive Reliability model for PRA analysis (NUS-4531)[R].Draft EPRI Report,E-lectric Power Research Institute,1984.
  • 6Williams J C.A Data-based Method for Assessing and Reducing Human Error to Improve Operational Performance[C] //Proc.IEEE 4th Human Factor and Power Plants,1988.
  • 7Barriere M,Technical Basis and Implementation Guidelines for a Technique for Human Event Analysis (ATHEANA) (NUREG-1624)[R].Rev.1,Washington,DC:US Nuclear Regulatory Commission,2000.
  • 8Hollnagel E.Cognitive Reliability and Error Analysis Method (CREAM)[M].Elsevier Science Ltd,1998.
  • 9Bieder C,Le Bet P,Desmares E,et al.Mermos:EDF's New Advanced HRA Method[C] International 4th Conference on Probabilistic Safety Assessment and Management,1998.
  • 10孙志强,史秀建,刘凤强,谢红卫.人为差错成因分析方法研究[J].中国安全科学学报,2008,18(6):21-27. 被引量:25

二级参考文献56

共引文献142

同被引文献23

引证文献3

二级引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部