期刊文献+

^18F—FDG SPECT-CT在宫颈癌监测中的价值 被引量:1

The value of ^18F-FDG SPECT-CT in detecting recurrence or metastasis of cervical cancer
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的评价^18F—FDG SPECT-CT在监测宫颈癌复发和(或)转移中的价值。方法回顾性分析为评估宫颈癌是否复发和(或)转移而行^18F—FDG SPECT-CT的62例患者的临床资料,以二次手术或局部活检病理或临床随访为最终结果,并与同期CT和鳞状细胞癌抗原(SCCA)检查结果对比。结果经病理或临床随访证实,62例患者中有36例复发和(或)转移。^18F-FDG SPECT—CT对宫颈癌复发和(或)转移监测的灵敏度、特异度、阳性预测值、阴性预测值及准确率分别为94.4%、92.3%、94.4%、92.3%、93.5%;CT分别为69.4%、80.8%、83.3%、65.6%、74.2%;SCCA检查分别为66.7%、46.2%、63.2%、50.0%、58.1%。结论^18F—FDG SPECT—CT监测宫颈癌复发和(鳓转移有较大临床价值。 Objective To evaluate the value of ^18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (lSF-FDG)SPECT-CT in detecting recurrence and(or) metastasis of cervical cancer. Methods Retrospective analysis of 62 patients who underwent ^18F-FDG SPECT-CT to evaluate recurrence and/or metastasis of cervical cancer at Fujian Tumor Hospital. The diagnostic results were confirmed by second surgery, biopsy or clinical follow-up, and also compared with the coincidence images obtained by CT scan and the serum squamous cell carcinoma related antigen (SCCA) levels. Results It is confirmed that 36 of 62 patients had recurrence and (or) metastasis of cervical cancer by biopsy or clinical follow-up. The sensitivity, specificity, positivity predieitive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and accuracy of lSF-FDG SPECT-CT were 94.4%, 92.3, 94.4%, 92.3% and 93.5%. Those of CT scan were 69.4%, 80.8%, 83.3%, 65.6% and 74.2%. Those of SCCA measurement were 66.7%, 46.2%, 63.2%, 50.0% and 58.1%. Conclusions ^18F-FDG SPECT-CT has greater clinical value to monitor recurrence and(or) metastasis of cervical cancer.
出处 《国际放射医学核医学杂志》 2010年第3期155-158,共4页 International Journal of Radiation Medicine and Nuclear Medicine
关键词 宫颈肿瘤 肿瘤复发 局部 肿瘤转移 体层摄影术 发射型计算机 单光子 体层摄影术 X线计算机 氟脱氧葡萄糖F18 Uterine cervical cancer Neoplasm recurrence,local Neoplasm metastasis Tomography, emission-computed, single-photon Tomography, X-ray computed Fluorodeoxyglucose F18
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

  • 1Jemal A,Murray T,Samuels A,et al.Cancer statistics,2003.CA Cancer J Clin,2003,53(1):5-26.
  • 2Friedlander M,Grogan M.Guidelines for the treatment of recurrent and metastatic cervical cancer.Oncologist,2002,7(4):342-347.
  • 3Waggoner SE.Cervical cancer.Lancet,2003,36(9376):2217-2225.
  • 4Park DH,Kim KH,Park SY,et al.Diagnosis of recurrent uterine cervical cancer:computed tomography versus positron emission tomography.Korean J Radiol,2000,1(1):51-55.
  • 5Schiepers C,Penninckx F,De Vadder N,et al.Contribution of PET in the diagnosis of recurrent colorectal cancer:comparison with conventional imaging.Eur J Surg Oncol,1995,21(5):517-522.
  • 6Grisaru D,Almog B,Levine C,et al.The diagnostic accuracy of ^18F-Fluorodexyglucose PET/CT in patients with gynecological malignancies.Gynecol Oncol,2004,94(3):680-684.
  • 7Rose PG,Adler LP,Rodriguez M,et al.Positron emission tomography for evaluating paraaortic nodal metastasis in locally advanced cervical cancer before surgical staging:a surgicopathologic study.J Clin Oncol,1999,17(1):41-45.
  • 8Chung HH,Jo H,Kang WJ,et al.Clinical impact of integrated PET/CT on the management of suspected cervical cancer recurrence.Gynecol Oncol,2007,104(3):529-534.
  • 9王珍芳,万卫星,郁春景,尤徐阳,陆燕君,杜晓庆,吴娜静.^18F-FDG符合线路显像在结直肠癌术后复发和(或)转移监测中的应用[J].中华核医学杂志,2009,29(1):27-30. 被引量:6

二级参考文献10

  • 1王荣福,杨熊飞,张春丽,张建华,张旭初,付占立,范岩,胡怀湘,王彦福,田红,郭凤琴,徐文怀.符合线路显像在大肠癌术后复发转移中的临床应用[J].中华核医学杂志,2004,24(4):210-212. 被引量:5
  • 2万卫星,尤徐阳,陆燕君,郁春景,王芳军.^(18)F-FDG符合线路显像在卵巢上皮性癌术后监测中的价值[J].中华核医学杂志,2005,25(5):270-273. 被引量:5
  • 3Zubeldia JM, Bednarczyk EM, Baker JG, et al. The economic impact of 18 FDG positron emission tomography in the surgical management of colorectal cancer wlth hepatic metastases. Cancer Biother Radiophaml, 2005, 20: 450-456.
  • 4Choi JY, Lee KS, Kwon OJ, et al. Improved detection of second primary cancer using integrated 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography and computed tomography for initial tumor staging. J Clin Oncol, 2005, 23: 7654-7659.
  • 5Zervos EE, Badgwell BD, Burak WE, et al. Fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography as an adjunct to carcinoembryonic antigen in the management of patients with presumed recurrent colorectal cancer and nondiagnostic radiologic workup. Surgery, 2001, 130: 636-644.
  • 6Flamen P, Hoekstra OS, Homans F, et al. Unexplained rising car- cinoembryonic antigen ( CEA ) in the postoperative surveillance of colorectal cancer: the utility of positron emission tomography (PET). Eur J Cancer, 2001, 37 : 862-869.
  • 7Schiepers C, Penninckx F, De Vadder N, et al. Contribution of PET in the diagnosis of recurrent colorectal cancer: comparison with conventional imaging. Eur J Surg Oncol, 1995, 21 : 517-522.
  • 8Lonneux M, Reffad AM, Detry R, et al. FDG-PET improves the staging and selection of patients with recurrent colorectal cancer. EurJ Nucl Med Mnl Imaging, 2002, 29: 915-921.
  • 9Engd H, Steinert H, Buck A, el al. Whole-body PET:physiological and artifactual fluorodeoxyglucose accumulations. J Nucl Med, 1996, 37 : 441-446.
  • 10Fong Y, Saldinger PF, Akhurst T, et al. Utility of 18F-FDG positron emission tomography scanning on selection of patients for resection of hepatic colorectal metastases. Am J Surg, 1999, 178 : 282- 287.

共引文献5

同被引文献11

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部