期刊文献+

高龄前列腺增生患者2μm激光切除术的围手术期处理

Perioperative management of 2-micron laser resection operation in treating senile patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨2μm激光前列腺切除术治疗高龄前列腺增生患者的围手术期处理。方法 2009年3月~2009年9月采用2μm激光治疗高龄前列腺增生患者31例,年龄为83~95岁,平均87.8岁。激光功率为70W。观察围手术期手术时间、术后拔除尿管时间和膀胱冲洗时间。比较术前、术后血红蛋白和电解质的变化。结果手术时间32~60min,平均45min;拔除尿管时间(2±1)d,膀胱冲洗时间为6h。围手术期未发现心、脑及肺等严重并发症。术前、术后血红蛋白和电解质的无明显变化。结论 2μm激光在治疗高龄前列腺增生患者的优势主要表现在围手术期安全、手术时间短,明显缩短了拔除尿管和膀胱冲洗时间,术后恢复快。 【Objective】We evaluated the Perioperative management of 2 micron continuous-wave laser vaporesection in treating senile patients with obstructive benign prostatic hyperplasia(BPH).【Methods】In this prospective trial,31 senile patients with obstructive BPH treated using a 70w 2-micron continuous-wave laser were enrolled between Mar.2009 and Sep.2009.The mean(range) age of the patients was 87.8(83~95) years.Resection time,bladder irrigation time and catheter time were measured perioperatively and the following variables were assessed before and after vaporesection:bleeding volume and electrolyte changes.【Results】The mean resection time was 45(32-60) minutes.The time of bladder irrigation is 6 h.The mean catheter time was(2 ± 1) days.No severe cardiovascular,cerebral and pulmonary complications occurred during perioperative period.Before and after the patients with electrolyte disturbance and bleeding volume change was not observed(P〉0.05).【Conclusions】2 micron continuous-wave laser of treatment senile patients with BPH has great advantages by safty of peroperative period decreasing resection time,bladder irrigation time and catheter time.
出处 《中国内镜杂志》 CSCD 北大核心 2010年第9期974-976,共3页 China Journal of Endoscopy
关键词 前列腺增生 高龄 2ΜM激光 围手术期 benign prostatic hyperplasia elderly 2-micron laser perioperative period
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献19

  • 1洪宝发,蔡伟,符伟军,杨勇,王威,陈耀富,展洁,张翠娥,李炎唐,崔胜堂.选择性绿激光汽化术治疗良性前列腺增生的临床研究[J].中华泌尿外科杂志,2005,26(1):17-19. 被引量:90
  • 2Uchida T,Ohori M,Soh S,et al.Factors influencing morbidity in patients undergoing transurethral resection of the prostate.Urology,1999 ,53:98-105.
  • 3Anson K.Could the latest generation potassium titanyl phosphate lasers be the ones to make transurethral resection of the prostate an operation of historical interest only? Curr Opin Urol,2004,14:27-29.
  • 4Shingleton WB,Terrell F,Renfroe L,et al.Low-power vs high-power KTP laser:improved method of laser ablation of prostate.J Endourol,1999,13:49-52.
  • 5Hai MA,Malek RS.Photoselective vaporization of the prostate :initial experience with a new 80 W KTP laser for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia.J Endourol,2003 ,17 :93-96.
  • 6Reich O,Bachmann A,Schneede P,et al.Experimental comparison of high power (80 W) potassium titanyl phosphate laser vaporization and transurethral resection of the prostate.J Urol,2004,171 (6 Pt1) :2502-2504.
  • 7Malek RS,Kuntzman RS,Barrett DM.High power potassium-titanyl-phosphate laser vaporization prostatectomy.J Urol,2000,163:1730-1733.
  • 8Te AE,Malloy TR,Stein BS,et al.Photoselective vaporization of the prostate for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia:12-month results from the first United States multicenter prospective trial.J Urol,2004,172(4 Pt 1) :1404-1408.
  • 9Larson TR.Current treatment options for benign prostatic hyperplasia and their impact on sexual function.Urology ,2003,61:692-698.
  • 10Wada S,Yoshimura R,Kyo M,et al.Comparative study of tran.surethral laser prostatectomy versus transurethral electroresection for benign prostatic hyperplasia.Int J Urol,2000 ,7 :373-377.

共引文献212

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部