期刊文献+

经尿道双极等离子体电切治疗高危前列腺增生症:附200例报告 被引量:11

Bipolar plasma kinetic resection of the prostate for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia in the patients with high risk:a report of 200 cases
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的评价经尿道双极等离子体电切治疗高危前列腺增生症的临床效果。方法对200例高危前列腺增生症患者行经尿道等离子切除术,并对其临床资料进行分析。结果手术时间15~115min,平均失血量90rnl,围手术期无患者死亡,无电切综合征发生,无永久性尿失禁。随访3~72个月,排尿功能恢复满意。国际前列腺症状(IPSS)评分由术前28.5分下降至术后平均7.6分。生活质量评分(QOL)由术前5.0分下降到术后平均2.4分。最大尿流率由术前7.2ml/s上升到术后平均18.5ml/s。结论经尿道双极等离子体电切治疗高危前列腺增生症是~种安全有效的方法,但术前充分治疗合并症,使其达到麻醉和手术前要求,术中术后注意监控,及时治疗合并症对保证围手术期安全至关重要。 Objective To evaluate the clinical effect of plasma kinetic resection of the prostate(PKRP)for the treatment of be-nign prostatic hyperplasia(BPH)in the patients with high risk.Methods Two hundred patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia at high risk underwent PKRP.Clinical data were analyzed.Results The operative time was 15-115 min and the average blood loss was 90 ml.No perioperative death,TUR syndrome and permanent urinary incontinence occurred.With 3-72 months follow-up,the uri-nary function was satisfactory.The average of international prostate symptom(IPSS)score dropped from 28.5 points preoperatively to 7.6 points postoperatively.Quality of life score(QOL)declined from 5.0 points preoperatively to a postoperative average of 2.4 points.The maximum flow rate increased from preoperative 7.2 ml/s to postoperative 18.5 ml/s.Conclusions Plasma bipolar transurethral resec-tion of prostatic hyperplasia is a safe and effective method.Adequate treatment of preoperative complications to reach the anesthesia and preoperative requirements and intraoperative and postoperative attention to monitoring and timely treatment is vital for safety.
出处 《中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版)》 2010年第3期28-30,共3页 Chinese Journal of Endourology(Electronic Edition)
关键词 高危 前列腺增生 双极等离子体电切 High risk Benign prostatic hyperplasia Plasma kinetic resection of the prostate
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

二级参考文献39

  • 1阳新华,郑文喜,刘新益,刘劲戈,袁建萍,周惜才.经尿道等离子双极电切术治疗高危前列腺增生症[J].临床泌尿外科杂志,2005,20(7):420-421. 被引量:26
  • 2吴伟江,王行环,王怀鹏,邹伟波,梁晓宇,蔡志高,钟巍巍,邹永锋,袁道彰.经尿道等离子体双极电切与经尿道普通电切对前列腺增生症的疗效比较[J].中华医学杂志,2005,85(47):3365-3367. 被引量:104
  • 3严志强,王强,宣枫.经尿道等离子体双极电切术治疗前列腺增生症100例[J].中国微创外科杂志,2006,6(8):608-610. 被引量:9
  • 4[1]Mcbust W K,Holtgrewe H L,Cockett A T K,et al.Transurethral prostatectomy; Immediate and postoper ative complications. Axooperative study of thirteen par ticipating institution evaluating 3885 patients . J Urol,1989,141: 243- 247.
  • 5[2]Evans J, Singer M,Coppinger S, et al. Cardiovascular performance and core temperature during transurethral prostatectomy. J Urol, 1994,152,2025 2028.
  • 6[3]Freedman M, van Molen S W, Makings E. Blood loss measurement during transurethral resection of the prostate gland. Br J Uro1,1985,57:311-314.
  • 7[4]Ekengren J ,Hahn R G. Blood loss during transurethral resection of the prostate as measured by the hemochrome photometer. J Urol, 1993,42: 501 - 505.
  • 8[5]Narayan P,Tewari A, Croker, et al. Factors affecting sizes and configuration of electrovaporization lesions ing th the prostate. J Uro1,1996,47:679-683.
  • 9[6]Elengren J, Hmhn R G. Complications during transurethral aporization. Urology, 1996,48: 424- 427.
  • 10[7]Henry B,Barre P. Electro-vaporisation of the prostate with the gyrus device. Eur Urol, 2000,37 (Suppl 2): 1 -175.

共引文献439

同被引文献110

引证文献11

二级引证文献68

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部