期刊文献+

禀赋效应的心理机制及其影响因素 被引量:28

The Psychological Mechanism and Influential Factors of Endowment Effect
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 禀赋效应是指个体在拥有某物品时对该物品的估价高于没有拥有该物品时的估价的现象。这一现象在行为经济学中普遍存在。禀赋效应的研究范式包括经典研究范式与物物交换范式。禀赋效应的心理机制主要包括损失规避与查询理论。禀赋效应的影响因素主要包括认知角度、动机、情绪、交易物品的特征、研究设计的选择等。未来的研究需要从禀赋效应的适用条件、产生根源、研究范式的改进等方面进一步探讨。 Endowment effect refers to a phenomenon that people sometimes demand much more to give up an object of their own than they are,or would ever be,willing to pay to acquire the very same object.This phenomenon is universal in behavioral economics.This paper introduced the concepts and research paradigms of endowment effects,including the classical paradigm and barter trade paradigm,and elaborated two psychological mechanism of endowment effect,namely,loss aversion and query theory.Then the paper came to some influential factors of endowment effect,including motivation,emotions,object's character,and study design characteristics.Finally,the issues deserved further research were also outlined,such as the origin and applied conditions of endowment effect.
出处 《心理科学进展》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2010年第4期646-654,共9页 Advances in Psychological Science
关键词 禀赋效应 损失规避 查询理论 endowment effect loss aversion query theory
  • 相关文献

参考文献52

  • 1刘欢,梁竹苑,李纾.行为经济学中的损失规避[J].心理科学进展,2009,17(4):788-794. 被引量:46
  • 2刘欢,梁竹苑,李纾.得失程数的变化:损失规避现象的新视点[J].心理学报,2009,41(12):1123-1132. 被引量:20
  • 3Ariely, D., Huber, J., & Wertenbroch. K. (2005). When do losses loom larger than gains? Journal of Marketing Research, 42, 134-138.
  • 4Becker, G. M., DeGroot, M. H., & Marschak, J. (1964). Measuring utility by a single-response sequential method. Behavioral Science, 9, 226-232.
  • 5Bischoff, I. (2008). Endowment effect theory, prediction bias and publicly provided goods: An experimental study. Environmental and Resource Economics, 39, 283-296.
  • 6Brosnan, S. F., Jones, O. D., Lambeth, S. P., Mareno, M. C.,Richardson, A. S., & Schapiro, S. J. (2007). Endowment effects in chimpanzees. Current Biology, 17, 1-4.
  • 7Carmon, Z., & Ariely, D (2000). Focusing on the forgone: How value can appear so different to buyers and sellers. Journal of Consumer Research, 27, 360-370.
  • 8Gawronski, B., Bodenhausen, G, V., & Becker, A. P. (2007). I like it, because I like myself: Associative self-anchoring and post-decisional change of implicit evaluations. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 43, 221-232.
  • 9Giraud, R. (2007). Money matters an axiomatic exploration of the endowment effect and the preference reversal phenomenon. Working Papers. University of Paris I. Retrieved September 8, 2009, from http://emlab.berkeley.edu/users/webfac/szeidl/e208-f07/gi raud.pdf.
  • 10Hanemann, W. M. (1991). Willingness to pay and willingness to accept: How much can they differ? The American Economic Review, 81,635-647.

二级参考文献71

  • 1沈厚才,徐进,庞湛.损失规避偏好下的定制件采购决策分析[J].管理科学学报,2004,7(6):37-45. 被引量:44
  • 2史金艳,李凯,郁培丽.考虑损失厌恶的最优消费投资决策[J].东北大学学报(自然科学版),2005,26(12):1196-1199. 被引量:5
  • 3Ariely, D., Huber, J., & Wertenbroch, K. (2005). When do losses loom larger than gains? Journal of Marketing Research, 42, 134-138.
  • 4Ariely, D., & Simonson, I. (2003). Buying, bidding, playing, or competing? Value assessment and decision dynamics in online auctions. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 13, 113-123.
  • 5Becker, G.M., DeGroot, M. H., & Marschak, J. (1964). Measuring utility by a single-response sequential method. Behavioral Science, 9, 226-232.
  • 6Brown, T. C. (2005). Loss aversion without the endowment effect, and other explanations for the WTA-WTP disparity. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 57, 367-379.
  • 7Carmon, Z., & Ariely, D. (2000). Focusing on the forgone: how value can appear so different to buyers and sellers. Journal of Consumer Research, 27, 360-370.
  • 8Carrnon, Z., Wertenbroch, K., & Zeelenberg, M. (2003). Option attachment: when deliberating makes choosing feel like losing. Journal of Consumer Research, 30, 15-29.
  • 9Chapman, G. B. (1998). Similarity and reluctance to trade. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 11, 47-58.
  • 10Chen, M. K., Lakshminarayanan, V., & Santos, L. R. (2006). How basic are behavioral biases? Evidence from capuchin monkey trading behavior. Journal of Political Economy, 114, 517-537.

共引文献62

引证文献28

二级引证文献335

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部