摘要
目的探讨男性青少年暴力犯罪者的Stroop测试特点。方法根据一般情况问卷调查、青少年暴力危险性定式评估（SAVRY）及面谈，将少教所男性服教人员分为有攻击行为组（n=71）和无攻击行为组（n=38）分别进行Stroop测验（CWT）。结果有攻击行为组与无攻击行为组比较，在年龄、受教育年限、扶养人情况、个人健康状况、家庭类型、经济状况及犯罪类型方面的差异无统计学意义（P〉0．05），但前者在学校受处分的次数明显多于后者，差异具有统计学意义（P=0．002）。两组在Stroop测试（CWT）中的黑色汉字卡（卡2）修改次数（P=0．040）和四种颜色汉字卡（卡4）修改次数（P=0．033）两个成绩的比较，差异具有统计学意义（P〈0．05）。结论有攻击行为组在Stroop测验中表现纠错能力差，提示暴力攻击行为者存在在认知功能方面的缺陷。
Objective To explore the characteristics of the Stroop test in male juvenile criminals. Methods One hundred and nine male juvenile criminals were divided into the aggressive group （n= 71） and the nonaggressive group （n= 38） by psychiatrists using structured interview for juvenile mental disorder and the Structured Assessment of violence Risk in Youth （SAVRY）. All subjects were tested by the Stroop test （CWT）. Results In age, years of education, the situation of the foster parents, healthy condition, family type and economic condition, the differences between the two groups were not significant （P 〉 0.05）. But the aggressive group had significantly more school punishments than the nonaggressive group （P = 0. 002）. There was a significant difference between the two groups in the numbers of adaptation in black han Chinese card （P = 0. 040） and in four-colour han Chinese card （P = 0. 033）. Conclusions The aggressive group has poor error correcting capability in the Stroop test, suggesting that the aggressive juvenile criminals have defects in cognitive function
出处
《神经疾病与精神卫生》
2009年第6期470-472,共3页
Journal of Neuroscience and Mental Health
基金
科技部“十一五”科技支撑计划项目（2007BA117803）
国家自然科学基金项目（30800368）
关键词
青少年
暴力犯罪
攻击行为
认知功能
Juvenile
Criminal assault
Attack behavior
Cognize function
