期刊文献+

直肠癌手术病人不同麻醉方法的效果比较 被引量:5

Cost-effectiveness of different methods of anesthesia for colorectal surgical procedures
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的比较直肠癌手术病人单纯全麻和硬膜外复合全麻的效果。方法择期行直肠癌手术病人40例,年龄18~78岁,性别不限,ASA Ⅰ或Ⅱ级,随机分为2组(n=20):单纯全麻组(Q组)和硬膜外复合全麻组(EQ组)。两组静脉注射咪达唑仑、芬太尼、丙泊酚、维库溴铵麻醉诱导,气管插管后机械通气。Q组静脉泵入瑞芬太尼和丙泊酚维持麻醉;EQ组静脉泵入瑞芬太尼和丙泊酚的同时,间断硬膜外注射利多卡因和布比卡因维持麻醉;两组间断静脉注射维库溴铵维持肌松。术毕入PACU,Q组采用病人自控静脉镇痛;EQ组采用病人自控硬膜外镇痛。记录苏醒时间、拔管时间、PACU停留时间;记录瑞芬太尼、丙泊酚、肌松药和血管活性药物的用量;记录VAS评分情况;记录术后不良反应的发生情况;计算麻醉有关费用。结果与Q组比较,EQ组苏醒时间、拔管时间和PACU停留时间缩短,瑞芬太尼、丙泊酚、肌松药用量减少,麻醉总费用减少(P<0.05)。血管活性药物的用量、各时点镇痛效果和不良反应发生率差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论与单纯全麻相比,直肠癌手术病人硬膜外复合全麻药物用量少,术后苏醒快,术后早期镇痛效果好,且麻醉费用亦减少。 Objective To compare the cost-effectiveness of simple general anesthesia and general anesthesia com- bined with epidural book in patients undergoing colorectal surgical procedures. Methods 40 ASA physical status Ⅰ-Ⅱ , aged 18--78 years old, undergoing colorectal surgery were randomly assigned two groups (n=20). Q group was anesthetized with GA. EQ group with GA&CEA. Propofol, fentanyl, midazolam and vecuronium were administered for induction of anesthesia in the two groups, followed by propofol and remifentanil by continuous infusion via a tail vein catheter. Muscle relaxation was achieved with vecuronium. Meanwhile, lidocaine and bupivacaine were used for epidural injection in EQ group. All the patients were sent into PACU after operation. PCIA was used in the Q group, and PCEA in the EQ group. All the data were recorded, including awakening time, time of extubation and staying in PACU, drug dosage, scores of VAS, postoperative adverse reaetions and costs of anesthesia. Results Comparing Q group, the patients in EQ group spent shorter time of awakening, extubation and staying in PACU, less dosage of remifentanil, propofol and vecuronium, less costs of anesthesia (P〈0.05). There were no significant differences in dosage of vascular active drug, analgesic effect and incidence of postoperative adverse reactions (P〉0. 05). Conclusion There are lots of advantages in the colorectal surgeries with general anesthesia combined continuous epidural anesthesia,
出处 《西部医学》 2010年第3期474-476,共3页 Medical Journal of West China
关键词 全身麻醉 硬膜外麻醉 麻醉费用分析 直肠癌外科手术 General anesthesia Continuous epidural anesthesia Anesthesia cost analysis Colorectal surgery
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献27

  • 1贾宝森,张宏.异氟醚及七氟醚复合麻醉下老年患者脑氧饱和度与术后认知功能的关系[J].中华麻醉学杂志,2004,24(5):348-351. 被引量:43
  • 2段华,夏恩兰,赵艳,成九梅,于丹,王永军,郑杰,彭雪冰.腹腔镜子宫肌瘤剔除手术的相关因素分析[J].中国妇产科临床杂志,2004,5(5):325-328. 被引量:25
  • 3Moraca RJ,Sheldon DG,Thirlby RC. The role of epidural anesthesia and analgesia in surgical practice. Ann of Surg, 2003,238:663-673.
  • 4Rosenfeld BA, Beattie C, Christopherson R, et al. The effects of different anesthetic regimens on fibrinolysis and the development of postoperative arterial thrombosis. Anesthesiology, 1993,79:435-443.
  • 5Georgiadis D, Berger A, Kowatschev E, et al. Predictive value of S-100beta and neuron-specific enolase serum levels for adverse neurologic outcome after cardiac surgery. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg,2000,119:138- 147.
  • 6Bryson GL, Wyand A. Evidence-based clinical update: general anesthesia and the risk of delirium and postoperative cognitive dysfunction. Can J Anaesth, 2006,53:669-677.
  • 7Rasmussen LS, Johnson T, Kuipers HM, et al. Does auaesthesia cause postoperative cognitive dysfunction? A randomised study of regional versus general anaesthesia in 438 elderly patients. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand, 2003,47 : 260-266.
  • 8Bekker AY, Weeks EJ. Cognitive function after anaesthesia in the elderly. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol, 2003,17:259-272.
  • 9Rohan D, Buggy D J, Crowley S, et al. Increased incidence of postoperative cognitive dysfunction 24 hr after minor surgery in the elderly.Can J Anaesth, 2005, 52:137-142.
  • 10Spahr-Schopfer I, Vutskits L, Toni N, et al. Differential neurotoxic effects of propofol in dissociated cortical cells and organotypic hippocampal cultures. Anesthesiology, 2000,92:1408-1417.

共引文献229

同被引文献37

引证文献5

二级引证文献18

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部