期刊文献+

两种不同手术入路治疗不稳定Hangman骨折的比较 被引量:12

Comparison of two approaches in the treatment of unstable Hangman's fractures
原文传递
导出
摘要 [目的]比较颈后路多节段椎弓根螺钉内固定术与颈前路钢板内固定术两种手术方法治疗不稳定Hangman骨折的临床疗效。[方法]32例不稳定Hangman骨折患者,其中男21例,女11例,年龄17~65岁,平均43.4岁。按Levine-Edwards分类,其中Ⅱ型骨折15例,ⅡA型骨折14例,Ⅲ型骨折3例。脊髓损伤按Frankle分级:D级4例,E级28例。所有患者受伤至手术时间1~15 d,平均5 d。采用颈后路多节段椎弓根螺钉内固定术治疗18例,颈前路钢板内固定术治疗14例,对两组患者的手术时间、术中出血量、手术并发症、骨折愈合情况及脊髓功能恢复情况进行比较分析。[结果]两组在手术时间[颈后路椎弓根螺钉内固定组平均(121±20)min、颈前路钢板内固定组平均(116±13)min]、术中出血量[颈后路椎弓根螺钉内固定组平均(360±25)ml、颈前路钢板内固定组平均(320±21)ml]、骨折愈合情况[颈后路椎弓根螺钉内固定组均获骨性愈合(无畸形愈合)、颈前路钢板内固定组均获骨性愈合("鹅颈"畸形1例)]及脊髓功能恢复情况方面差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);手术并发症[颈后路椎弓根螺钉内固定组出现1例(静脉丛损伤1例)、颈前路钢板内固定组出现6例(喉上神经损伤4例、颈部切口血肿1例、食管损伤1例)]方面差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。[结论]颈后路多节段椎弓根螺钉内固定术是治疗不稳定Hangman骨折较理想的方法。 [Objective]To compare the method and outcome for unstable Hangman's fractures through posterior pedicle screw poly-segmental fixation and anterior cervical fusion and plate fixation.[Method]There were 32 patients with unstable Hangman's fractures,including 21 males and 11 females,aged from 17 to 65 years with an average of 43.4 years.According to the classification system designed by Levine and Edwards,they were divided into type Ⅱ(n=15),type ⅡA(n=14)and type Ⅲ(n=3).According to Frankel scale,graded as spinal injury D(n=4)and E(n=28).The time from injury to the index operation was from 1 to 15 days(mean,5 days).Eighteen cases of unstable Hangman's fractures were treated with posterior pedicle screw poly-segmental fixation and 14 cases through anterior cervical fusion and plate fixation.The surgical time,blood loss,complication,union and neurological function were compared.[Result]The surgical time was(121±20)min for posterior pedicle screw fixation group,and(116±13)min for anterior cervical fusion and plate fixation group.And the blood loss was(360±25) VS(320±21)ml.All the cases in the posterior pedicle screw fixation group achieved bony fusion without deformity.In the anterior cervical fusion and plate fixation group,all cases achieved bony fusion with one case of "goose neck" deformity.Neurological function between the two groups showed no statistical different significance(P〉0.05).One case developed hemorrhage of venous plexus in the posterior pedicle screw fixation group.And complications occurred in 6 cases(4 of superior nerve injury,1 of intra-incision hematoma and 1 of esophageal injury).There were significant differences between 2 groups(P〈0.05).[Conclusion]Posterior pedicle screw poly-segmental fixation is an ideal method for unstable Hangman's fractures.
出处 《中国矫形外科杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2010年第4期280-283,共4页 Orthopedic Journal of China
关键词 HANGMAN骨折 枢椎 椎弓根螺钉 内固定 Hangman's fractures axis pedical screw internal fixation
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1Choi WG, Vishtec AG, Baskin JJ, et al. Completely dislocated Hangman's fracture with a loched C2 - 3 facet. Case report [ J ]. J Neurosurg, 1997,5:757 -760.
  • 2Buchowski JM, Riley LH 3^rd. Epidural hematoma after immobilization of a "Hangman's" fracture : case report and review of the literature [ J]. Spine J,2005,3:332 - 335.
  • 3Muller E J, Wick M, Muhr G. Traumatic spondylolisthesis of the axis : treatment rationale based on the stability of the different frature types [J]. Eur Spine J,2000,2:123 - 128.
  • 4Kotani Y, Cunningham BW, Abumi K, et al. biomechanical analysis of cervical stabilization systems. An assessment of transpedicular screw fixation in the cervical spine [ J]. Spine, 1994,22:2529 -2539.
  • 5Abumi K, Shono Y, ho M, et al. Complications of pedicle screw fixation in reconstructive surgery of the cervical spine [ J ]. Spine, 2000, 8:962 - 969.
  • 6解京明,张漾杰,王迎松,张颖,鲁宁.颈椎弓根螺钉内固定在下颈椎骨折中的应用[J].中华创伤骨科杂志,2007,9(5):497-498. 被引量:12
  • 7解京明,王迎松,张颖,鲁宁,曹锦,张漾杰.下颈椎椎弓根螺钉置钉技巧探讨[J].中国矫形外科杂志,2007,15(10):745-748. 被引量:14
  • 8Abumi K, Itoh H, Taneichi H,et al. Transpedicular screw fixation fortraumatic lesions of the middle and lower cervical spine : description of the techniques and preliminary report [ J]. J Spinal Disord, 1994,1: 19 -28.
  • 9Jones EL, Heller JG, Silcox DH, et al. Cervical pedicle screws versus lateral mass screws. Anatomic feasibility and biomechanical comparison[ J]. Spine, 1997,9:977 - 982.
  • 10Hirano T, Hasegawa K, Takahashi HE,et al. Structural characteristics of the pedicle and its role in screw stability[ J]. Spine, 1997,21: 2540 - 2549.

二级参考文献18

  • 1毛广平,赵建宁,王与荣,陈跃先,黎介寿,邱大学.三维定位器置钉方法的研究[J].中国矫形外科杂志,2005,13(18):1404-1407. 被引量:11
  • 2解京明,张漾杰,鲁宁,刘宗良,王迎松,张颖.下颈椎经椎弓根螺钉内固定相关解剖学观察[J].脊柱外科杂志,2006,4(6):354-358. 被引量:18
  • 3Allen BL Jr, Ferguson RL, Lehman TR, et al. A mechanistic classification of closed, indirect fractures and dislocations of the lower cervical spine. Spine, 1982, 7: 1-27.
  • 4Karaikovic EE, Yingsakmongkol W, Gaine Jr RW. Accuracy of cervical screw placement using the funnel technique. Spine, 2001, 26: 2456-2462.
  • 5Miller RM, Ebraheim NA, Xu R, et al. Anatomic consideration of transpedicular screw placement in the cervical spine: an analysis of two approaches. Spine, 1996, 21: 2317-2322.
  • 6Lugwig SC, Kramer DL, Balderston RA, et al. Placement of pedicle screws in the human cadaveric cervical spine: comparative accuracy of three techniques. Spine, 2000, 25: 1655-1667.
  • 7Ludwig S, Kowalski J, Edwards C, et al. Cervical pedicle screws -Comparative accuracy of two insertion techniques. Spine, 2000, 25: 2675-2681.
  • 8Panjabi M, Shin E, Chen N, et al. Internal morphology of human cervical pedicles. Spine, 2000, 25:1197-1205.
  • 9Abumi K,Shono Y,Ito M,et al.Complications of pedicle screw fixation in reconstructive surgery of the cervical spine[J].Spine,2000,25(8):962 -969.
  • 10Sakamoto T,Neo M,Nakamura T.Transpedicular screw placement evaluated by axial computed tomography of the cervical pedicle[J].Spine,2004,29 (23):2510-2514.

共引文献20

同被引文献84

引证文献12

二级引证文献39

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部