期刊文献+

乳腺组织MR扩散加权成像中GRAPPA技术的应用 被引量:5

Diffusion-weighted MRI of the Breast with GRAPPA:Initial Experience
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:评价在乳腺磁共振扩散加权成像(DWI)中应用全自动校准部分并行采集(GRAPPA)技术对改善图像质量及乳腺组织表观扩散系数(ADC)值测量的影响。方法:分别对28例女性乳腺MR受检者进行平面回波(EPI)序列的常规DWI和GRAPPA-DWI检查。常规DWI检查时扩散梯度因子(b)值取800s/mm2,GRAPPA-DWI检查时b值分别取800、1000s/mm2。比较不同参数条件下的图像质量分级、信噪比(SNR)及乳腺组织ADC值,并进行统计学分析。结果:在相同b值(b=800s/mm2)条件下,GRAPPA-DWI组图像质量明显优于常规DWI组,乳腺组织的SNR高于常规DWI组,两组差异均有显著性意义(P<0.01),乳腺的平均ADC值略低于常规DWI组,但两组差异无显著性意义(P>0.05)。在GRAPPA-DWI组中,b值为800s/mm2组图像质量略优于b值为1000s/mm2组,但二者差异无显著性意义(P>0.05),而b值为800s/mm2组乳腺组织的SNR高于b值为1000s/mm2组,两组差异有显著性意义(P<0.01),b值为800s/mm2时乳腺组织的ADC值略高于b值为1000s/mm2时,差异有显著性意义(P<0.05)。结论:GRAPPA技术的应用有助于改善乳腺DWI的图像质量,提高信噪比,并且不会影响乳腺组织ADC值的测量。 Objective:To evaluate prospectively the improvement of the image quality with the use of generalized autocalibrating partially parallel acquisitions (GRAPPA) in diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) of the breast and its effect on apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) measurements. Methods:Twenty-eight women underwent echo-planar (EPI)-DWI of the breast with conventional phase encoding and with GRAPPA,respectively. The b value of 800s/mm2 was used in conventional DWI group, while two b values of 800 and 1000s/mm2 were used in GRAPPA-DWI groups. Image quality, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and ADC values of breast were compared with different series at the same b value of 800s/mm2 and with different b values of 800 and 1000s/mm2 in GRAPPA DWI groups. Matched-pairs Wileoxon signed rank test was used for statistical analysis. Results: Higher image quality score and SNR value of the breast were obtained in GRAPPA-DWI group than those in conventional DWI group with the same b value of 800s/mm2 and the differences were statistically significant (P〈0.01). The mean ADC of breast in GRAPPA-DWI group was lower than that in conventional DWI group with the same b value of 800s/mm2,but there was no significant difference between the two sequences for breast ADC measurement (P〉0.05). In GRAPPA-DWI groups, the image quality score at b value of 800s/mm2 was slightly higher than that at b value of 1000s/mm2 and there was no significant difference between them (P〉0.05). The SNR value and the mean ADC of breast at b value of 800s/mm2 were higher than those at b value of 1000s/mm2 in GRAPPA-DWI groups and the differences were statistically significant (P〈0.05). Conclusion: GRAPPA is useful in improving image quality and SNR of EPI- DWI of breast without compromising ADC measurements.
出处 《放射学实践》 北大核心 2010年第2期164-168,共5页 Radiologic Practice
关键词 磁共振成像 扩散 并行采集技术 乳腺 Magnetic resonance imaging, diffusion weighted Parallel acquisition technique Mammary glands, human
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

  • 1Mukherjee P, Bahn M, Mckinstry RC, et al. Differences between Gray Matter and White Matter Water Diffusion in Stroke:Diffusion tensor MR Imaging in 12 Patients[J].Radiology, 2000,215(1) :211- 220.
  • 2Guo Y, Cai YQ, Cai ZL, et al. Differentiation of Clinically Benign and Malignant Breast Lesions Using Diffusion-weighted Imaging [J]. J Magn Reson Imaging,2002,16(2) : 172- 178.
  • 3Sinha S, Lucas-Quesada FA, Sinha U, et al. In Vivo Diffusionweighted MRI of the Breast: Potential for Lesion Characterization[J]. J Magn Reson Imaging, 2002,15(6) : 693-704.
  • 4Blaimer M, Breuer F, Mueller M, et al. SMASH, SENSE, PILS, GRAPPA:how to Choose the Optimal Method[J]. Top Magn Reson Imaging, 2004,15 (4) : 223-236.
  • 5Friedman PD, Swaminathan SV, Smith R. SENSE Imaging of the Breast[J].AIR,2005,184(2) :448-451.
  • 6Pruessmann KP, Weiger M, Scheidegger MB, et al. SENSE: Sensitivity Encoding for Fast MRI[J]. Magn Reson Med, 1999,42(5):952-962.
  • 7Kurihara Y, Yokushiji YK, Tani I, et al. Coll Sensitivity Encoding in MR Imaging: Advantages and Disadvantages in Clinical Prae tice[J]. Am J Roentgenol,2002,178(5) :1087-1091.
  • 8陈武凡.并行磁共振成像的回顾、现状与发展前景[J].中国生物医学工程学报,2005,24(6):649-654. 被引量:19
  • 9于曰俊,张国华,侯金文.磁共振并行采集技术的临床应用[J].中国中西医结合影像学杂志,2007,5(5):366-368. 被引量:5
  • 10杨姗,曾蒙苏,张志勇,金航,陈财忠,沈继章,李轫晨,张利军.单次屏气及自由呼吸TSENSE技术对心功能测量及图像质量的评价[J].放射学实践,2007,22(7):714-717. 被引量:2

二级参考文献60

  • 1王秀彬,胡振民.磁共振成像相阵控线圈及并行成像技术[J].医疗卫生装备,2005,26(6):19-20. 被引量:18
  • 2陈武凡.并行磁共振成像的回顾、现状与发展前景[J].中国生物医学工程学报,2005,24(6):649-654. 被引量:19
  • 3[1]Lin FH,Wald LL,Ahlfors SP,et al.Dynamic magnetic resonance inverse imaging of human brain function[J].Magn Reson Med,2006,56(4):787-802.
  • 4[2]Glockner JF,Hu HH,Stanley DW,et al.Parallel MR imaging:a user's guide[J].Radiographics,2005,25(5):1279-1297.
  • 5[3]Weiger M,Pruessmann KP,Boesiger P.2D SENSE for faster 3D MRI[J].MAGMA,2002,14:10-19.
  • 6[4]Nakamura M,Ikeda N,Tsuboko T,et al.Clinical usage of parallel imaging of head three-dimensional MR image for analysis of VSRAD:a comparison of imaging statistical analytic results in SENSE acquisition method shortening acquisition time versus conventional acquisition method[J].Nippon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi,2006,62(10):1456-1462.
  • 7[5]Noebauer-Huhmann IM,Glaser C,Dietrich O,et al.MR imaging of the cervical spine:assessment of image quality with parallel imaging compared to non-accelerated MR measurements[J].Eur Radiol,2007,17(5):1147-1155.
  • 8[6]Frydrychowicz A,Bley TA,Winterer JT,et al.Accelerated time-resolved 3D contrast-enhanced MR angiography at 3T:clinical experience in 31 patients[J].MAGMA,2006,19(4):187-195.
  • 9[7]Zenge MO,Vogt FM,Brauck K,et al.High-resolution continuously acquired peripheral MR angiography featuring partial parallel imaging GRAPPA[J].Magn Reson Med,2006,56(4):859-865.
  • 10[8]Nael K,Fenchel M,Salamon N,et al.Three-dimensional cerebral contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance venography at 3.0 Tesla:initial results using highly accelerated parallel acquisition[J].Invest Radiol,2006,41(10):763-768.

共引文献42

同被引文献42

  • 1高佩虹,赵斌.乳腺肿瘤的MRI诊断[J].国外医学(临床放射学分册),2005,28(1):36-38. 被引量:3
  • 2赵斌,蔡世峰,高佩虹,彭洪娟.MR扩散加权成像鉴别乳腺良恶性病变的研究[J].中华放射学杂志,2005,39(5):497-500. 被引量:146
  • 3胡文娟,张蓓,潘玉林,谢蕴,刘维燕.磁共振灌注成像对局部进展期乳腺癌新辅助化疗疗效的评价[J].放射学实践,2011,26(1):25-29. 被引量:18
  • 4娄路馨,彰俊杰,时高峰.MR扩散加权成像对乳腺良恶性疾病的应用研究[J].临床放射学杂志,2007,26(4):350-353. 被引量:45
  • 5Kinkel K, Hylton NM. Challenges to interpretation of breastMRI[ J]. J Magn Reson Imaging, 2001,13(6) ; 821 -829.
  • 6Yeh ED, Slanetz PJ, Edmister WB, et al. Invasive lobularcarcinoma : spectrum of enhancement and morphology on mag-netic resonance imaging [ J ]. Breast J,2003,9(1): 13-18.
  • 7Kvistad KA, Rydland J, Vainio J, et al . Breast lesions: e-valuation with dynamic contrast - enhanced T1 - weighted MRimaging and with T2 * - weighted first - pass perfusion MRimaging[J]. Radiology, 2000, 216(2) : 545 -553.
  • 8Furman - Haran E,Margalit R, Grobgeld D, et al. Dynamiccontrast — enhanced magnetic resonance imaging reveals stress-induced angiogenesis in MCF7 human breast tumors [ J ].Proc Natl Acad Sci, 1996, 93(13) : 6247 -6251.
  • 9Planey CR, Welch EB, Xu L, et al. Temporal samplingrequirements for reference region modeling of DCE - MRI datain human breast cancer[ J]. J Magn Reson Imaging, 2009,30(1) : 121 -134.
  • 10GuoY,Cai YQ, CalZL,et al. Differen tiation of clinical-ly ben ign and malignant breast lesions using diffusion -weighted imaging [ J ]. JMagn Reson Imaging, 2002, 16(2) : 172 -178.

引证文献5

二级引证文献21

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部