期刊文献+

走低碳发展之路:中国碳税政策的设计及CGE模型分析 被引量:106

原文传递
导出
摘要 应对气候变化,中国需要走可持续发展的"低碳之路",这就需要实施政治上可行、经济上有效的环境经济政策。本文根据环境经济学的基本理论结合中国国情,探讨了基于污染量控制的排污权交易与基于价格变化的碳税机制的优缺点,得出碳税政策更适合当前中国国情的结论,并对碳税设计中的税基、税率设定与动态调整、中性税收条件下税收返还、减排激励与补贴以及碳税对居民影响及分配公平等问题展开了讨论。然后,本文基于2005年的社会核算矩阵对中国近期实施碳税政策进行了系统的动态CGE模型分析。 It is necessary for China to implement politically feasible, economically efficient instruments to combat with global climate change and shift to a low-carbon development pathway. In this paper, the author applies basic environmental economics theory to compare quantity-based cap-and-trade and price-based carbon tax policy, and conclude that carbon tax is more appropriate for China in the near term. The author also discusses various designing factors for carbon tax reform in China, including tax base, tax rate and dynamic adjustment, revenue recycling, abatement incentives and subsidies and likely tax incidences and distribution impacts. Then based on China's 2005 Social Accounting Matrix, the paper uses a recursive dynamic CGE model to analyze the likely impacts of carbon tax on both economy and environment in China. The model simulations suggest that, carbon tax can effectively internalize carbon externality, and bring substantial co-benefits in terms of reducing traditional local pollutants and associated health damages, meanwhile the negative impacts on the economy can be restricted with appropriate tax rate regime. Furthermore, we also compare the welfare impact of carbon tax under two different revenue-neutral recycling regimes. The paper finds that if carbon tax revenue is recycled through lump-sum transfer to the households, though consumption will increase due to the cash incentives, the overall negative impact on the economy is larger. On the contrary, if carbon tax revenue is recycled through rebating other more distorted taxes in the second-best world, overall tax distortions can be reduced thus less negative impacts on the economy, but environmental benefits are slightly lower than the previous case.
作者 曹静
出处 《金融研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2009年第12期19-29,共11页 Journal of Financial Research
基金 国家自然科学基金(项目编号70803026) 清华大学低碳经济研究院-低碳经济课题(L08E01)的资助 清华财政税收研究所对本文的项目支持
关键词 低碳经济 碳税 CGE模型 中性税收 low-carbon economy, carbon tax, CGE model, revenue-neutral
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

  • 1Cao et al. (2007), "Essays on Environmental Tax Policy Analysis: Dynamic Computable General Equihbrium Approaches Applied to China," Harvard Public Policy Ph.D. thesis, Boston.
  • 2Cao, J. , R. Garbaccio and M. Ho (2009) "Benefits and Costs of SO2 Abatement Policies in China," Review of Environmental Economies and Policy, Vol 3, No. 2, pp. 231 -250.
  • 3Cao, J. , M. Ho and D. Jorgenson (2009) "The Local and Global Benefits of Green Tax Pohcies in China," Review of Environmental Economic and Policy, Vol 3, No. 2, pp. 189 -208.
  • 4Edenhofer, O. , R. pietzcker, M. Kalkuhl and E. Kriegler, (2008), "Taxation Instruments for Reducing Greenhouse Gas Emission, and Comparison with Quantity Instruments," Draft Paper prepared for the midterm review of the project "China Economics of Climate Change" on December 14 - 15, 2008 in Beijing, China.
  • 5Goulder, L , ( 1995), "Environmental Taxation and the ' Double Dividend' : A Reader' s Guide," International Tax and Public Finance, August, Vol 2, No. 2, pp. 157-183.
  • 6Metcalf G. and D. Weisbach, (2009), "The Design of a Carbon Tax," Harvard Environmental Law Review, Vol 33, No. 2, 499 - 506.
  • 7Nordhaus W. , (2006) , " After Kyoto: Alternative Mechanisms to Control Global Warming," AEA Papers and Proceedings, Vol 96, No. 2, 31 -34.
  • 8Pearee, D. , ( 1991 ) , "The role of carbon taxes in adjusting to global warming," Economic Journal, Vol 101, No. 407, 938 - 948.
  • 9Xie, J. , (1995) , "Environmental Policy Analyses: An Environmental Computable General Equilibrium Model for China," Ph.D. Dissertation, Comell University.
  • 10Weitzman, M. , (1974), "Prices vs. Quantities," Review of Economic Studies, Vol 61, No. 4, 477 - 491.

二级参考文献44

  • 1陈文颖,高鹏飞,何建坤.二氧化碳减排对中国未来GDP增长的影响[J].清华大学学报(自然科学版),2004,44(6):744-747. 被引量:87
  • 2李践.论奥康娜在《难民》中的写作风格[J].外国文学研究,1999,21(2):31-33. 被引量:3
  • 3张建立.弗兰纳里·奥康纳其人其作[J].外国文学,1995(1):44-45. 被引量:22
  • 4翟凡 李善同 等.中国经济的可计算一般均衡模型[J].数量经济技术经济研究,1996,(3):38-44.
  • 5[8]Manne A, Mendelsohn R, Richels R. MERGE: a model for evaluating regional and global effects of GHG reduction policies. Energy Policy, 1995, 23(1):17 ~ 34.
  • 6[9]Goulder L. Effects of carbon taxes in an economy with prior tax distortions: an inter-temporal general equilibrium analysis. Journal of environmental economics and management, 1995, 29:271~297.
  • 7[10]Farmer K, K Steininger. Reducing CO2 emissions under fiscal retrenchment: a multi-cohort CGEmodel for Austria. Environmental and resource economics, 1998, 12:255~288.
  • 8[11]Gottinger H. Greenhouse gas economics and computable general equilibrium. Journal of policy modeling, 1998, 20(5):537~580.
  • 9[12]Zhang Z. Macroeconomic effects of CO2 emission limits: a computable general equilibrium analysis for China. Journal of policy modeling, 1998, 20(2):213 ~250.
  • 10[13]Garbaccio R, M Ho, D Jorgenson. Controlling carbon emissions in China. Environment and development economics, 1999, 4:493~518.

共引文献376

同被引文献1519

引证文献106

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部