职业技能培训对农村居民非农收入的影响被引量：132

The Effect of Vocational Training on Non-farming Incomes

导出

摘要本文应用异质性处理效应模型方法研究了珠江三角洲农村的职业培训,发现:(1)村民的不可观察变量在村民的参与决策和收入获得中发挥了重要的作用;(2)不可观察变量使得那些最有可能参加培训的村民从培训中获得的边际收益最低,反而那些不太可能参加培训的村民的边际收益最高;(3)参加者的处理效应低于平均处理效应,而后者又低于未参加者的处理效应。我们的实证结果隐含的政策建议是政府应该吸引和动员那些不参加职业培训难以提高工资收入的村民参加培训。 Applying heterogenous treatment effect model, this paper estimates the treatment effects of vocational training in rural Guangdong province. We find that （1） the unobservables play an important role for the villagers to decide whether or not participate the training programs, （2） In terms of unohservables, those most likely to partieipate benefit the least from the programs and those not likely to participate benefit the most, （3） the treatment effect for the treated is lower that the average treatment effect and the latter is lower than the treatment effect for untreated. The empirical result suggests the training programs should help the villagers with observed and unobserved characteristics that make them the least likely to increase their non-farming incomes without training.

作者王海港黄少安李琴罗凤金

机构地区中央财经大学经济学院山东大学经济研究院华南农业大学广东农村政策研究中心国家统计局广东调查总队

出处《经济研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2009年第9期128-139,151,共13页 Economic Research Journal

基金中央财经大学"211"工程三期重点学科建设经费国家社科基金重大课题"我国地区间居民收入分配差距研究"(05&ZD031) 国家社会科学基金(06CJY012) 广东省自然科学基金(06300504)的资助

关键词职业培训异质性选择偏差分类收益 Vocational Training Heterogeneity Selection Bias Sorting Gain

分类号 F323.8 [经济管理—产业经济] G719.2 [文化科学—职业技术教育学]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献20

1黄祖辉,俞宁.失地农民培训意愿的影响因素分析及其对策研究[J].浙江大学学报（人文社会科学版）,2007,37(3):135-142. 被引量：91
2Aakvik, Arild, James Heckman, Edward Vytlacil, 2005, "Estimating Treatment Effects for Discrete Outcomes When Responses to Treatment Vary: An Application to Norwegian Vocational Rehabilitation Programs", Journal of Econometrics, 125:15--51.
3Bjorklund, Anders, Robert Moffitt, 1987, "The Estimation of Wage Gains and Welfare Gains in Self-selection Models", Review of Economics and Statistics 69( 1 ) : 42--49.
4Carneiro, Pedro, James Heckman, and Edward Vytlacil, 2000, "Estimating the Return to Education When It Varies among Individuals", University of Chicago working paper.
5Ehrenberg, Ronald G. and Smith, Robert S., 2000, Modem Labor Economics: Theory and Public Policy, Addison Wesley Longman, Inc., Massachusetts.
6Friedlander, Daniel, David Greenberg, Philip Robins, 1997, " Evaluating Government Training Programs for the Economically Disadvantaged", Journal of Economlcs Literature, Vol. 45, No.4, pp. 1809--1855.
7Heekman, James and Edward Vytlacil, 1999, "Local Instrumental Variables and Latent Variable Models for Identifying and Bounding Treatment Effects", National Academy of Sciences 96, 4730--4734.
8Heckman, James and Edward Vytlacil, 2000, "The Relationship between Treatment Parameters within A Latent Variable Framework", Economics Letters 66( 1 ) :33--39.
9Heckman, James and Edward Vytlacil, 2005, "Structural Equations, Treatment Effects, and Economic Policy Evaluation", Econometrica, Vol. 73, No. 3 (May, 2005), 669--738.
10Heckman, James, LaLonde, R., Smith, J. , 1999, "The Economics and Econometrics of Training Programs", In Ashenfelter, O., Card, D. (Eds), Handbook of Labor Econometrics, Vol. III. North-Hzliand, Amsterdam.