期刊文献+

腹腔镜下行子宫肌瘤剔除术80例分析 被引量:6

在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 子宫肌瘤是最常见的妇科良性疾病,常见于30—50岁的妇女,至少20%的育龄妇女有子宫肌瘤。随着人们生活质量的提高,越来越多的妇女选择保留子宫,行子宫肌瘤剔除术。与开腹手术相比,腹腔镜手术具有术后恢复快、切口小、愈合好、术后发病率少等优点,因而更易于为女性患者接受。本文对在本院行腹腔镜下子宫肌瘤剔除术80例进行回顾性分析。现总结报道如下。
出处 《黑龙江医药》 CAS 2009年第5期713-714,共2页 Heilongjiang Medicine journal
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献27

  • 1毛嘉平,刘霞.妇科腹腔镜手术中转开腹的原因分析[J].浙江医学,2005,27(9):687-688. 被引量:10
  • 2Hulka JF, Parker WH, Surrey MW, et al. Management of ovarian masses AAGL 1990 survey. J Reprod Med, 1992,37:599-602.
  • 3Sokol AI, Chuang K, Milad ME Risk factors for conversion to laparotomy during gynecologic laparoscopy. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc, 2003,10:469-473.
  • 4Visco AG, Barber MD, Myers ER. Early physician experience with laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy and rates of surgical compllcations and conversion to laparotomy. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2002,187 : 1008-1012.
  • 5Cibula D, Ungar L, Palfalvi L, et al. Laparoscopic abdominal radical trachelectomy. Gynecol Oncol, 2005,97:707-709.
  • 6Mamitz S, Kohler C, Roth C, et al. Is there a benefit of pretreatment laparoscopic transperitoneal surgical staging in patients with advanced cervical cancer? Gynecol Oncol, 2005,99: 536-544.
  • 7Steed H, Rosen B, Murphy J, et al. A comparison of laparoscopic-assisted radical vaginal hysterectomy and radical abdominal hysterectomy in the treatment of cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol, 2004,93:588-593.
  • 8Roy M, Plante M, Renaud MC. Laparoscopically assisted vaginal radical hysterectomy. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol, 2005, 19 : 377 -386.
  • 9Rouzier R, Pomel C. Update on the role of laparoscopy in the treatment of gynaecological malignancy. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol, 2005,17:77-82.
  • 10Gil-Moreno A, Diaz-Feijoo B, Roca I, et al. Total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy with intraoperative sentinel node identification in patients with early invasive cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol, 2005,96 : 187-193.

共引文献43

同被引文献48

  • 1刘新民.妇产科手术学[M].第3版北京:人民卫生出版社.2004.191.
  • 2Miller CE. Myomectomy. Comparison of open and laparoscopic techniques [ J ]. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am,2000,27 (2) :407420.
  • 3Okolo S. Incidence, aetiology and epidemiology of uterine fibroids [ J ]. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaeeo1,2008 ,22 (4) :571-588.
  • 4Wen KC, Chen YJ,Sung PL, et al. Comparing uterine fibroids treated by myomectomy through traditional laparotomy and 2 modified ap- proaches : ultraminilaparotomy and laparoscopically assisted Ltltraminilaparotomy [ J ]. Am J Obstet Gyneco1,2010,202 (2) : 144. e1-e8.
  • 5Warren L, Ladapo JA, Borah B J, et al. Open abdominal versus laparoseopic and vaginal hysterectomy : analysis of a large United States payer measuring quality and cost of care[ J]. J Minim Invasive Gynecol,2009,16(5) :581-588.
  • 6Mittapalli R, Fanning J, Flora R, et al. Cost-effectiveness analysis of the treatment of large leiomyomas : laparoscopic assisted va- ginal hysterectomy versus abdominal hysterectomy [ J ]. Am J Obstet Gynecol,2007,196 ( 5 ) : el 9-e21.
  • 7Simon NV, Laveran RL, Cavanaugh S, et al. Laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy vs. abdominal hysterectomy in a community hospital. A cost comparison[ J]. J Reprod Med,1999,44(4) :339-345.
  • 8Ellstrrm M, Ferraz-Nunes J, Hahlin M, et al. A randomized trial with a cost-consequence analysis after laparoscopic and abdomi- nal hysterectomy [ J ]. Obstet Gynecol, 1998,91 ( 1 ) :30-34.
  • 9Lumsden MA ,Twaddle S, Hawthorn R, et al. A randomised comparison and economic evaluation of laparoscopic-assisted hyster- ectomy and abdominal hysterectomy[ J]. BJOG,2000,107( 11 ):1386-1391.
  • 10Simha R,Hegde A,Mahajan C,et al. Laparoscopic my- omectomy : Do size,mumber, and location of the myomas form limiting foetots for laparoseopie muomectomy[J]. J Minim Invasive Gyneeol, 2008,15 (3) : 292-300.

引证文献6

二级引证文献41

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部