期刊文献+

审计委员会与信息披露质量:来自中国上市公司的经验证据 被引量:58

The Relationship between Audit Committees and Disclosure Quality:Evidence from China
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 本文选择深交所信息披露考评结果与证券分析师盈余预测精度作为上市公司信息披露质量的衡量指标,使用2006年深市上市公司的相关数据,实证检验了审计委员会与上市公司信息披露质量之间的关系。研究发现,与未设置审计委员会的上市公司相比,设立审计委员会的上市公司具有更高的信息披露质量,审计委员会的独立性对提高上市公司信息披露质量有着积极的促进作用。本文的政策含义是,在进一步完善资本市场的过程中应重视上市公司审计委员会建设。 The audit committee system is a very important institutional arrangement in the corporate governance structure. Foreign research suggests that the audit committee should play an active role in strengthening internal control auditing and control over financial reporting while ensuring the authenticity as well as reliability of financial reports. Therefore, audit committees should lead to an improvement in the quality of information disclosure. The audit committee system was introduced into China in 2002. While there is already some literature that discusses the efficiency of audit committees in Chinese listed companies, very little of that literature focuses on the relationship between audit committees and disclosure quality. In this paper we empirically examine whether this system improves the quality of information disclosure of listed companies in China, and the relationship between the independence of audit committees and the quality of information disclosure. Taking into account the difficulties inherent in the direct measurement of the quality of information disclosure, we employ two variables as agent variables of disclosure quality: (1) the degree of disclosure published by the Shenzhen Stock Exchange (SZSE); and (2) financial analysts' forecast accuracy as suggested by Lang et al. (2003). We then evaluate the effects of audit committees on disclosure quality using a firm-level dataset comprised of 428 listed companies. It is found that audit committees improve listed companies' disclosure quality. Furthermore, there is a positive statistical relationship between the independence of audit committees and disclosure quality. These results pass a series of robustness checks. Our research implies that the Chinese system of audit committees is to some extent effective, but still needs further improvement. The policy implication to be drawn from this analysis is that more attention should be paid to the audit committee system during the creation of efficient capital markets in China.
出处 《南开管理评论》 CSSCI 北大核心 2009年第4期120-127,共8页 Nankai Business Review
基金 国家社会科学基金(09BJL023) 教育部新世纪优秀人才支持计划资助
关键词 审计委员会 独立性 公司治理 信息披 露质量 Audit Committee Corporate Governance Disclosure Quality
  • 相关文献

参考文献20

  • 1Zahra, Shaker., John A. Pearce.. Boards of Directors and Corporate Financial Performance: A Review and Integrative Model, Journal of Management, 1989, Vol. 15, No. 2, pp.291-334.
  • 2Beasley M, An.. A Empirical Analysis of the Relation between the Board of Director Composition and Financial Statement Fraud,The Accounting Review, 1996, Vol.71, No.4, pp.443-465.
  • 3McMullen, D. A.. Audit Committee Performance: An Investigation of the Consequences Associated with Audit Committees,Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 1996, Vol. 15, Iss.1 pp. 87-103.
  • 4Simon S. M. Ho., Kar Shun Wong.. A Study of the Relationship between Corporate Governance Structures and the Extent of Voluntary Disclosure, Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, 2001, Volume 10, Issue 2, pp.139-156.
  • 5Kalbers, L., Fogarty, T.. Audit Committee Effectiveness: An Empirical Investigation of the Contribution of Power. Auditing :A Journal of Practice and Theory, 1993, Vol.12, No.1, pp. 24-49.
  • 6Collier, P. A.. The Rise of the Audit Committee in UK Quoated Companies: A Curious Phenomenon, Accounting, Business and Financial History, 1996, Vol.6, No.2, pp.121-140.
  • 7Collier, E A., Alan, Gregory. Audit Committee Activity and Agency Costs. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 1999, Vol.18, Issues4-5, pp.311-332.
  • 8钟伟强,张天西.公司治理状况对自愿披露水平的影响[J].中南财经政法大学学报,2006(1):62-68. 被引量:32
  • 9杨忠莲,杨振慧.独立董事与审计委员会执行效果研究——来自报表重述的证据[J].审计研究,2006(2):81-85. 被引量:96
  • 10王雄元,管考磊.关于审计委员会特征与信息披露质量的实证研究[J].审计研究,2006(6):42-49. 被引量:74

二级参考文献87

共引文献254

同被引文献896

引证文献58

二级引证文献532

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部