期刊文献+

Ⅲ期肺癌不同治疗模式的探讨 被引量:1

Different treatment modalities of patients with stage lU lung cancer
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨Ⅲ期肺癌在不同治疗模式下的远期疗效,以提高患者生存率,改善预后。方法回顾性分析北京市结核病胸部肿瘤研究所自1995-2004年10年间1921例不同病理类型的Ⅲ期肺癌患者在不同治疗模式下的远期疗效并进行比较分析。结果在不同治疗模式下,以手术为主(辅以化、放疗)的综合治疗组606例、单纯手术组317例和非手术组998例,其1、3、5年生存率比较分别为66.0%、62.7%、51.2%;32.3%、21.4%、8.2%和19.3%、13.2%、4.2%。以手术为主的综合治疗组1、3、5年生存率高于单纯手术组和非手术组,其中综合治疗组和单纯手术组与非手术组比较1、3、5年生存率差异均有统计学意义(均P〈0.01)。结论根治性肿瘤切除,同时辅以化、放疗的综合治疗是Ⅲ期肺癌有效的治疗模式。 Objective In order to improve the survival-rates and study the long-term therapeutic effect of stage Ⅲ lung cancer patients with different treatment modalities. Methods From 1995 to 2004, 1921 patients of stage Ⅲ lung cancer treated at our hospital were retrospectively analyzed to compare the long- term therapeutic effect of different treatment modalities. There were 606 cases in the combined therapy group (mainly surgical with combined treatment of chemotherapy & radiotherapy) , 317 cases in the surgery alone group and 998 cases in the non-surgical group. The 1, 3, 5-year survival rates of these three groups were 66. 0% ( 400/606 ) vs 62. 7 % ( 199/317 ) vs 51.2% ( 511/998 ), 32. 34% ( 196/606 ) vs 21.45 % ( 68/317 ) vs 8. 15% (81/998), 19.31% (117/606)vs 13.2% (42/317) vs 4.2% (42/998)respectively. In comparison, 1, 3,5-year survival rates of the combined therapy group was higher than the surgery alone and non-surgical groups; Significant differences in 1-year survival rates were found between the combined therapy group and the surgery alone group or the non-surgical group (P 〈 0. 01 ) and significant differences in 3, 5- year survival rates among these three groups. Conclusion The combined therapy of radical resection with chemotherapy and radiotherapy is the best treatment modality for stage Ⅲ lung cancer.
出处 《中华医学杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2009年第29期2056-2058,共3页 National Medical Journal of China
关键词 肺肿瘤 治疗结果 存活率 Lung neoplasms Treatment outcome Survival rate
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献20

  • 1Mountain CF. Revisions in the international system for staging lung cancer. Chest, 1997, 111:1710-1717.
  • 2Cerfolio R J, Bryant AS. Surgical techniques and results for partial or circumferential sleeve resection of the pulmonary artery for patients with non-small cell lung cancer. Ann Thorae Surg, 2007, 83 : 1971-1978.
  • 3Spaggiari L, Leo F, Veronesi G, et al. Superior vena eava resection for lung and mediastinal malignancies: A single-center experience with 70 eases. Ann Thorae Surg, 2007,83:223-230.
  • 4Ratto GB, Roberta C, Giuseppe V. Twelve-year experience with left atrial resection in the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer. Ann Thorae Surg, 2004,78:234 -237.
  • 5Rendina EA, Venuta F. Reconstruction of the pulmonary artery// Pearson FG, Cooper JD, Deslauriers J, et al. Thoracic Surgery. 2^nd. Philadelphia : Churchill Livingstone, 2002 : 1013- 1027.
  • 6Osaki T, Sugio K, Hanagiri T, et al. Survival and prognostic factors of surgically resected T4 non-small cell lung cancer. Ann Thorac Surg, 2003,75 : 1745-1751.
  • 7Lucchi M, Viti A, Melfi F, et al. ⅢB-T4 non-small cell lung cancer: indications and results of surgical treatment. J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino) , 2007, 48: 369-374.
  • 8Sharger JB, Larabright ES, McGrath CM, et al. Lobectomy with tangential pulmonary artery resection without regard to pulmonary function. Ann Thorac Surg, 2000, 70 : 234-239.
  • 9Spaggiari L, Thomas P, Magdeleinat P, et al. Superior vena eava resection with prosthetic replacement for non-small cell lung cancer: long-term results of a muhicentric study. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg, 2002, 21:1080-1086.
  • 10Shah SS,Thompson J,Goldstraw P.Results of operation without adjacent therapy in the treatment of small cell lung cancer.Ann Thorac Surg,1992,54:498-501.

共引文献9

同被引文献8

引证文献1

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部