期刊文献+

327例初次人工髋关节置换术失败原因探讨 被引量:16

An investigation on failure mechanisms of primary 327 hip arthroplasties
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨初次人工髋关节置换术后失败的原因及相关危险因素。方法回顾性分析1988年11月至2008年7月收治的327例人工髋关节初次翻修手术患者的病史、临床和影像学资料以及手术记录。结果以髋关节翻修术作为终止点,共分析327例行初次髋关节翻修术的患者资料,具体失败原因包括假体无菌性松动(226/327,69.1%)、感染(52/327,15.9%)、假体周围骨折(22/327,6.7%)、假体不稳定(17/327,5.2%)、假体柄断裂(5/327,1.5%)、髋臼内衬脱落(5/327,1.5%)。结论假体无菌性松动和感染是初次髋关节置换失败的主要机制,手术适应证和假体选择不当以及外科理念及技术局限是造成失败的关键因素。 Objective To summarize the detailed failure mechanisms of revision hip arthroplasties and related risk factors. Methods From November 1988 to July 2008 revision of total hip artbroplasties was performed in 327 patients. The medical history, clinical and imaging material and operation records were investigated. Results Regarding revision as the end point of the study, the reasons for 327 revision arthroplasties were aseptic loosening in 226 hips (69. 1% ), infection in 52 hips ( 15.9% ) , periprosthetic fracture in22 hips (6.7%), instability in 17 hips (5.2%), stem fracture in 5 hips (1.5%) and liner dissociation in 5 hips ( 1.5% ). Conclusions The main failure mechanisms of primary hip arthroplasties are aseptic loosening and infection of implants, which could be attributed to improper selection of operation indications and implants and limitations to surgical philosophy and technique.
出处 《中华外科杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2009年第3期168-171,共4页 Chinese Journal of Surgery
关键词 关节成形术 置换 治疗失败 危险因素 Arthroplasty,replacement, hip Treatment failure Risk factors
  • 相关文献

参考文献29

  • 1Berger RA, Kull LR, Rosenberg AG, et al. Hybrid total hip arthroplasty: 7-to 10-year results. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 1996 (333) : 134-146.
  • 2Callaghan JJ, Tooma GS, Olejniezak JP, et al. Primary hybrid total hip arthroplasty: an interim followup. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 1996 ( 333 ) : 118-125.
  • 3Clohisy JC, Harris WH. Primary hybrid total hip replacement, performed with insertion of the acetabular component without cement and a precoat femoral component with cement: an average ten-year follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 1999, 81: 247 -254.
  • 4Eisler T, Svensson O, Tengstrom A, et al. Patient expectation and satisfaction in revision total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty, 2002, 17:457-462.
  • 5Berry D J, Harmsen WS, Cabanela ME, et al. Twenty-five year survivorship of two thousand consecutive primary Charnley total hip replacements: factors affecting survivorship of acetabular and femoral components. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 2002, 84 : 171-177.
  • 6Fumes O, Lie SA, Espehaug B, et al. Hip disease and the prognosis of total hip replacements. A review of 53,698 primary total hip replacements reported to the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register 1987-99. J Bone Joint Surg Br, 2001, 83:579-586.
  • 7R~der C, Eggli S, Aebi M, et al. The validity of clinical examination in the diagnosis of loosening of components in total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br, 2003, 85:37-44.
  • 8DeLee JG, Charnley J. Radiological demarcation of cemented sockets in total hip replacement. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 1976 ( 121 ) :20-32.
  • 9Gruen TA, McNeice GM, Amstutz HC. "Modes of failure" of cemented stemtype femoral components: a radiographic analysis of loosening. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 1979 ( 141 ) : 17-27.
  • 10Harris WH, McGann WA. Loosening of the femoral component after use of the medullary-plug cementing technique. Follow-up note with a minimum five year follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 1986, 68 : 1064-1066.

二级参考文献13

共引文献36

同被引文献161

引证文献16

二级引证文献63

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部