期刊文献+

从工程社会学的视角看工程决策的双重逻辑 被引量:10

Analysis on the Dual-logic of Engineering Decision-making from Engineering-sociology Perspective
原文传递
导出
摘要 从工程社会学的视角解读工程决策是工程社会发展的需要。作为工程活动核心环节的工程决策是决策主体针对工程目标和工程问题进行的权衡、设计和选择。工程决策是指向未来的、非线性的社会系统决策。从决策主体、过程和影响因素分析,工程决策有社会决策和技术决策两个层次,前者是工程的合理性和合法性决策,体现的是价值合理性;后者是工程的可能性和可行性决策,体现的是工具合理性。两种决策逻辑交织在一起,其中工程的社会决策影响和决定着工程的技术决策。 It is the need of the development of engineering--sociology to interpret engineering decision making from the engineering-sociology perspective. Engineering decision-making, the core-link of engineering activities, means that the decision subject aims at the balance, design, and choice of engineering objects and engineering issues. Engineering decision-making refers to make decision to the future, non-linear social system decision. From the angle of decision subject, process and effected factors, engineering decision-making includes two levels called social decision-making and technical decision-making respectively, the former is engineering decision-making of rational and legal, which embodies value rationality, the latter is the possibility and feasibility, which embodies tools rationality. The dual logic of the two kinds interweave togerher, the social decision-making affects and decides technical decision-making.
出处 《自然辩证法研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2009年第1期76-80,共5页 Studies in Dialectics of Nature
基金 2007国家社科基金项目(07BZX028)的阶段成果
关键词 工程社会学 工程决策 社会决策 技术决策 engineering-sociology engineering decision social decision-making technical decision-making
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献9

  • 1李伯聪.工程哲学引论[M].郑州:大象出版社,2002.414.
  • 2Pratnush Sen, Jian-bo Yang. Multiple Criteria Decision Support in Engineering Design[M]. Springer,1998. 1, 212.
  • 3James Parkin. Management Decisions for Engineers [M]. Thomas Telford, 1996. 117, 100.
  • 4拉尔夫·L 基尼.创新性思维—实现核心价值的决策模式[M].北京:新华出版社,2003.2-3.
  • 5James Armstrong, Ross Dixon, Simom Rob;nsom. The Decision Makers: Ethics for Engineers[M]. Thomas Teford, 1999. 30.
  • 6约瑟夫-本-戴维.科学家在社会中的角色[M].成都:四川人民出版社,1988.151.
  • 7Andrew Feenberg. From Essentialism to Constructivism: Philosophy of Technology at the crossroads[EB/OL] www-rohan[J], edu/faculty/feenberg/talk4./html
  • 8Loka Institute. Dannish-styIe citizen-based deliberative "consensus conferences" on science & technology policy world[EB/OL], http:// www.loka. org/ pages/woldpanels. htm, 2004-10-14/2006-01-05.
  • 9安维复.2005—工程与哲学的5点共识[N].学习时报,2005-12-05(7).

共引文献16

同被引文献93

引证文献10

二级引证文献30

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部