期刊文献+
任意字段
题名或关键词
题名
关键词
文摘
作者
第一作者
机构
刊名
分类号
参考文献
作者简介
基金资助
栏目信息

植物乳杆菌HO-69的口腔益生性质研究 被引量：8

Probiotic characteristics of Lactobacillus plantarum HO-69 applied in oral cavity
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的研究植物乳杆菌HO-69在口腔中的益生性质。方法在体外模拟口腔硬组织,研究菌株对牙面与牙本质的黏附率;以MATH法确定其表面疏水性与电荷,推测菌株对口腔软组织的黏附率;以杯碟法研究其抑菌活性。结果植物乳杆菌HO-69菌株对于模拟牙面与牙本质的黏附率非常低,具有较高的表面疏水性、酸碱电荷与良好抑菌活性。结论植物乳杆菌HO-69引发龋病与促进龋病发展的概率很低,具有广谱的抑菌活性,是潜在的口腔益生菌。 Objective To investigate the probiotic characteristics of Lactobacillus plantarum （L.plantarum） HO-69 in oral cavity. Methods The adhesion ratios to teeth and dentine surface were determined by in vitro models. Hydrophobicity and surface charges were measured by MATH method. Inhibitory activity was measured by agar well diffusion method. Results The adhesion ratios to hard tissue were quite low. The hydrophobicity and surface charges were high, and it exhibited inhibitory activity against some pathogens. Conclusion The probability is low for L. plantarum HO-69 to initiate or accelerate dental caries. It shows broad-spectrum inhibitory activity and is potential probiotics applied in oral cavity.
作者 杨颖 陈卫 张灏 汤坚
机构地区 江南大学食品学院食品科学与技术国家重点实验室 浙江省农业科学院食品加工研究所
出处 《华西口腔医学杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2008年第5期482-485,489,共5页 West China Journal of Stomatology
关键词 植物乳杆菌 口腔 黏附 抑菌谱 Lactobacillus plantarum： oral cavity： adhesion： inhibitory spectrum
分类号 R780.2 [医药卫生—口腔医学]
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

  • 1Peter HA, Nicholas SM, Elisabeth MS. Bergey's manual of systematic bacteriology[M]. 2nd ed. Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins Co, 1986: 1209-1234.
  • 2杨颖,陈卫,汤坚,张灏.健康与龋病口腔唾液中乳杆菌的发酵类群与表面性质[J].中国微生态学杂志,2005,17(5):344-345. 被引量：7
  • 3杨颖,陈卫,田丰伟,张灏,汤坚.产抑菌物质乳杆菌的筛选及性质的研究[J].工业微生物,2006,36(3):13-17. 被引量：15
  • 4詹玲,刘天佳,岳松龄,张静仪,肖晓蓉,吉庆勇.变形链球菌对唾液获得性膜粘附机理的研究Ⅰ.变形链球菌表面粘结素粗提方法的比较[J].华西口腔医学杂志,1998,16(1):73-75. 被引量：11
  • 5Liu T, Gibbons Pj, Hay DI. Streptococcus crlcetus and Streptococcus rattus bind to different segments of collagen molecules[J]. Oral Microbiol Immunol, 1990, 5(3): 143-148.
  • 6Rosenberg M, Judes H, Weiss E. Cell surface hydrophobicity of dental plaque microorganisms in situ[J]. Infect Immun, 1983, 42 (2) : 831-834.
  • 7Geertsema FL, Van der Mei HC, Busscher HJ. Microbiol cell surface hydrophobicity. The involvment of electrostatic interactions in microbiol adhesion to hydrocarbons (MATH)[J]. J Microbiol Meth, 1993, 18 (1) : 61-68.
  • 8中华人民共和国卫生部.中华人民共和国药典[M].广州:广东科技出版社.2000:附10.
  • 9Gibbons R J, Hay DI, Cisar JO, et al. Adsorbed salivary proline-rich protein 1 and stathein: Receptors for type 1 fimbriae of Actinomyces viscosus T14V-J1 on apatitic surfaces[J]. Infect Immun, 1988, 56(11) :2990-2993.
  • 10Sookkhee S, Chulasiri M, Prachyabrued W. Lactic acid bacteria from healthy oral cavity of Thai vohmteers: Inhibition of oral pathogens[J]. J Appl Microbiol, 2001, 90(2): 172-179.

二级参考文献22

  • 1文立亚,岳松龄,蔡美英,高巽坤,张传彬.变形链球菌细胞表面及培养上清液中抗原提取的比较[J].华西口腔医学杂志,1993,11(1):13-14. 被引量：1
  • 2杨颖,陈卫,汤坚,张灏.健康与龋病口腔唾液中乳杆菌的发酵类群与表面性质[J].中国微生态学杂志,2005,17(5):344-345. 被引量：7
  • 3詹玲，牙体牙髓牙周病杂志，1995年，5卷，4期，240页
  • 4Peter HA, Nicholas SM, Elisabeth MS. Bergey's manual of systematic bacteriology [M]. Vol. 2. Baltimore, MD: Williams and Wilkins Co. g 1986. 1209-1234.
  • 5Ahola AJ, Yli-Knuuttila, Suomalainen T, et al. Short-term consumption of probiotic-containing cheese and its effect on dental caries risk factors [J]. Arch Oral Biol, 2002,47: 799-804.
  • 6Nase Gatajja K,Savalahti E,Saxelin M,et al. Effect of long-term consumption of a probiotic bacterium,lactobacillus GG,in milk on dental caries and caries risk in children[J]. Caries Res, 2001,35:412-420.
  • 7Sookkhee SM, Chulasiri, Prachyabrued W. Lactic acid bacteria from healthy oral cavity of Thai volunteers:inhibition of oral pathogens[J]. J App Mic, 2001,90:172-179.
  • 8Rosemberg M, Judes H, Weiss E. Cell surface hydrophobicity of dental plaque microorganisms in situ[J]. Infect Immun, 1983,42:831-834.
  • 9Geertsema FL,Van der Mei HC,Busscher HJ. Microbial cell surface hydrophobicity. The involvment of electrostatic interactions in microbial adhesion to hydrocarbons (MATH) [J ]. J Microbiol Meth,1993,18:61-68.
  • 10Switalski LM,Butcher WG. An in vitro model for adhesion of bacteria to human tooth root surfaces[J]. Archs Oral Biol, 1993,39:155.

共引文献30

同被引文献102

  • 1刘坤,高宁,王翼川,王昌美,王晓毅,高庆红,宣鸣,温玉明.口腔癌术后放疗患者口腔菌群的变化[J].华西口腔医学杂志,2005,23(2):128-129. 被引量：23
  • 2刘冬梅,李理,杨晓泉,梁世中.用牛津杯法测定益生菌的抑菌活力[J].食品研究与开发,2006,27(3):110-111. 被引量：281
  • 3杨颖,陈卫,田丰伟,张灏,汤坚.产抑菌物质乳杆菌的筛选及性质的研究[J].工业微生物,2006,36(3):13-17. 被引量：15
  • 4陈伟,佟卉春,东秀珠.一株口腔链球菌新种—寡发酵链球菌产过氧化氢特性的研究[J].微生物学报,2006,46(5):820-822. 被引量：6
  • 5SVANTE T, CHIRSTINA S B. Probioties and oral health effects in children[ J]. Paediatr Dent,2008,18( 1 ) :3-10.
  • 6MEURMAN J H, ANTILA H, SALMINEN S. Recovery of Lactobacillus strain GG (ATCC 53103 ) from saliva of healthy volunteers after consumption of yoghurt prepared with the bacterium [ J ]. Microb Ecol Health Dis, 1994,7 (3) :295-298.
  • 7YLI-KNUUTTILA H, KARl K, MEURMAN J H. Colonization of Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG in the oral cavity[J]. Oral Microbiol Immunol,2006,21 (2):129-131.
  • 8PHAM L C,van-SPANNING R J, ROLING W F. Effects of probiotic Lactobacillus salivarius W24 on the compositional stability of oral microbial communities[ J]. Arch Oral Biol,2009,54( 2 ) : 132-137.
  • 9HE F, OUWEHAND A C, ISOLAURI E. Differences in composition and mucosal adhesion of bifidobacteria isolated from healthy adults and healthy seniors[ J]. Curr Microbiol,2001,43 ( 3 ) :351-354.
  • 10HAUKIOJA A, YLI-KNUUTTILA H, LOIMARANTA V. Oral adhesion and survival of probiotic and other lactobacilli and bifidobacteria in vitro[ J]. Oral Mierobiol Immuno,2006,21 (34) :326-332.

引证文献8

二级引证文献23

华西口腔医学杂志
2008年 第5期

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部