期刊文献+

子宫颈癌伴盆腔淋巴结转移患者的复发及预后分析 被引量:17

Analysis of recurrence pattern and prognosis of patients with cervical carcinoma and pelvic lymph node metastasis
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨宫颈癌伴盆腔淋巴结转移患者的复发规律及预后影响因素。方法选取1994年1月至2001年12月间中山大学肿瘤防治中心收治的按国际妇产科联盟(FIGO)的标准其临床分期为Ⅰb1~Ⅱa期的宫颈癌伴盆腔淋巴结转移的患者共124例,结合临床病理资料对其复发及预后情况进行回顾性分析。结果患者的5年总生存率和5年无瘤生存率分别为63.3%、61.4%;总复发率为39.5%(49/124),其中复发部位明确的41例患者(盆腔内、盆腔外和盆腔内外同时复发患者分别为25、13和3例)中盆腔内复发率(61.0%,25/41)显著高于盆腔外复发率(31.7%,13/41;P=0.008)。多因素分析显示,髂总淋巴结转移是影响患者预后的独立的危险因素(P=0.035)。根据这一因素,将盆腔淋巴结转移的患者分为低危组(髂总淋巴结无转移,104例)和高危组(髂总淋巴结转移,20例),其5年无瘤生存率分别为69.4%和24.5%,两组比较,差异有统计学意义(P=0.003);低危组盆腔内复发率为22.1%(23/104),高危组为25.0%(5/20),两组比较,差异无统计学意义(P〉0.05);低危组盆腔外复发率为7.7%(8/104),高危组为40.0%(8/20),两组比较,差异有统计学意义(P〈0.01)。结论伴盆腔淋巴结转移的宫颈癌患者以盆腔内复发为主,而其中髂总淋巴结转移者以盆腔外复发为主。髂总淋巴结转移是影响宫颈癌患者预后的独立的危险因素。 Objective To investigate the pattern of disease relapse and prognostic risk factor of patients with cervical carcinoma and pelvic lymph node metastasis. Methods A total of 124 cases of International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) Ⅰ b1 - Ⅱ a cervical carcinoma with pelvic node metastasis who were treated at the Cancer Center of Sun Yat-sen University during January 1994 to December 2001 were selected for this study. Prognosis and recurrence were retrospectively analyzed using the clinico-pathological data. Results The overall 5 year survival and 5 year disease-free survival were 63.3% and 61.4% , respectively. Overall recurrence rate was 39. 5% (49/124) , among which intra-pelvic relapse (61.0% ,25/41 ) was significantly more common than extra-pelvic relapse ( 31.7% , 13/41 ; P = 0. 008 ). Multivariate analysis identified involvement of common iliac node as an independent prognostic factor ( P = 0. 035). According to this factor, node-positive patients could be divided into low risk group (without common iliac node involvement, 104 cases ) and high risk group (with common iliac node involvement, 20 cases). The 5 year disease-free survival were 69. 4% and 24. 5% respectively, with a significant difference (P = 0. 003). Intra-pelvic relapse was observed in 22. 1% (23/104)of low risk and 25.0% (5/20) of high risk group respectively, with no significant difference (P 〉 0. 05 ). However extra-pelvic relapse was seen in 7. 7% ( 8/104 ) of low risk and 40. 0% ( 8/20 ) of high risk group, with a significant difference (P 〈 0. 01 ). Conclusions Common iliac node involvement is a significant factor influencing the prognosis of patients with cervical carcinoma and pelvic lymph node metastasis. Patients with positive common iliac nodes have significantly decreased 5 year disease-free survival and higher extra-pelvlc disease recurrence rates compared with those whose common iliac nodes are negative. These findings provide important data for design of individualized treatment mode.
出处 《中华妇产科杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2008年第6期425-428,共4页 Chinese Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
关键词 宫颈肿瘤 淋巴转移 肿瘤复发 局部 预后 Cervix neoplasms Lymphatic metastasis Neoplasm recurrence,local Prognosis
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1Fuller AF Jr, Elliott N, Koslotff C, et al. Determinants of increased risk for recurrence in patients undergoing radical hysterectomy for stage Ⅰ B and Ⅱ A carcinoma of the cervix. Gynecol Oncol, 1989,33:34-39.
  • 2熊樱,梁立治,刘继红,彭小萍,魏梅,沈扬,李孟达.宫颈鳞癌预后因素的层别化及其临床意义[J].中国肿瘤临床,2007,34(18):1048-1052. 被引量:11
  • 3Aoki Y, Sasaki M, Watanabe M, et aL High-risk group in nodepositive patients with stage ⅠB, ⅡA, and lib cervical carcinoma after radical hysterectomy and postoperative pelvic irradiation. Gynecol Onco1,2000,77:305-309.
  • 4Morice P, Castaigne D, Paufler P, et aL Interest of pelvic and paraaortic lymphadenectomy in patients with stage Ⅰ B and Ⅱ cervical carcinoma. Gynecol Oncol, 1999,73 : 106-110.
  • 5Landoni F, Maneo A, Connio G, et al. Class Ⅱ versus class Ⅲ radical hysterectomy in stage Ⅰ B-Ⅱ A cervical cancer: a prospective randomized study. Gynecol Oncol,2001,80:3-12.
  • 6Benedetti-Panici P, Maneschi F, D' Andrea G, et aL Early cervical carcinoma: the natural history of lymph node involvement redefined on the basis of thorough parametrectomy and giant section study. Cancer,2000,88:2267-2274.
  • 7Wright JD, Grigsby PW, Brooks R, et al. Utility of parametrectomy for early stage cervical cancer treated with radical hysterectomy. Cancer, 2007,110:1281-1286.
  • 8Puente R, Guzman S, Israel E, et aL Do the pelvic lymph nodes predict the parametrial status in cervical cancer stages IB-RA? Int J Gynecol Cancer,2004,14:832-840.
  • 9李斌,吴令英,李晓光,张询,章文华,高菊珍.早期子宫颈癌宫旁淋巴结的识别及其临床意义[J].中华妇产科杂志,2006,41(9):608-611. 被引量:30
  • 10Benedetti-Panici P, Maneschi F, Scambia G, et al. Lymphatic spread of cervical cancer: an anatomical and pathological study based on 225 radical hysterectomies with systematic pelvic and aortic lymphadenectomy. Gynecol Oncot, 1996 , 62 : 19-24.

二级参考文献36

共引文献72

同被引文献119

引证文献17

二级引证文献100

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部