期刊文献+

美、日两国巨灾损失分担机制对我国的启示--基于保险的观点 被引量:12

美、日两国巨灾损失分担机制对我国的启示——基于保险的观点
原文传递
导出
摘要 各国对巨灾损失分担机制的设计存在一定的差异,从而形成不同的结果。美、日两国在巨灾损失分担机制方面具有丰富的经验,巨灾的损失通过保险分担也得到了很好的弥补。本文重点对两国在自然灾害,尤其是在农业和地震灾害方面的保险分担经验进行分析,揭示其共性和成功经验,从而对我国的巨灾损失机制的设计以及相关政策提出建议,即建立巨灾保险管理应急机制;建立多层风险分担机制;大力培育再保市场主体;加强完善政府保险监管。 There exist significant differences in the design of the catastrophe loss sharing mechanisms in the world and thus the results may differ. The United States and Japan have accumulated rich experience in catastrophe loss sharing mechanisms. This article explores these two countries' experience in dealing with natural disasters, especially agriculture disasters and earthquake, to find out their commonness and keys to success. This article then comes up with practical suggestions for China's catastrophe loss sharing mechanisms, including establishment of emergency response mechanism, multi-tier risk sharing system, development of reinsurers, and improvement of insurance regulation.
出处 《保险研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2008年第6期19-22,共4页 Insurance Studies
关键词 巨灾损失分担 国家洪水保险计划 农业保险 地震保险 catastrophe loss sharing national flood Insurance program agriculture insurance earthquake insurance
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献23

  • 1胡炳志.论建立国内再保险市场[J].经济评论,1996(4):64-69. 被引量:2
  • 2北京大学风险管理与保险学系课题组.《中国再保险发展战略研究》(课题报告 )[R].,2002年..
  • 3Wang, S, Young, Y R & H H Panjer (1997) "Axiomatic Characterization of Insurance Prices", Insurance: Mathemstics and Economics, 21 : 173 - 183.
  • 4Borch, K H (1990) Economics of Insurance, Nolth-Holland.
  • 5Browne, M J & R E Hoyt (2000) "The Demand far Flood Insurance: Empirical Evidence", Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 20(3) : 291 - 306.
  • 6Cox, S H & H W Pedersen (2001) "Catastrophe Risk Bonds", North American Actuarial Journal. To appear.
  • 7Denuit, M, Dhaene, J & M Van Wouve, (1999) "The Economics of Insurance: A Review and Some Recent Developments", Bulletin of the Swiss Association of Actuaries, 137 - 175.
  • 8Freedom, P K (2001) "Hedging Natural Catastrophe Risk In Developing Coutries", The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance, 26 (3): 373-385.
  • 9Kunreuther, H, Novemsky, N & D Kahneman (2001) "Making Low Probability Useful", The Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 23(2) : 103 - 120.
  • 10Eeckhoudt, L & C C, Gollier (1999) "The Insurance of Lower Probability Events", Journal of Risk and Insurance, 66(1) : 17.

共引文献176

同被引文献126

引证文献12

二级引证文献16

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部