摘要
论文的写作基于这样一个"问题":在从"伤痕"到"先锋"这一脉络成为文学史"共识"的当下,"50—70年代文学"居于主体地位的"社会主义现实主义",在"新时期"有怎样的调整?既有的"一体化"的冲动是否依然存在?基于此,论文尝试从"社会主义新人"这一被"历史"所"忽视"的概念或运动入手,分析"社会主义现实主义"如何藉此重生。通过对"社会主义新人"所命名的一系列"典范文本"的细读,笔者认为这一调整的艰难以及最终的失败,既是"文学成规"之转移的必然结果,也包含着自我的瓦解——借助左翼"革命+恋爱"的模式的结果,反而是"恋爱"压倒"革命",从"新人"转变为"畸人"。然而,这一历史性的失败,某种程度上是一次"扩大化"的运动,如何更为平和地检讨"社会主义"的"文学遗产",打捞"现实主义"的文学传统与精神操守,这一问题对当下的文学现状有重要意义。
The writing of this paper is based on such an ＂issue＂ ： at the moment when the thread from ＂traumatic literature＂ to ＂vanguard literature＂ has become ＂the common understanding＂ in the history of literature, what regulations should be made ＂in the new period＂ to ＂socialist realism＂ which dominated ＂literature from the 1950s to 1970s＂？ Is there still the impulse of ＂integration＂？ In view of the abovementioned, this paper attempts to analyze the rebirth of ＂socialist realism＂ by probing into ＂socialist people of a new type＂ a concept or campaign ＂neglected＂ in ＂history＂. By perusing a series of ＂model texts＂ named after ＂socialist people of a new type＂, the author of this paper opines that the difficulty and ultimate failure of the regulations to ＂socialist realism＂ is not only the inevitable result of shift in ＂set rules of litera- ture＂ but also the outcome of self disintegration drawing support from the mode of ＂revolution plus love＂ in Left-wing literature, with the result that ＂revolution＂ is suppressed by ＂love＂ and ＂people of a new type＂ have thus become ＂ deformed ones＂. However, since the historic failure is a ＂magnified＂ campaign to some degree, how to do justice to the ＂literary heritage＂ of ＂socialism＂ and retrieve the literary tradition and spiritual integrity of ＂realism＂ is of great significance for literature at the present time.
出处
《海南师范大学学报（社会科学版）》
2008年第1期42-49,共8页
Journal of Hainan Normal University(Social Sciences)
