期刊文献+

护理操作技术难度评价指标体系的实测检验 被引量:18

Field Testing of the Efficacy of an Evaluation Index System for Assessing the Difficulty of Different Nursing Techniques
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的实测检验护理操作技术难度评价指标体系的功能与品质。方法由50位护理专家/骨干对筛选出的10项有代表性的基础护理操作技术进行难度评价,再运用加权线性和法与模糊综合评价法进行综合评价;用克朗巴赫α系数、评分者信度系数评价实测表的可信度。结果静脉输血的难度最高(难度系数为1.47),生命体征的测量难度最低(难度系数为0.98);咨询表各项目的克朗巴赫α系数在0.7739-0.8601;以"卧位患者更换床单法"为例计算得到的评分者信度系数W为0.8745(χ^2=437.2436,P〈0.05)。结论实测表具有较好的内部一致性及评分者信度,所实测检验的指标体系具有较好的评价功能。 Objective To test the efficacy and reliability of a new evaluation index system for assessing the difficulty of nursing techniques. Methods Fifty nursing experts were invited to evaluate the difficulty of 10 representative basic nursing techniques. A comprehensive evaluation of the difficulty of the techniques was performed according to the weighted sum and Fuzzy synthetic evaluation. Cronbach alpha coefficient and Kendall coefficient were adopted to assess the stability and reliability of the new index system. Results Blood transfusion was the most difficult operation tested, with a difficulty index of 1.47 ; vital sign measurement had the lowest difficulty level, with a difficulty index of 0.98. Cronbach alpha coefficients of the 10 items of the scale ranged between 0. 7739 and 0. 8601. The Kendall coefficient of changing bed sheet for the bedridden patients was 0. 8745 (X^2 = 437. 2436, P 〈0.05). Conclusion The new system has good internal stability and scorer reliability with good applicability for assessing the difficulty of the nursing techniques.
出处 《解放军护理杂志》 2008年第6期1-4,共4页 Nursing Journal of Chinese People's Liberation Army
关键词 护理操作技术 难度系数 指标体系 模糊综合评价 nursing operation technique difficulty coefficient index system Fuzzy synthetic evaluation
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

二级参考文献20

  • 1周林飞,高云彪,许士国.模糊数学在湿地水质评价中应用的研究[J].水利水电技术,2005,36(1):35-38. 被引量:30
  • 2李平,李新华,田晓丽.护理人力资源配备现状及研究进展[J].护理管理杂志,2005,5(2):24-26. 被引量:34
  • 3杨帆,余建星.水利工程移民安置工作的风险分析与评价[J].水利学报,2005,36(10):1258-1262. 被引量:13
  • 4候光明.管理激励与约束[M].北京:北京理工大学出版社,1999.27.202.
  • 5[1]Halloran, E.J.Variability in nurse staffing research. Journal of Nursing Administration, 1987,17(2):26-32
  • 6[2]Hershey, J. & Peirskalla,W. Nurse staffing management. Operational Research Applied to Health Services. New York: St. Martin' s Press.1981
  • 7[3]Unger, J. Building a classification system care that works. Journal of Nursing Administration, 1985,15(7): 18~42
  • 8[4]Leving, E. & Kahn, H.D. Operations research in Health Care: A Critical Analysis. Baltimore:Johns Hopkins University Press.1975
  • 9[6]Nagaprasanna, B. R. Patient classification systems: Strategies for the 1990s. Nursing Management, 1988,19(12):26~28
  • 10郑火林.《旅游统计学》.旅游教育出版社,1998.

共引文献329

同被引文献94

引证文献18

二级引证文献121

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部