期刊文献+

周围型肝内胆管细胞癌的CT和超声双期增强的比较研究 被引量:7

Peripheral intrahepaitc cholangiocarcinoma:comparison of two-phased contrast enhanced CT and contrast enhanced ultrasound
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的比较周围型肝内胆管细胞癌(PIHCC)的CT和超声双期增强的特点,探讨两种方法诊断PIHCC的价值。方法回顾性分析经手术及病理证实的20例PIHCC的CT和超声双期(动脉期和门静脉期)增强的资料。CT动脉期、门静脉期扫描时间分别为注入对比剂后25 s、60 s,超声造影分别为9~40 s、41~120 s。结果肿瘤最大径3.0~16.0 cm,位于肝左叶9例,肝右叶11例。CT双期全瘤低增强8例中超声造影7例(87.5%)表现为全瘤的低增强;CT双期环形增强12例中超声造影10例(83.3%)表现为周边环形增强。超声造影门静脉期瘤内低增强范围较动脉期扩大12例(60%)。PIHCC的CT双期增强方式与超声造影比较无统计学差异(x^2=1.33,P>0.05)。动脉期瘤内小血管CT显示4例(20%),超声造影显示10例(50%),两者比较有显著性差异(x^2=4.17,P<0.05)。结论PIHCC的CT和超声双期增强方式相似,两者均能为诊断PIHCC提供重要信息。超声双期增强显示瘤内小血管优于CT。 Objective To compare two-phased contrast enhanced CT (CECT) with contrast enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) for the diagnosis of peripheral intrahepaitc cholangiocarcinoma (PIHCC). Methods Twenty patients with PIHCC underwent both CECT and CEUS during arterial phase (25 s, 9-40 s, respectively) and portal venous phase (60 s, 41-120 s, respectively) after contrast medium administration. The findings from CEUS were compared with those from CECT. Results The size of the tumors ranged from 3.0 to 16.0 cm. The tumor located in the left lobe in 9 patients and in the right lobe in 11 patients. The hypodense enhancement at the whole tumor was seen in 8 patients on CECT and the hypoechoic enhancement was seen in 7 of 8 (87.5 %) patients on CEUS. The rimlike contrast enhancement at the tumor periphery was seen in 12 patients on CECT and was seen in 10 of 12 (83.3%) patients on CEUS. The hypoechoic enhancement area was enlarged during the portal venous phase compared with that during the arterial phase in 12 (60%) patients on CEUS. No statistical difference was observed in enhancement pattern of tumor between CECT and CEUS (χ^2= 1.33, P〉0.05). The intratumoral small vessels were observed in 4 (20%) patients during arterial phase on CECT and 10 (50%). patients on CEUS. The significant difference was seen in demonstrating small vessels between CECT and CEUS (χ^2=4.17 ,P〈0.05). Conclusion Both two-phased CECT and CEUS exhibit the same enhancement pattern and provide important information for the diagnosis of PIHCC. CEUS is better than CECT for demonstrating intratumoral small vessels.
出处 《中国医学影像技术》 CSCD 北大核心 2008年第1期101-103,共3页 Chinese Journal of Medical Imaging Technology
基金 广东省科技计划项目(2005B30301015)
关键词 胆管肿瘤 体层摄影术 X线计算机 超声检查 Bile duct neoplasms Tomography, X-ray computed Ultrasonography
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1Kim TK, Choi BI, Han JK, et al. Peripheral cholangioeareinoma of the liver: two phase spiral CT findings. Radiology, 1997, 204 (2) : 539-543.
  • 2Valls C. Guma A, Puig I, et al. Imrahepatic peripheral cholangiocarcinoma:CT evaluation. Abdom Imaging, 2000,25(2):490-496.
  • 3Isozaki T, Numata K, Kiba T, et al. Differential diagnosis of hepatic tumors by using contrast enhancement patterns at US, Radiology, 2003,229(3) :798-805.
  • 4Nicolau C, Vilana R. Catala V, et al, Importance of evaluating all vascular phase on contrast-enhanced sonography in the differentia tion of benign from malignant focal liver lesions. AJR, 2006, 186(1):158-167.
  • 5张民,周晓东,任小龙,王磊,韩增辉,陈敏.肝内胆管细胞癌声学造影特征初探[J].临床超声医学杂志,2006,8(4):204-206. 被引量:4
  • 6Maetani Y, Itoh K, Watanabe C, et ah MR imaging of intrahepat ic cholangioeareinoma with pathologic correlation. AJR, 2001,176 (6) :1499-1507.
  • 7李子平,郑可国,许达生.胆管细胞型肝癌的CT诊断[J].中华放射学杂志,1997,31(12):825-829. 被引量:61
  • 8赵玉珍,孟洁,张凤娟,纪晓惠,杨漪,韩若凌.肝肿瘤超声造影与增强CT的对比研究[J].中国医学影像技术,2006,22(2):183-185. 被引量:22
  • 9Wilson SR, Kim TK, Jang HJ, et al. Enhancement patterns of focal liver masses:discordance between contrast enhancement sonography and contrast enhanced CT and MRI. AJR, 2007, 189 ( 1 ) W7-W12.
  • 10徐辉雄,吕明德,谢晓燕,刘广建,徐作峰,郑艳玲,梁瑾瑜,黄蓓.超声造影对肝脏肿瘤定性诊断的研究[J].中国实用外科杂志,2004,24(11):669-671. 被引量:49

二级参考文献24

共引文献130

同被引文献69

引证文献7

二级引证文献56

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部