期刊文献+

英美法系中的心理学专家证人 被引量:2

Expert Psychological Witnesses of British and American Law System
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 专家证人指的是根据法庭的要求,依靠专业知识和技术,就法庭审案过程中所涉及的有关本专业的内容,向法庭提供的有科学依据的书面报告并直接出庭作证的各学科的专家。心理学专家证人就是心理学专家作为专家证人进行出庭作证。英美法系与我国实行的大陆法系存在着差异,该文希望通过系统地介绍英美法系心理学专家证人的发展历史及作用、心理学专家证人的工作程序、存在的争议、已有的实证研究等,为国内法律界和心理学界开辟一个新的视角,并探讨心理学专家证人在我国司法系统实施的可能性。 Expert witnesses are correlative experts who provide scientific written report and give directly testimony on the court with professional knowledge and technology at the require of court. Expert psychological witnesses are psychologists who stand on the court and give the testimony. British and American law system is very different from continental law system which is mainly used in our country. This article intents to open a new eyesight for national law area and psychology area by introducing the history, the working process, the controversy and the existed experimental researches of expert psychological witnesses of British and American law system, and also intent to explore the possibility of applying Expert psychological witness for our country law system.
出处 《心理科学进展》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2007年第6期1002-1008,共7页 Advances in Psychological Science
关键词 专家证人 英美法系 大陆法系 心理学专家证人 expert witnesses British and American law system Continental law system expert psychological Witness
  • 相关文献

参考文献29

  • 1Yarmey A D. Expert testimony: Does eyewitness memory research have probative value for the courts? Canadian Psychology, 2001, 42(2): 92-100.
  • 2Cecil J S. Ten years of judicial gatekeeping under Daubert. American Journal of Public Health, 2005, 95:74-80.
  • 3潜伟,牛强,李士琦.关于“软科学”与“硬科学”界定的思考[J].中国软科学,2003(3):147-151. 被引量:6
  • 4Haack S. Trail and error: The Supreme court's philosophy of science. American Journal of Public Health, 2005, 95:66-73.
  • 5何家弘,张卫平.外国证据法选择译.人民法院出版社,2000.
  • 6Wells G L. Expert psychological testimony: empirical and conceptual analyses of effects. Law and Human Behavior, 1986, 10:83-95.
  • 7Jepson C, Krantz D H, Nisbett R E. Inductive reasoning: Competence or skill? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 1983, 6: 494-501.
  • 8Carol K, Meghan A, Molly T Jet al. Judge and attorney experience, practices and concerns regarding expert testimony if federal civil trials. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 2002, 8(3): 309-322.
  • 9俞晓歆,耿文秀.目击证人研究[J].心理科学,2004,27(2):376-379. 被引量:6
  • 10Gratz K L, Orsillo S M. Scientific expert testimony in CSA cases: legal, ethical, and scientific considerations. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 2003, 10(3): 358-363.

二级参考文献27

  • 1王兴成.跨学科研究在中国:历程和启示[J].科学学研究,1995,13(2):1-6. 被引量:6
  • 2马宾.关于软科学[J].中国软科学,1995(7):23-29. 被引量:3
  • 3张承友.软科学及其价值[J].科学学研究,1996,14(4):13-19. 被引量:1
  • 4李仕明.软科学 质疑 [J].科学学与科学技术管理,1995,16(10):4-5.
  • 5Kebbell, Mark R, Milne, Rebecca. Police officers' perceptions of eyewitness performance in forensic investigations. Journal of Social Psychology, 1998,138(3).
  • 6Siegfried Ludwig Sporer. Eyewimess identification accuracy, confidence, and decision times in simultaneous and sequential lineups. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1993,178 (1):22- 33.
  • 7Lindsay et al. Sequential lineup presentation: technique matters.Journal of Applied Psychology, 1991,176(5) :741 - 745.
  • 8Cawley, Janet, Catching criminals with a No2 pencil: how Jeanne Boylan brings the faces of evil to life, Biography, 2001,5(7).
  • 9Hansen, Mark. Expertise on trial. ABA Journal, 2002,88 (12).
  • 10Sex differences, weapon focus, and eyewitness reliability. Journal of Social Psychology, 1994, 134(4) :413.

共引文献17

同被引文献29

引证文献2

二级引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部