期刊文献+

湘西更新世哺乳动物化石痕迹考察研究 被引量:1

Investigation on Split Trace of Mammal Bone Fossils of Pleistocene Epoch from Western Hunan
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的考察湘西土家族苗族自治州古丈县断龙乡猛虎洞更新世哺乳动物群骨化石断裂痕迹的状态与原因,探索湘西地区古人类活动的遗迹.方法观测哺乳动物群骨化石断裂痕迹剖面的形态结构,以区别食肉类动物群的咬痕与人类打造的印迹.结果经40件东方剑齿象、中国犀、鹿等残骨化石标本断裂痕迹剖面的观测,发现有部分骨化石断裂剖面圆钝,似啮齿动物的咬痕,但大部分骨化石断端剖面呈锥形切削改造,有的双面削刮呈锐利器型,有的存在明显打击或铲刮的“印记”,初步认为属早期人类制作骨器的遗迹.结论结合地理环境和地学结构分析,猛虎洞可能属晚更新世(10-5)万年前旧石器人类穴居的营地或系同生代古脊椎动物的遗址. Objective: Investigating the profile and its forming mechanism for split trace of mammalian bone fossils of Pleistocene Epoch in Menghu cavity at Duanlong village, Guzhang county, western area of Hunan Province, and exploring the remains of Palaeohuman activitiy in this region. Methods: The profiles of split trace of mammal fauna bone fossils were identified, which gave assistance to distinguish manufacture imprints of Palaeohmnan from bite marks of car- nivorous fauna. Results: The profiles of split trace of 40 bone fossil samples respectively from Stegodon orientalis, Chinese rhinoceros, Cervus and other mammalian fauna were identified, some of them were found blunt and might be rodent bite marks. But most split trace of samples with tapered profile had been cutted, of which some presented sharp implement with double side shaved,and some even obviously possessed bitted or scrapped "imprint". It was confirmed that they were possibly the vestiges of Palaeohuman activation making bone tools. Conclusions: The analysis of geographical environment and geology structure of west region of Hunan Province revealed that Menghu cavity was possibly one of troglodytism sites for Paleolithic human or of activated places for paleovertebrates in Late Pleistocene Epoch around 100 000 - 50 000 years ago.
出处 《吉首大学学报(自然科学版)》 CAS 2007年第4期122-125,共4页 Journal of Jishou University(Natural Sciences Edition)
基金 湖南省教育厅科学研究项目([2004]045)
关键词 湘西 更新世 哺乳动物 化石裂痕 考古学 western Hunan Pleistocene Epoch mammal split trace of fossils archaeology
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献52

  • 1Gifford DP.Taphonomy and paleoeeology:A critical review of archaeology's sister disciplines[A].In:schifer MB ed.Advances in Archaeological Method and Theory[C].Vol.4.New York and London:Academic Press,1981,365-438.
  • 2Lyman RL.Vertebrate Taphonomy[M].London:Cambridge University Press,1994.
  • 3Blumenschine RJ.Carcass consumption sequences and the archaeological distinction of scavenging and hunting[J].Journal of Human Evolution,1986,15:639-659.
  • 4Marean CW,Spencer LM,Blumenschine PJ,Capaldo SD.Captive hyaena bone choice and destruction,the Schlepp Effect and Olduvai archaeofaunas[J].Journal of Archaeological Science,1992,19:101-121.
  • 5Rogers AR.On equifinality in faunal analysis[J].American Antiquity,2000,65:709-723.
  • 6Shipman P.Life History of a Fossil[M].Cambridge:Harvard University Press,1981.
  • 7Klein RG,Cruz-Uribe K.Exploitation of large bovids and seals at Middle and Later Stone Age sites in South Africa[J].Journal of Human Evolution,1996,31:315-334.
  • 8Morrison D,Whitridge P.Estimating the age and sex of caribou from mandibular measurements[J].Journal of Archaeological Science,1997,24:1093-1106.
  • 9Speth JD.Bison Kills and Bone Counts[M].Chicago:University of Chicago Press,1983.
  • 10Stiner MC.Honor Among Thieves[M].Princeton:Princeton University Press.1994.

共引文献19

同被引文献29

引证文献1

二级引证文献18

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部