摘要
本文首先充分肯定了聂珍钊教授提出的文学伦理学批评,然后就该批评的方法论基础是一元的,还是多元的,是排他性的,还是包容性的,提出了自己的思考。本文主要从道德价值的多元阐释、历史阐释的双向性以及批评的对话意识等方面,就文学伦理学批评的方法论基础,进行了多元主义的阐释,指出,以价值判断为基础的道德标准是多元的,文学作品的伦理道德评判存在着正、反两个方向的阐释,任何结论性的文学伦理道德判断都是可以被批判和重新思考的。因此,文学伦理学批评应该是一种敞开式的对话批评。它不是在对读者进行道德说教,而是不断提出问题,引发读者思考,与读者对话。
This paper first of all makes a favorable comment on the contribution made by the ethical literary criticism advanced by Professor Nie Zhenzhao, and then puts forward some ideas and thoughts on whether the basis of the critical approach is monistic or pluralistic, exclusive or compatible. Based on the pluralistic interpretations of moral values, the two - way characteristics of historical interpretation, and the dialogical consciousness in criticism, the paper mainly elaborates on the methodology basis of literary ethical criticism from the perspective of pluralism. It demonstrates that moral standards based on the value judgment are pluralistic, that the judgment of ethi- cal morals in literature can be progressive and retrogressive and that any concluding remarks concerning literary ethics can be criticized and reconsidered. Therefore, ethical literary criticism ought to be open and dialogical. It is not to preach morally at the readers, but rather to pose questions, provoke thinking and have dialogues with the readers.
出处
《外国文学研究》
CSSCI
北大核心
2007年第5期137-143,共7页
Foreign Literature Studies
