期刊文献+

肛瘘的高分辨MRI表现 被引量:29

High-resolution MRI for primary anal fistulas
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨体外相位阵列线圈高分辨 MRI 对肛瘘检查的准确性及其价值。方法经手术证实的肛瘘患者20例,全部行体外相位阵列线圈高分辨 MRI 检查,检查序列主要包括高分辨轴面、矢状面和冠状面 T_2WI 和轴面抑脂 T_2WI 序列。结果 20例肛瘘共27个原发瘘管、24个内口,28个外口,10个肛周脓肿。高分辨 MRI 对原发瘘管、肛周脓肿、内口显示的敏感度分别为92.6%(25/27)、100.0%(10/10)和91.7%(22/24),特异度分别为92.3%(12/13)、96.3%(26/27)和85.7%(12/14)。结论体外相位阵列线圈高分辨 MRI 可较准确地判断肛瘘的分型、瘘管走行及有无脓肿形成,对正确的手术治疗非常必要。 Objective To evaluate the accuracy and clinical value of preoperative high-resolution magnetic resonance (MR) imaging with a phased-array coil for the detection of anal fistulas. Methods A total of 20 patients with surgically proved anal fistulas underwent preoperative MR imaging with phased-array coil at 1.5 T MR unit. The imaging protocol included high-resolution T2-weighted turbo spin echo sequence acquisition at axial, sagittal and coronal planes and axial T2 -weighted sequence with fat suppression. Results Twenty patients were found to have 27 fistulas, 24 internal openings,28 external openings, and 10 perianal abcesses. The sensitivity and specificity for detecting primary fistula tracks, abscesses and internal openings were92.6% (25/27) and 92.3% (12/13), 100.0% (10/10) and 96.3% (26/27), 91.7% (22/24) and 85.7% (12/14), respectively. Conclusion High-resolution MR imaging is a very accurate preoperative technique for evaluating the classification of fistula-in-ano, the course of primary tracks and the presence of abscesses, thus providing important information for proper surgical treatment.
出处 《中华放射学杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2007年第7期712-715,共4页 Chinese Journal of Radiology
关键词 磁共振成像 肛管 瘘管 Magnetic resonance imaging Anal canal Fistula
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1Beets-Tan RG, Beets GL, van der Hoop AG, et al. Preoperative MR imaging of anal fistulas: does it really help the surgeon? Radiology, 2001, 218: 75-84.
  • 2Parks AG, Gordon PH, Hardcastle JD. A classification of fistulain-ano. Br J Surg, 1976, 63 : 1-12.
  • 3Barker PG, Lunniss PJ, Armstrong P, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging of fistula-in-ano : technique, interpretation and accuracy. Clin Radiol, 1994, 49: 7-13.
  • 4Buchanan GN, Halligan S, Bartram CL, et al. Clinical examination, endosonography, and MR imaging in preoperative assessment of fistula in ano: comparision with outcome-based reference standard. Radiology, 2004, 233: 674-681.
  • 5Buchanan GN, Halligan S, Williams AB, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging for primary fistula in ano. Br J Surg, 2003, 90: 877-881.
  • 6Schaefer O, Lohrmann C, Langer M. Assessment of anal fistulas with high-resolution subtraction MR fistulography: comparison with surgical findings. J Magn Reson Imaging, 2004, 19: 91-98.
  • 7Choen S, Burnett S, Bartram CI, et al. Comparison between anal endosonography and digital examination in the evaluation of anal fistulae. Br J Surg, 1991,78: 445-447.
  • 8Maier AG, Funovics MA, Kreuzer SH, et al. Evaluation of perianal sepsis comparison of anal endosonography and magnetic resonance imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging, 2001, 14: 254-260.
  • 9Scholefield JH, Berry DP, Armitage NC, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging in the management of fistula in ano. Int J Colorectal Dis, 1997, 12: 276-279.
  • 10deSouza NM, Hall AS, Puni R, et al. High resolution magnetic resonance imaging of the anal sphincter using a dedicated endoanal coil, comparison of magnetic resonance imaging with surgical findings. Dis Colon Rectum, 1996, 39: 926-934.

同被引文献197

引证文献29

二级引证文献236

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部