期刊文献+

艺术的终结与重生 被引量:30

The Death and Rebirth of Art
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 本文着重探讨了黑格尔和丹托的“艺术终结”理论,指出“艺术终结”的根源是18世纪以来确立的“审美自律”。“为艺术而艺术”导致艺术只与自身相关,艺术的创新就意味着对以往艺术的颠覆,现代艺术正是在这种创新的压力下穷尽了所有的可能性而走向终结。要摆脱艺术终结的命运,首先要将艺术从自律中解放出来,重新恢复它的各种社会功能,尤其是其对现代文明的批判功能。中国当代艺术表明,多元的艺术观念、混杂的社会形态和独特的艺术传统,是艺术在现代文明中获得新生的重要因素。 This paper mainly discusses the theories of 'the end of art' by Hegel and Danto pointing out that the aesthetic self-discipline established since 18th century is the origin of these theories.The idea of 'art for art's sake' leads to an art that only concerns about itself,and any originality,either in form or content,would mean destruction of the past.It is under this pressure of originality that modern art exhausts all its possibilities and comes to an end.In order to get rid of the pressure,art must free from its own discipline and restore its social function,especially its critiques of modern civilization.The contemporary Chinese art shows that the multiple conceptions of art,the hybridized form of society,and the unique tradition of art are the important factors that give rise to the rebirth of art in modern culture.
作者 彭锋
出处 《文艺研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2007年第7期30-38,共9页 Literature & Art Studies
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

  • 1黑格尔 朱光潜译.《美学》第一卷[M].商务印书馆,1979年版.第24、24页.
  • 2Stephen Davies,"End of Art",in David Cooper (ed.).,A Companion to Aesthetics,Malden:Blackwell Publishing Ltd.,1992,pp.138-142.
  • 3Cf.Gregg Horowitz,"Aesthetics of the Avant-Garde",in Jerrold Levinson (ed.),The Oxford Handbook of Aesthetics,Oxford:Oxford University Press,2003,p.751.
  • 4A.Danto,The Transfiguration of the Commonplace:A Philosophy of Art,Cambridge:Harvard University Press,1981,p.40.
  • 5Cf.David Novitz,"Arthur Danto",in A Companion to Aesthetics,p.105.
  • 6利奥塔.《后现代性与公正游戏》,谈瀛洲译,上海人民出版社,1997年版,第138页.
  • 7贡布里希.《艺术与错觉--图画再现的心理学研究》,林夕等译,湖南科学技术出版社,2004年版,第107-130页.
  • 8Jacques Taminiaux,Poetics,Speculation,and Judgment:The Shadow of the Work of Art from Kant to Phenomenology,trans.Michael Gendre,Albany:State University of New York Press,1993,pp.55-72.
  • 9Jacques Taminiaux,Poetics,Speculation,and Judgment:The Shadow of the Work of Art from Kant to Phenomenology,Albany:SUNY Press,1993,p.62.
  • 10Paul O.Kristeller,“The Modern System of the Arts:A Study in the History of Aesthetics”,in Peter Kivy (ed.),Eassys on the History of Aesthetics,Rochester:University of Rochester Press,1992,pp.3-64.

二级参考文献22

  • 1彼得·比格尔.《先锋派理论》[M].商务印书馆,2002年版.第119-120页.
  • 2Peter Barger, Thoerie der Avantgarde (Suhrkamp, Verlag, 1980).
  • 3Tamas Hofer, "Construction of the 'Folk Cultural Heritage in Hungary' and Rival Version of National Idendty", in Tanas Hofer(ed. ),Hungarians between ' East' and 'West. ' Three Essays on National Mycths and Symbols (Budapest; Museum of Ethnography 1994), p.48. The possages quoted by Hofer are by Georg L, Mosse.
  • 4Luis Camnitzer, New Art of Cuba (Austin: University of Texas Press 1994), p. xxii.
  • 5Patrick D. Flores, "Razstavitev Evrope v jugovzhodni Aziji, konteksti nove sodobnosti"(Undoing Europe in Southeast Asia, Contexts of a New Contemporary), Ftlozofski vestnik, voL XXIV, no. 3 (Ljubljana 2003), p. 95. The quotation at the end of the passage is from Nicholas Dirks, "Introduction, Colonialism and Culture", Colonialism and Culture (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press 1992), p. 3.
  • 6Karen Armstrong, Islara. A Short History (London, Phoenix Press 2001), p. 124.
  • 7Arthur C. Danto, The Philosophical Disenfranchisment of Art (New York; Columbia University Press 1986), p. 81.
  • 8Gerard Genette, L ' ouvre de l'art. La relation esthetique (Paris: Seuil 1997), p.11.
  • 9Ernst Gombrich, The Image and the Eye (Oxford, Phaidon 1982),p. 12.
  • 10St. John of Damascus, On the Divine Images. Three Apologies Against Those Who Attack the Divine Images (Crestwood N. Y. ; St.Vladimir's Seminary Press 2000), p. 19.

共引文献37

同被引文献178

引证文献30

二级引证文献61

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部