期刊文献+

新鲜与防腐标本椎体骨密度及最大抗压力的相关研究 被引量:2

Correlation between the maximal axial compression force and bone density of fresh and embalmed vertebral bone
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的通过新鲜与防腐标本椎体最大抗压力的测定,探讨福尔马林浸泡对骨质和最大抗压力强度的影响。方法选用同一地区、同一种族、同一性别、同一年龄段新鲜标本6具,福尔马林浸泡1、2、3、5、8年防腐标本,每组各6具,摄X光片除外骨折、肿瘤、结核及先天畸形,取出T10~L5标本,并游离成单个完整椎体,逐一测量骨密度(BMD)后,进行生物力学试验。单个椎体从椎弓根处切除上、下关节突,将整个椎件置于两钢板间,以5mm/min的加载速率进行垂直加载,直到标本屈服为止,测出最大抗压力。试验机的载荷信号由计算机数据采集系统记录,并由相应的测试分析软件测出椎体的最大抗压力,进行方差分析和多重比较。结果最大抗压力与福尔马林浸泡时间呈负相关。结论福尔马林浸泡时间越长,骨质越疏松,最大抗压力强度下降。 Objective To investigate the maximal axial compression force difference between the fresh and embalmed vertebral body and to study thd effect of formalin on bone density and the maximal compression force. Methods Six fresh specimens were harvested for this study. All of them were of the same region, race and sex. Thirty embalmed specimen were harvested for this study. They were divided into five groups ( n = 6 ). They had been kept in the formalin for 1 year,2 years,3 years,5 years and 8 years separately. All of the specimen should be X-rayed to exclude fracture, tuberculosis, rheumatism, tumor and hereditary malformation. Then T10-L5 vertebral bodies were taken out. BMD was measured. Then the biomechanical test was performed. Processus articulares superior and processus articulares inferiores were cut away from the vertebral pedicle. The vertebral body was put between two mental plates. The axial compressive load was applied at the speed of 5mm/min until the vertebral body failed. All of the datum were analyzed by software-SPSS 10.0. The analysis method was variance analysis and multiple comparation. Results The maximal axial compression force and embalmed time-length was negatively correlated. Conclusion The longer the embalmed time, the more obvious osteoporosis. The maximal compressive strength will decrease accordingly.
出处 《中国综合临床》 北大核心 2007年第6期534-536,共3页 Clinical Medicine of China
基金 河北省卫生厅资助(04078)
关键词 骨密度 椎体 福尔马林 最大抗压力 Bone density Vertebral body Formalin Maximal compression force
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

  • 1戴克戎.脊柱和脊髓的生物力学[J].中华外科杂志,1987,25(1):56-59.
  • 2黎小坚,Harold M Frost,朱绍舜,柯华珠.基础骨生物学新观[J].中国骨质疏松杂志,2001,7(2):152-174. 被引量:73
  • 3Webster. SS. Jee. Skeletal Adaptation to mechanical usage, the mechanostat and the uah paradigm for bone physiology:a better understandering of modern one physiology[ C]. 2001国际骨质疏松高级研讨会会刊,2001:27-42.
  • 4罗先正.骨折与骨质疏松[C].2001骨质疏松高级研讨会会刊,2001:100—102.

二级参考文献54

  • 1[20]Teitelbaum SL.Bone resorption by osteoclasts.Science,2000,289:1504-1508.
  • 2[21]Puzas EJ,Lewis GD.Biology of osteoclasts and osteoblasts.In:Orthopaedics.Principles of basic and clinical science,Chapter 3.Bronner F and Worrell RV,Eds,Boca Raton:CRC Press,1999.
  • 3[22]Miller SC,Bowman BM,Smith JM et al.Characterization of endosteal bone-lining cells from fatty marrow bone sites in adult beagles.Anat Rec,1980,198:163.
  • 4[23]Miller SC,Jee WSSS.The bone lining cell:a distinct phenotype?.Calcif Tissue Int,1992,41:1.
  • 5[24]Frost HM.Bone modeling and skeletal modeling errors.Springfield:CC Thomas,1973.
  • 6[25]Frost HM.Osteoporoses;new concepts and some implications for future diagnosis,treatment and research(based on insights from the Utah paradigm),Berlin:Ernst Schering Research Foundation AG,1998:7.
  • 7[26]Farost HM.Bone development during childhood,a tutorial(some insights of a new paradigm).In:Paediatric osteology,Schnau E, Ed,Amsterdam:Elsevier,1996:3.
  • 8[27]Frost HM,A determinant of bone architecture:the minimum effective strain.Clin Orthop Rel Res,1983,175:286.
  • 9[28]Mundy FR.Bone remodeling.In:Primer on the metabolic bone diseases and disorders of mineral metabolism,Fourth edition,Favus MJ, Ed,Lippincott,Williams and Wilkins,1999,Chapter 4.
  • 10[29]Cowin SC,Mechanical modeling of the stress adaptation process in bone.Calcif Tissue Int 1984,36:598.

共引文献75

同被引文献37

引证文献2

二级引证文献97

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部