期刊文献+

半干旱区不同垄沟集雨种植马铃薯模式对土壤蒸发的影响 被引量:46

Effects of different ridge-furrow planting patterns of potato on soil evaporation in semiarid area
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 通过垄沟集雨种植马铃薯试验,研究了不同垄沟集雨种植模式对土壤蒸发的影响.结果表明,在马铃薯全生育期,垄上覆盖塑料薄膜(CR)处理土壤蒸发量为122.9~165mm,垄上原土夯实不覆膜(UR)处理土壤蒸发量为90.9~101.2mm,无垄带状种植(CK)土壤蒸发量为80.7mm.其中,覆膜垄处理CR60在马铃薯成熟期土壤蒸发强度最大,达2.6mm·d^-1,平均为1.46mm·d^-1,而对照的土壤蒸发强度为0.65mm.d-1;不覆膜土垄处理(UR30)土壤蒸发强度苗期最小,只有0.2mm·d^-1,平均为0.39mm·d^-1,而对照的土壤蒸发强度为0.58mm·d^-1.在马铃薯生长的现蕾期和开花期,水面蒸发量最大,日平均水面蒸发量分别为8.3和9.0mm,与土壤蒸发不同步.马铃薯成熟期,各处理棵间土壤蒸发量都达到最大值.覆膜垄蒸发量最大,集雨效果显著,所以应采取抑制土壤蒸发措施,以便进一步提高水分利用效率. This paper studied the soil evaporation in potato field in semi-arid area under effects of covering ridge with plastic film ( CR), uncovering ridge but compacted ( UR), and belt planting on fiat soil without ridge (CK). The results showed that in the whole growth season of potato, soil evaporation was 122.9-165 mm, 90.9-101.2 mm, and 80.7 mm under CR, UR, and CK, respectively. Treatment CR60 had the maximum soil evaporation (2.6 mm · d^- 1 ) at maturing stage, with a mean of 1.46 mm · d^-1 , while the soil evaporation in CK was 0. 65 mm · d^-1. In treatment UR30, soil evaporation was the minimum (0.2 mm · d^ - 1 ) at seedling stage, with a mean of 0. 39 mm · d^ -1, while CK was 0.58 mm · d^-1. However, water surface evaporation was the maximum at budding and flowering stages, with the daily average evaporation being 8.3 mm and 9.0 mm, respectively, and not in-phase with soil evaporation. At maturing stage, soil evaporation was the maximum in all treatments. It was suggested that covered ridge had high efficiency of rainfall harvesting, but owing to its maximum soil evaporation, measures should be taken to inhibit soil evaporation to increase water use efficiency.
出处 《应用生态学报》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2007年第4期795-800,共6页 Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology
基金 国家重点基础研究发展规划资助项目(2002CB111502)
关键词 半干旱区 垄沟种植 集雨 土壤蒸发 马铃薯 semiarid area ridge-furrow planting rainwater harvesting soil evaporation potato
  • 相关文献

参考文献21

  • 1Boast CW,Robertson TM.1982.A micro-lysimeter method for determining evaporation from bare soil:Description and laboratory evaluation.Soil Science Society of America Journal,46:689-696
  • 2Boers TM,Pondervan K,Ben-Asher J.1986.Micro-catchment water harvesting (MCWH) for arid zone development.Agricultural Water Management,12:21-39
  • 3Brisson N,Perrier A.1991.A semi-empirical model of bare soil evaporation for crop simulation models.Water Resources Research,27:719-727
  • 4陈仲全.旱作农田沟种植垅覆盖集水试验[J].水科学进展,1995,6(3):243-247. 被引量:4
  • 5Cook S,Li FR,Wei HL.2000.Rainwater harvesting agriculture in Gansu Province,People's Republic of China.Journal of Soil and Water Conservation,55:112-114
  • 6丁圣彦,梁国付,曹新向.集水农业技术地区适宜性评价[J].资源科学,2003,25(2):51-55. 被引量:13
  • 7韩思明.黄土高原旱作农田降水资源高效利用的技术途径[J].干旱地区农业研究,2002,20(1):1-9. 被引量:57
  • 8黄占斌.旱区集雨农业与新技术革命[J].农业现代化研究,1998,19(6):384-387. 被引量:7
  • 9Kang S-Z (康绍忠),Cai H-J (蔡焕杰),Ma X-Y (马孝义).2002.The present situation and future research orientation of agricultural soil and water engineering science in dry area// Agricultural Soil and Water Engineering Committee of Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering:High Efficient Agricultural Water Use and Soil and Water Environmental Protection.Xi'an:Shaanxi Science and Technology Press:19-23 (in Chinese).
  • 10Lascano RJ,van Bavel CHM.1986.Simulation and measurement of evaporation from a bare soil.Soil Science Society of America Journal,50:1127-1133

二级参考文献160

共引文献472

同被引文献727

引证文献46

二级引证文献744

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部