期刊文献+

细胞DNA倍体分析评估宫颈上皮内瘤变 被引量:19

Assessment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia(CIN)lesions by DNA image cytometry
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的评价通过细胞DNA倍体分析诊断宫颈上皮内瘤变(CIN)的效果。方法对87例宫颈癌普查妇女用宫颈刷取材、液基薄层制片,由细胞学医师对巴氏染色片做常规细胞诊断,应用全自动DNA倍体分析仪对DNA染色片进行自动扫描诊断。对活检样本做出病理诊断,并应用免疫组化ABC法测定宫颈鳞状上皮细胞核内Ki67蛋白的表达。结果87例受检者中,常规细胞学诊断为正常30例,非典型鳞状细胞(ASCUS)20例,低度鳞状上皮内病变(LSIL)30例,高度鳞状上皮内病变(HSIL)7例;无异倍体细胞者26例,有异倍体细胞者61例,其中Ⅰ级17例,Ⅱ级21例,Ⅲ级23例。20例ASCUS者中,有7例无异倍体细胞,未发现一例CIN_2以上级别的病理改变,Ki67阳性细胞分布在鳞状上皮下方37.1%范围内;13例有异倍体细胞者中,11例有CIN_2以上病理改变,Ki67免疫阳性细胞分布于上皮层下46.2%范围内。30例LSIL者中,有7例未发现异倍体细胞,其中3例有CIN_2以上病理改变,Ki67阳性细胞只分布在鳞状上皮下方37.1%范围内;23例伴有DNA异倍体细胞者中,22例发现CIN_2以上病理改变,Ki67阳性细胞增至鳞状上皮层中上方62.6%范围内,与7例未发现异倍体细胞者差异有统计学意义(P<0.01)。7例HSIL病例中均有DNA异倍体细胞出现。以≥3个DNA异倍体细胞作为评估CIN_2及以上病理改变的标准,其敏感性为72.7%,特异性为87.5%,阳性预测值为90.9%,阴性预测值为65.1%,均比以常规细胞学诊断为LSIL及以上级别作为评估CIN_2及以上病理改变的标准(分别为58.2%、84.4%、86.5%和54.0%)要高。结论DNA倍体分析可诊断宫颈CIN病变,并预测其发展。 Objective To compare the value of conventional cytology and DNA image cytometry (DNA-ICM) assisted cytology in detection and prognostic assessment of cervical CIN lesions. Methods 87 women were enrolled in this study. Cervical samples were collected employing cervix brushes which were then washed in Sedfix. After preparing single cell suspensions by mechanical procedure, cell monolayers were prepared by eyto-spinning the cells onto microscope slides. Two slides were prepared from each case: one slide was stained by Papanieolou staining for conventional cytology, another was st,ained by FeulgenThionin method for measurements of the amount of DNA in the cell nuclei using an automated DNA imaging eytometer. Biopsies from the cervical lesions were also taken for histopathology and Ki-67 immunohistoehemistry. Results Of the total of 20 ASCUS cases called by conventional cytology, no CIN2 nor greater lesions were found. Among the 20 cases, 7 cases did not show any cells with DNA amount greater than 5e, while CIN2 lesions were found in 11 of other 13 cases that had some aneuploid cells with DNA amount greater than 5e. Of 30 LSIL cases called by conventional cytology, CIN2 lesions were detected in 3 out of 7 eases that did not contain any aneuploid cells with DNA greater than 5e, but in 22 out of the other 23 eases that contained aneuploid cells with DNA amount greater than 〉 5e. Of the remaining 7 cases called HSIL by conventional cytology, all case contained aneuploid cells containing DNA greater than 5e. If cytology was used to refer all cases of LSIL and HSIL to eolposeopy procedure to detect potential CIN2 or greater lesions, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value were 58.2% , 84.4% , 86.5% and 54.0% , respectively. If DNA-ICM were used and all cases having 3 or more cells with a DNA amount greater than 5e were assessed to be referred to pathology to detect potential CIN2 or greater lesions, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive were 72.7%, 87.5%, 90.9% and 65. 1%, respectively. We also compared Ki67 positive cells in these samples and found that DNA-ICM results were comparable to this biomarker method. Conclusion The study demonstrated that DNA-ICM approach can be successfully used to detect significant ( i. e. CIN2 or greater) lesions, and also provide a prognostic assessment of CIN lesions.
出处 《中华肿瘤杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2006年第11期831-835,共5页 Chinese Journal of Oncology
关键词 宫颈上皮内瘤变 DNA倍体分析 KI67 Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia DNA image cytometry Ki-67
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1Ostor AG. Natural history of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: a critical review. Int J Gynecol Pathol, 1993, 12: 186-192.
  • 2Heatley MK. How should we grade CIN? Histopathology, 2002, 40:377-390.
  • 3Kashyap V, Das DK, Luthra UK. Microphotometric nuclear DNA analysis in cervical dysplasia of the uterine cervix : its relation to the progression to malignancy and regression to normalcy. Neoplasma,1990, 37: 487-500.
  • 4孙小蓉,汪键,Alfred Boecking.DNA倍体分析系统用于宫颈癌及上皮内瘤变的诊断及预测[J].中华病理学杂志,2005,34(7):435-437. 被引量:60
  • 5Sun XR, Wang J, Garner D, et al. Detection of cervical cancer and high grade neoplastic lesions by a combination of liquid-based sampling preparation and DNA measurements using automated image cytometry. Cell Oncol, 2005, 27: 33-41.
  • 6Palcic B, Garner DM, MacAulay CE, at al. Oncometrics Imaging Corporation and Xillix Technologies Corporation. Use of the Cyto-Savant in quantitative cytology. Acta Cytol, 1996, 40: 67-72.
  • 7Boking A, Giroud F, Reith A. Consensus report of the ESACP task force on standardization of diagnostic DNA image cytometry.European Society for Analytical Cellular Pathology. Anal Cell Pathol,1995, 8: 67-74.
  • 8Auer GU, Caspersson TO, Wallgren AS. DNA content and survival in mammary carcinoma. Anal Quant Cytol, 1980, 2: 161-165.
  • 9Boking A, Nguyen VQ. Diagnostic and prognostic use of DNA image cytometry in cervical squamous intraepithelial lesions and invasive carcinoma. Cancer, 2004, 102:41-54.
  • 10Grote HJ, Nguyen HV, Leick AG, et al. Identification of progressive cervical epithelial cell abnormalities using DNA image cytometry.Cancer, 2004, 102: 373-379.

二级参考文献56

  • 1孙小蓉,李玉兰,车东媛,晏想成,凌慧芳,凃洪章,汪键.用细胞DNA定量分析方法进行宫颈癌普查的临床研究[J].诊断病理学杂志,2005,12(1):12-16. 被引量:67
  • 2Remmerbach TW, Weidenbach H, Pomjanski N, et al. Cytologic and DNA-cytometric early diagnosis of oral cancer[J]. Anal Cell Pathol,2001,22(4) :211 - 221.
  • 3Azua J, Romeo P, Morales M, et al. DNA quantification as a prognostic factor in gastric adenocarcinoma [ J ]. Anal Quant Cytol Histol,1998,20(3) :211 - 224.
  • 4Dey P, Luthra UK, Prasad A, et al. Cytologic grading and DNA image cytometry of breast carcinoma on fine needle aspiration cytology smears. Anal Quant Cytol Histol, 1999,21(1): 17 - 20.
  • 5Murty VV, Mitra AB, Das BC, et al. Chromosomal Phenotypes in patients with precancerous lesions of the uterine cervix progressed to cancer during follow up[J]. Oncology, 1988,45(5) :384 - 388.
  • 6Norming U, Tribukait B, Gustafson H, et al. Deoxyribonucleic acid profile and tumor progression in primary carcinoma in situ of the bladder: a study of 63 patients with grade 63 lesions [ J ]. J Urol, 1992,147(1) :11- 15.
  • 7Rahmy M, Skacel M, Brainard J, et al. chromosomal alterations in lowand high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions( LSIL and HSIL)of the uterine cervix detected by multicolor fluorescence in situ hybridization(FISH) [J] .Acta Cytol,2002,46:928.
  • 8Bollmann R, Mehes G,Torka R, et al. Determination of features indicating progression in atypical squamous cells with undetermined significance[ J ]. Cancer, 2003,99 (2): 113 - 117.
  • 9Bocking A,Nguyen VQ.Diagnostic and prognostic use of DNA image cytometry in cervical squamous intraepithelial lesions and invasive carcinoma[ J]. Cancer, 2004,102(1) :41 - 54.
  • 10Liu S, Semenciw R, Probert A, et al. Cervical cancer in Canada:changing patterns in incidence and mortality[J]. Int J Gynecol Cancer,2001,11(1) :24 - 31.

共引文献119

同被引文献222

引证文献19

二级引证文献85

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部