期刊文献+

胸腰椎爆裂性骨折伤椎固定的生物力学研究 被引量:44

Biomechanical comparison of two types of posterior pedicle instrumentation
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的比较跨节段椎弓根钉固定与三椎体六枚椎弓根钉固定术固定胸腰椎骨折的生物力学效果。方法采用8具新鲜小牛椎体标本(T_(11)~L_3),MTS机压缩制作L_1椎体爆裂性骨折模型。实验分完整状态组、骨折组、跨节段椎弓根钉固定组、三椎体六枚椎弓根钉固定组。应用脊柱三维运动试验机对标本进行前屈,后伸,左、右侧弯及左、右旋转6个方位的运动范围(ROM)测试并计算刚度值,所得数据进行统计学处理,比较各组间差异。结果脊柱骨折状态6个方向ROM均显著增加(P<0.05),椎间刚度值明显降低(P<0.05);固定状态的ROM均较完整状态、骨折状态显著减小(P<0.01),而刚度值均较完整状态、骨折状态增大,差异有显著性意义(P<0.05);跨节段椎弓根钉固定组与三椎体六枚椎弓根钉固定组之间的ROM、刚度值差异均无显著性意义(P>0.05)。结论跨节段椎弓根固定与三椎体六枚椎弓根钉固定术在重建脊柱骨折稳定性方面,效果无明显差异。 Objective To compare the biomechanical properties between the two-level fixation by implantation of pedicle-screws into the adjacent upper and lower vertebrae of the fractured vertebra and the three-level fixation by implantation of pedicle screws into the fractured vertebra and its adjacent upper and lower vertebrae in the treatment of thoracolumbar burst fractures. Methods Eight fresh frozen calf spines were used in this study. Each specimen was tested in four models: intact model as the control, L1 burst fracture model, two-level fixation model, and three-level fixation model. The L1 burst fracture model was created on a biaxial material testing machine (MTS858 Bionix test system, America). During the experiment, the flexion, extension, bilateral bending and axial rotation loadings were applied to the specimens and the range of motion (ROM) was measured with a three-dimensional laser analysis apparatus and the stiffness was calculated subsequently. One-way statistical analysis was used. Results The ROMs under six different loadings in the fracture model became larger obviously ( P 〈 0. 05) and the stiffness decreased ( P 〈 0. 05) . The ROMs in both fixation models were smaller than those in the other models ( P 〈 0. 01 ) and the stiffness increased distinctly ( P 〈 0. 05). There were no significant differences in ROMs and stiffness between the two-level fixation and three-level fixation models ( P 〉 0. 05) . Conclusion Two-level fixation provides similar biomechanical stability as three-level fixation does in the reconstruction of unstable thoracolumbar fractures.
出处 《中华创伤骨科杂志》 CAS CSCD 2006年第9期857-860,共4页 Chinese Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma
基金 广州市科委攻关项目(2005Z3-E0401 2005Z2-E0111)
关键词 脊柱骨折 生物力学 内固定器 伤椎固定 Spinal fracture Biomechanics Internal fixator Fixation of fractured vertebra
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

  • 1Shen W J,Liu TJ,Shen YS.Nonoperative treatment versus posterior fixation for thoracolumbar junction brust fractures without neurologic deficit.Spine,2001,26:1038-1045.
  • 2李晶,吕国华,王冰,卢畅,康意军,马泽民,邓幼文,陈飞,刘伟东.胸腰椎骨折脱位伤椎固定的可行性研究[J].中华骨科杂志,2005,25(5):293-296. 被引量:230
  • 3Lu WW,Cheung KM,Li YW,et al.Bioactive bone cement as a principal fixture for spinal burst fracture.Spine,2001,26:2684-2691.
  • 4Chiba M,Mclain RF,Yerby SA,et al.Short-segment pedicle instrumentation:biomechanical analysis of supplemental hook fixation.Spine,1996,21:288-294.
  • 5昌耘冰,徐达传,尹庆水,赵卫东,艾福志,黄文华.三种椎间融合器对腰椎节段即时稳定性影响的三维运动研究[J].中华创伤骨科杂志,2004,6(12):1380-1383. 被引量:7
  • 6Shono Y,Kaneda K,Abumi K,et al.Stability of posterior spinal instrumeatation and its effect on adjacent motion segments in the lumbosacrd spine.Spine,1998,32:1550-1558.
  • 7Boucher HH.A method of spinal fusion.J Bone Joint Surg(Br),1959,41:248-259.
  • 8Roy-Camille R,Sailant G,Mazel C.Plating of thoracic,thoracolumbar and lumbar injures with pedicle screw plates.Orthop Clin North Am,1986,17:147-159.
  • 9杨操,杨述华,王洪,孟春庆,邵增务,肖宝钧.USS复位内固定结合经椎弓根植骨治疗胸腰椎爆裂性骨折[J].中华创伤骨科杂志,2005,7(6):537-540. 被引量:49
  • 10Kuklo TR,Polly DW,Owens BD,et al.Measurement of thoracic and lumbar fracture kyphosis:evaluation of intraobserver,interobserver,and technique variability.Spine,2001,26:61-66.

二级参考文献27

  • 1邹德威,海涌,马华松.AF三维椎弓根螺钉系统的研制及其临床应用[J].中华外科杂志,1995,33(4):219-221. 被引量:417
  • 2Kostuik JP. Anterior fixation for burst fractures of the thoracic and lumbar spine with or without neurological involvement. Spine,1988,13: 286-293.
  • 3Carl AL, Tranmer BI, Sachs BL. Anterolateral dynamized instrumentation and fusion for unstable thoracolumbar and lumbar burst fractures. Spine, 1997, 22: 686-690.
  • 4Dick JC, Jones MP, Zdeblick TA, et al. A biomechanical comparison evaluating the use of intermediate screws and cross-linkage in lumbar pedicle fixation. J Spinal Disord, 1994,7: 402-407.
  • 5沈文哲.脊柱爆裂性骨折处置[A]..见:第六届全国脊柱脊髓损伤学术会议讲座[C].长沙,2003.88.
  • 6Alvine GF, Swain JM, Asher MA. The safety and efficacy of variable screw placement(VSP) and Isola spinal implant systems for the surgical treatment of thoracolumbar burst fractures.J Bone Joint Surg(Br), 1997, 79(Suppl): 306-312.
  • 7Kramer DL, Rodgers WB, Mansfield FL. Transpedicular instrumentation and short-segment fusion of thoracolumbar fractures: a prospective study using a single instrumentation system. J Orthop Trauma, 1995, 9: 499-506.
  • 8McLain RF, Sparling E, Benson DR. Early failure of short-segment pedicle instrumentation for thoracolumbar fractures. A preliminary report. J Bone Joint Surg(Am), 1993,75: 162-167.
  • 9Garfin SR, Blair B, Eismont FJ. Thoracic and upper lumbar spine injuries. In: Browner BD, Jupiter JB, Levine AM,Trafton PG, eds. Skeletal trauma. 2nd ed. Philadelphia:W.B. Saunders, 2001. 947-1034.
  • 10Knop C, Fabian HF, Bastian L, Blanth M. Fate of the transpedicular intervertebral bone graft after posterior stabilization of thoracolumbar fractures. Eur Spine J, 2002, 11:251-257.

共引文献327

同被引文献351

引证文献44

二级引证文献372

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部